Design of a novel in-situ wet carbonated magnesium slag binder based on sodium carbonate activation: mechanical properties, phase transformation and microstructural evolution
Source abstract
Abstract
To enhance the low hydration activity and cementitious potential of magnesium slag (MS), this study developed an in-situ wet carbonated MS binder activated by sodium carbonate. Mechanical properties, reaction kinetics, phase assemblage, pore structure and microstructure were investigated to clarify mechanism-microstructure-performance relationships. Results reveal a concentration-dependent balance between hydration and carbonation. At moderate sodium carbonate contents, alkalinity promotes γ-C2S dissolution and C-S-H gel formation, while carbonate induces synchronous calcite precipitation, refining pores and producing a dense composite microstructure of interwoven C-S-H and rhombohedral calcite. This synergy increases compressive strength by about 103% relative to water curing. In contrast, excessive sodium carbonate causes rapid early calcite precipitation, forming surface encrustations that consume Ca2+ and hinder subsequent hydration, leading to discontinuous gel formation and limited strength gain despite pore refinement. Without sodium carbonate, both hydration and carbonation are kinetically limited. Controlled sodium carbonate activation therefore unlocks MS reactivity and transforms this industrial residue into a stronger, denser cementitious binder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Xiao-bin W, Xiang YaN, Xiu-Ying LI. Environmental risks for application of magnesium slag to soils in China. J Integr Agric. 2020;19:964–972. https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122431/records/6870dbe514f0e88d12ad60c3
2. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13826910.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138269 ↗
3. Lu P Zhao Y Zhang N et al. Structural characteristics and cementitious behavior of magnesium slag in comparison with granulated blast furnace slag. Materials. 2024;17(2):360.10.3390/ma17020360 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13844510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138445 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13480010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134800 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0177810.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01778 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12911210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129112 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13434510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134345 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.05.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2016.05.013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12361910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123619 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.04.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2019.04.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10118110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101181 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.21610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.216 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10188610.1016/j.jcou.2022.101886 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.01510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.015 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10567710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105677 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0476310.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04763 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.10596310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.105963 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10701010.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107010 ↗
21. 10.3390/buildings1403068110.3390/buildings14030681 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015 ↗
23. Ilić M, Milićević S, Radojević Z. Environmental protection by utilization of the slag from magnesium production in building materials. Toxicol Environ Chem. 1999;69(1-2):217–223. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0277224990935870310.1080/02772249909358703 ↗
24. Bernal SA, Provis JL, Myers RJ, et al. Role of carbonates in the chemical evolution of sodium carbonate-activated slag binders. Mater Struct. 2015;48(3):517–529.10.1617/s11527-014-0412-6 ↗
25. Yuan B Yu QL Brouwers HJH. Evaluation of slag characteristics on the reaction kinetics and mechanical properties of Na₂CO₃ activated slag. Constr Build Mater. 2017;131:334–346. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095006181631834710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.074 ↗
26. Ramaswamy R Illikainen M Yliniemi J. Influence of ligands as chemical admixtures in the early hydration of sodium carbonate-activated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater. 2024;422:135753. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095006182400894810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135753 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.03.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2014.03.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.02510.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.025 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.018 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13650810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136508 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10606510.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106065 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.10633910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.106339 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00195-110.1016/S0008-8846(98)00195-1 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11390510.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113905 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10461710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104617 ↗
37. Liu J Tian Y Ge X et al. Experimental study on MgO-Na₂CO₃ combined excitation recycled fine powder-slag cementitious system and modification. Buildings. 2024;14(3):592. https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/4vWnggwl/10.3390/buildings14030592 ↗
38. Liu Z, Zhang Z, Sun W, et al. Hydration mechanism of reactive and passive dicalcium silicate polymorphs from molecular simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(10):5521–5532. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05257
39. Lu H Liu Z Zhi X et al. Unveiling the heavy-metal ion critical role in γ-dicalcium silicate: from solidification to early hydration. RSC Adv. 2024;14(16):11400–11410. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/ra/d4ra01214c10.1039/D4RA01214C ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.10711910.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107119 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.007 ↗
42. Escalante-García JI, Sharp JH. Hydration products in two aged cement pastes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;82(1):255–260. https://akjournals.com/view/journals/10973/82/3/article-p731.xml
43. 10.1038/s41467-019-12168-810.1038/s41467-019-12168-8 ↗
44. Chemtalk IR. Spectrum: Table of IR spectroscopy values ChemTalk. 2023 [cited 2026 Mar 31]. https://chemistrytalk.org/ir-spectrum-values/
45. Huang X Li X Wang Y et al. Table 1. Assignment of characteristic absorption bands in infrared spectra. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9528. https://preview-www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-65631-8/tables/1
46. Yu P Kirkpatrick RJ Poe B et al. Structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H): near- mid- and far-infrared spectroscopy. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82(3):742–748. https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01826.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01826.x ↗
47. Tajuelo Rodriguez E Richardson IG Black L et al. Composition silicate anion structure and morphology of calcium silicate hydrates (C–S–H) synthesised by silica–lime reaction and by controlled hydration of tricalcium silicate (C3S). Adv Appl Ceram. 2015;114(7):362–371. doi: 10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000038.10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000038 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jobe.2026.11539310.1016/j.jobe.2026.115393 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14257910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142579 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.10643410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.106434 ↗