journal article·2026-01-09

Height Evolution Model Based on Material Properties and Closed-Loop Printing Compensation Method in Inkjet 3D Printing

Bu Ping, Jin Huang, Fanbo Meng, Xueyou Shi, Jiaying Zhang, Nan Bai, Pengfei Yuan

Publisher page

Abstract

Inkjet 3D printing has broad application prospects in the field of printed electronics. Surface topography has a significant impact on the electrical performance characteristics of many electronic devices, such as microstrip patch antennas. However, during the printing process, the characteristics of the deposited surface cause changes in the spreading morphology of the droplets. After layer-by-layer stacking, this effect is magnified, causing the surfaces of printed parts to be severely uneven, and ultimately affecting the electrical performance of electronic devices. The present work addresses inkjet 3D printing control and proposes a height evolution model based on material properties. The proposed model involves deriving the spreading diameter of the droplet from the material properties and ejection parameters, based on energy conservation. The quantitative relationship between droplet-spreading contact angle and deposition surface roughness is obtained experimentally, and the shape of the droplet is uniquely determined. In the height evolution model, the shape of the deposited droplet changes dynamically with the number of printed layers. Experimental results show that the height prediction error of the model for printed parts is within 6%, with a corresponding contour prediction error of less than 10 μm. Based on this model, a closed-loop printing compensation method for inkjet 3D printing is proposed. The method involves adding a surface topography measurement device to a traditional printing system and dynamically adjusting subsequent printing layers. The experimental results show that, compared with traditional open-loop printing, the proposed closed-loop printing compensation method reduced printed part surface roughness by 43.26–68.88%, and peak-to-peak profile by 45.40–49.92%. The effectiveness of this method for improving the performance of electronic devices was verified by printing a microstrip patch antenna and measuring the return loss of the printed sample. Compared to samples produced by open-loop printing, those produced by closed-loop printing were more consistent with the simulation design results, and the center frequency deviation was reduced by 80.95%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, 710048 China.

Funding

Shaanxi Key Industry Chain Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shaanxi Innovation Team Project · National 111 Project

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/d1mh00143d10.1039/d1mh00143d ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20210668310.1002/adma.202106683 ↗
3. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab721f10.1149/1945-7111/ab721f ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.001 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20190257910.1002/adfm.201902579 ↗
6. Kawahara Y Hodges S Cook BS et al. Instant inkjet circuits: Lab-based inkjet printing to support rapid prototyping of UbiComp devices. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM; 2013 pp. 363–372.10.1145/2493432.2493486 ↗
7. Guo Y Mishra S. A predictive control algorithm for layer-to-layer ink-jet 3D printing. In: 2016 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE; 2016 pp. 833–838.10.1109/ACC.2016.7525017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.01.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.01310.1016/j.addma.2017.12.013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.03910.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.039 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2016-021710.1108/RPJ-12-2016-0217 ↗
12. Guo Y Peters J Oomen T et al. Distributed model predictive control for ink-jet 3D printing. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE; 2017 pp. 436–441.10.1109/AIM.2017.8014056 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.04.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.04.002 ↗
14. Lu L Zheng J Mishra S. A model-based layer-to-layer control algorithm for ink-jet 3d printing. In: Dynamic systems and control conference (DSCC). ASME; V002T35A001; 2014.10.1115/DSCC2014-5914 ↗
15. 10.1109/TMECH.2014.236612310.1109/TMECH.2014.2366123 ↗
16. Wu Y Chiu G. Modeling height profile for drop-on-demand print of UV curable ink dynamic systems and control conference. In: Dynamic systems and control conference (DSCC). ASME; 2019:59155: V002T13A006.10.1115/DSCC2019-9242 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.405001210.1115/1.4050012 ↗
18. Wu Y Chiu G. An improved height difference based model of height profile for drop-on-demand 3D printing with UV curable ink. In: 2021 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE Publications; 2021 pp. 491–495.10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9483241 ↗
19. Inyang-Udoh U Mishra S. A learning-based approach to modeling and control of inkjet 3D printing. In: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE Publications; 2020 pp. 460–466.10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147313 ↗
20. 10.1080/0740817X.2014.95559910.1080/0740817X.2014.955599 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.402851010.1115/1.4028510 ↗
22. 10.1109/TMECH.2020.299987310.1109/TMECH.2020.2999873 ↗
23. 10.1098/rspa.1991.000210.1098/rspa.1991.0002 ↗