Effectiveness of rice husk ash-derived alkali activator in fresh, mechanical, and microstructure properties of geopolymer mortar at ambient temperature curing
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional geopolymers are proven to be eco-friendly compared to Portland cement-based concrete (PC). However, the used alkali activator, i.e. sodium silicate is associated with high carbon emission and cost, making the geopolymers not really a sustainable alternative to PC. This experimental investigation was carried out to understand the potential of rice husk ash (RHA)-based alkali activator in the synthesis of fly ash-blast furnace slag (FA-GGBFS)-based geopolymers at ambient temperature. Three different concentrations of sodium hydroxide (by wt. %) solutions, i.e. 20%, 24%, and 27%, were used to synthesize an RHA-based alkali activator. A commercial-grade sodium silicate solution was used to compare the results of geopolymer mortars (GPM) with the prepared RHA-based alkali activator. Fresh, mechanical, and microstructural investigations were carried out for both the RHA and commercial-grade alkali activator-based FA-GGBFS GPM specimens. The compressive strength of RHA-based optimum GPM was found to be 41 MPa at 28 days of the curing period, which was close to the control sample made with the commercial activator; similar observations were found for the flow table test. Microstructural investigation (XRD and SEM) confirmed that the GPM prepared with the RHA-based alkali activator has a similar microstructure as the GPM with the commercial-grade alkali activator.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan
Grøn Tek Concrete and Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Department of Civil Engineering, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla, Odisha, India
Centre for Waste Utilization, Environment and Sustainability Department, CSIR- Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Nantes Université, Ecole Centrale Nantes, CNRS, GeM, UMR 6183, Saint-Nazaire, France
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21650373.2021.189426510.1080/21650373.2021.1894265 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.10103210.1016/j.mtla.2021.101032 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-11351510.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.clay.2010.04.02410.1016/j.clay.2010.04.024 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.841.7910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.841.79 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.027 ↗
8. Davidovits J. Geopolymers: ceramic-like inorganic polymers. J Ceram Sci Technol. 2017;8:335–350.
9. 10.1080/14680629.2015.113263210.1080/14680629.2015.1132632 ↗
10. 10.22068/ijmse.17.4.1010.22068/ijmse.17.4.10 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12792310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127923 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00046-010.1016/S0892-6875(97)00046-0 ↗
13. 10.1080/19392699.2021.199537410.1080/19392699.2021.1995374 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cscee.2021.10015610.1016/j.cscee.2021.100156 ↗
15. 10.1201/9781003217619-2410.1201/9781003217619-24 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40831-021-00469-610.1007/s40831-021-00469-6 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10163-022-01381-110.1007/s10163-022-01381-1 ↗
18. Mishra J, Das SK, Krishna RS, et al. Utilization of ferrochrome ash as a source material for production of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner sustainable environment. Indian Concr J. 2020;94:40–49.
19. 10.1007/978-981-15-1404-3_2110.1007/978-981-15-1404-3_21 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.87010.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.870 ↗
21. 10.1080/21650373.2021.191365810.1080/21650373.2021.1913658 ↗
22. 10.1080/21650373.2023.221414610.1080/21650373.2023.2214146 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.10004710.1016/j.cesys.2021.100047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12834110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128341 ↗
25. Market Data Forecast Rice Husk Ash Market. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/rice-husk-ash-market
26. Yomthong K Wattanasiriwech S Wattanasiriwech D. Rice husk ash-geopolymer composite. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sciand Eng.2019;600(1):012003.10.1088/1757-899X/600/1/012003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.04510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.045 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.010 ↗
30. Das SK, Singh SK, Mustakim SM, et al. Incorporation of ultrafine rice husk ash (URHA) in Geopolymer concrete. ASTM International; 2019.
31. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0077710.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00777 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12649-011-9093-310.1007/s12649-011-9093-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.02510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.025 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.00110.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12968110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129681 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10447210.1016/j.jobe.2022.104472 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.18410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.184 ↗
38. 10.1080/21650373.2017.141129610.1080/21650373.2017.1411296 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10178010.1016/j.jobe.2020.101780 ↗
40. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. n.d.; [cited 2022 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.astm.org/c0618-19.html
41. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 650: specification for Standard Sand for Testing of Cement India. 1991; [cited 2023 Apr 11]. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.650.1991
42. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.018 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.04.00710.1016/j.jobe.2016.04.007 ↗
44. 10.1007/s40831-023-00653-w10.1007/s40831-023-00653-w ↗
45. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 10890: specification for planetary mixer used in tests of cement and pozzolana. India 1984; [cited 2023 Apr 11]. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.10890.1984/page/n5/mode/2up
46. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 4031-7: methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement Part 7: determination of compressive strength of masonry cement India. 1988
47. [cited 2023 Apr 11]. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.4031.7.1988/page/n5/mode/2up
48. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 13311-1: method of non-destructive testing of concret-methods of test Part 1: ultrasonic pulse velocity India. 1992
49. [cited 2023 Apr 12]. https://www.iitk.ac.in/ce/test/IS-codes/is.13311.1.1992.pdf
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.08210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10430310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104303 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.56810.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.568 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10951010.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109510 ↗
54. 10.1080/21650373.2017.129905410.1080/21650373.2017.1299054 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001 ↗
56. Davidovits J. Geopolymer chemistry and applications. 4th ed. Geopolymer Institute; 2015.
57. 10.1080/21650373.2020.182390510.1080/21650373.2020.1823905 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.03310.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.033 ↗
59. 10.1080/21650373.2021.192856510.1080/21650373.2021.1928565 ↗