Impact of groove-and-tongue parameters on the bonding behavior between 3d-printed UHP-SHCC and cast normal concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
The utilization of 3D-printed formworks represents a significant advancement in traditional construction practices, offering the potential to enhance structural capacity and effectively address reinforcement challenges in 3D concrete printing. Ensuring strong bonding between formwork and cast concrete is critical for structural integrity. In this study, 11 composite specimens with varying groove-and-tongue parameters including the layer number, spacing, length, and thickness of tongues undergo splitting tests. Results reveal that increasing the tongue’s layer number enhances the interfacial splitting tensile strength, whereas tongue spacing has minimal impact on interfacial strength, and a thicker tongue negatively affects the interfacial splitting tensile strength. An optimized groove-and-tongue configuration can significantly increase the interfacial splitting tensile strength from 2.10 MPa to 3.66 MPa, with a maximum increase rate of 70.4% and achieving a higher value (20.8%) than that of fully cast normal concrete. A splitting tensile strength model is proposed, with predictions aligning well with experimental results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong
Funding
Hong Kong Research Grants Council
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21650373.2019.170519910.1080/21650373.2019.1705199 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10411510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12764410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127644 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12702710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027 ↗
5. Schipper HR, Grünewald S. Efficient material use through smart flexible formwork method. ECO-Crete: International Symposium on Environmentally Friendly Concrete; 2014; Reykjavik, Iceland..
6. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.02310.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.023 ↗
7. 10.1088/1757-899X/271/1/01210810.1088/1757-899X/271/1/012108 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.09010.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.090 ↗
9. Das R, Bhattacharya I, Saha R. Comparative study between different types of formwork. Int Res J Adv Eng Sci. 2016;1:173–175.
10. Xiao Q, Su G, Zhang H, et al. Review on research and application of 3D printing technology in pavement repair. Journal of China & Foreign Highway. 2022;42:72–77.
11. Gulnigar A, Zhou S, Zhou J, et al. Workability elevation of 3D-printed geopolymer by 3D contour scanning. J Municipal Technol. 2023;41:26–30. +259.
12. Gong F, Cheng X, Wang Q, et al. Research on the application of 3D printing technology in asphalt pavement maintenance engineering. J Municipal Technol. 2023;41:31–38. +114.
13. 10.58224/2618-7183-2023-6-6-510.58224/2618-7183-2023-6-6-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12612610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126126 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10346710.1016/j.autcon.2020.103467 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10403910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104039 ↗
17. Sun X, Shen J, Wang H, et al. Bending behavior of composite beam with 3D printed concrete permanent formwork. China Civil Eng J. 2022;55:1–10.
18. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10636210.1016/j.jobe.2023.106362 ↗
19. 10.1002/suco.20220008810.1002/suco.202200088 ↗
20. 10.1080/21650373.2024.237727510.1080/21650373.2024.2377275 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11821110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118211 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10674610.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106746 ↗
23. 10.3151/jact.14.42110.3151/jact.14.421 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12919510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129195 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.017 ↗
26. 10.14359/5168718310.14359/51687183 ↗
27. 10.1080/15732479.2021.187610410.1080/15732479.2021.1876104 ↗
28. Shin HO, Lee SJ, Yoo DY. Bond behavior of pretensioned strand embedded in Ultra-High-performance fiber-Reinforced concrete. Int J Concr Struct M. 2018;12:13.
29. Luo J, Zeng T. Design and construction of 8 m new type composite covered culvert. J China Foreign Highway. 2021;41:130–133.
30. 10.1002/suco.20220034910.1002/suco.202200349 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11709-022-0843-z10.1007/s11709-022-0843-z ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10445710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104457 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13447210.1016/j.matlet.2023.134472 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10826810.1016/j.jobe.2023.108268 ↗
35. Luo J, Gao T, Yuan PF. Fabrication of reinforced 3D concrete printing formwork. In: Yuan PF, Chai H, Yan C, Li K, Sun T, editors. Singapore: Springer; 2023.
36. Liu X, Li Q, Wang L, et al. Bonding behavior of Spray-Based 3D printing magnesium phosphate cement and concrete. Bull Chinese Ceramic Soc. 2021;40:1895–1904.
37. Boned Ferrer S. Performance of 3D printed concrete formworks for bridge pillars focusing on casting [Student thesis] 2021.
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13784110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137841 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10331510.1016/j.jobe.2021.103315 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10606010.1016/j.jobe.2023.106060 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.01010.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.010 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11161010.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111610 ↗
43. 10.3151/jact.8.4910.3151/jact.8.49 ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000164010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001640 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10460110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104601 ↗
46. Sprinkel MM Ozyildirim C. Evaluation of high performance concrete overlays placed on Route 60 over Lynnhaven Inlet in Virginia2000.
47. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11074610.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110746 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.01910.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12622910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126229 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10435010.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104350 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.01610.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.016 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.011 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10646010.1016/j.jobe.2023.106460 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0283842110.1007/BF02838421 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000428310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004283 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11111710.1016/j.matdes.2022.111117 ↗