journal article·2022-11-02

High temperature resistant restoration mortar with fly ash and GGBFS

Rüya Kılıç Demircan, Gökhan Kaplan, Damla Nur Çelik

Publisher page

Abstract

Nowadays, the development of sustainable building materials is of loom large in for the preserve resources and reducing CO2 emission and environmental pollution effects. Exposure to fire or other high temperatures of mortars produced with calcium-based binders (cement or hydraulic lime) adversely affects their mechanical properties. In addition, the effect of high temperature may cause a change in the pore structures, causing cracking and spalling. Protecting the integrity of historical buildings exposed to high temperatures is important for cultural sustainability. In this study, natural hydraulic lime (NHL) used as a binder in mortars was replaced with 15, 30 and 60% fly ash (FA) and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS). In the mixtures, 1.5% (by volume) polypropylene fiber (PF) was also used. Test results reveal that while the mortars’ workability increased as the FA and GBFS content increased, PF decreased the flow diameters of the mortars. It has been determined that the paste content affects the porosity and water absorption rates of mortars. With the addition of FA content, paste content increased and porosity reduced. Compressive strength over 10 MPa was obtained by using 30% FA in 90-day lime mortars. As the addition of GBFS, the compressive and flexural strength were negatively affected. PF has reduced the porosity and water penetration depth of the mortars thanks to its micro filler effect. FA-based mixtures were more resistant to high temperatures than GBFS-based mixtures. Compressive strength was measured between 4.3 and 8.6 MPa after 600 °C temperature in FA-based mixtures. In fibrous mixtures, increment of mass loss was more with high temperature. C-S-H gels were observed in XRD and SEM analyzes of mortars exposed to high temperatures. PF was observed in stereomicroscope images of mixtures exposed to 200 °C. Since the porosity of the mortars is relatively high (19.7%–30.8%), the PF in the mixtures exposed to 200 °C did not melt completely but was damaged. As a result, it would be more appropriate to use 30% of FA and 15% of GBFS in NHL mortars.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Fire effects on concrete materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Construction, Boyabat Vocational School, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

Institute of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Vieira CMF · Rev Mater · 2009 · 14 · 881
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.13110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.131 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10174710.1016/j.jobe.2020.101747 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.01510.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.028 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00499-310.1016/S0008-8846(00)00499-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.078 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.053 ↗
9. Li L · Wen wu bao hu yu kao gu ke xue = Sci Conserv Archaeol · 2014 · 26 · 74
10. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.05910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.059 ↗
12. El-Turki A · J Am Ceram Soc · 2010 · 93 · 207410.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03667.x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.007 ↗
14. 10.1080/15583058.2018.143173210.1080/15583058.2018.1431732 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40857-020-00203-410.1007/s40857-020-00203-4 ↗
16. TS EN 459-1. Building lime—part 1: definitions, specifications and conformity criteria. 2002.
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.006 ↗
20. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Statistical Review of World Energy June 2018. BP Stat Rev World Energy; 2018.
21. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.11.01110.1016/j.jcou.2018.11.011 ↗
22. IEA. Coal Information 2019. Int Energy Agency; 2019.
23. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.04210.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.042 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10186810.1016/j.jobe.2020.101868 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.045 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.15310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.153 ↗
28. Gleisberg D. · 2019
29. 10.1007/s40831-020-00269-410.1007/s40831-020-00269-4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.030 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.003 ↗
32. 10.1080/15583058.2021.187179010.1080/15583058.2021.1871790 ↗
33. 10.1080/21650373.2019.158237010.1080/21650373.2019.1582370 ↗
34. 10.1080/21650373.2020.174874110.1080/21650373.2020.1748741 ↗
35. 10.1080/21650373.2013.87637310.1080/21650373.2013.876373 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.04710.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.047 ↗
37. 10.1080/19648189.2011.969336010.1080/19648189.2011.9693360 ↗
38. Grzybowski M · ACI Mater J · 1990 · 87 · 138
39. 10.1016/S0958-9465(97)87390-810.1016/S0958-9465(97)87390-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.052 ↗
41. 10.25156/ptj.v9n1y2019.pp7-1210.25156/ptj.v9n1y2019.pp7-12 ↗
42. Bayasi Z · ACI Mater J · 2002 · 99 · 22
43. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.07.00910.1016/j.firesaf.2012.07.009 ↗
44. Tran NP · J Sustain Cem Mater · 2021
45. 10.1080/21650373.2020.173498310.1080/21650373.2020.1734983 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12115410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121154 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matchar.2008.11.00310.1016/j.matchar.2008.11.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.027 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.007 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.02610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.026 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.02210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.022 ↗
52. 10.1080/13556207.2016.124808410.1080/13556207.2016.1248084 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.culher.2013.07.00910.1016/j.culher.2013.07.009 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.08.00710.1016/j.jobe.2016.08.007 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.16710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.167 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.042 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e0033910.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00339 ↗
58. ASTM C618-17a . Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. Annu B ASTM Stand. 2017.
59. ASTM C 989. Standard specification for slag cement for use in concrete and mortars . Annu B ASTM Stand. 2018.
60. ASTM C33-16 . Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM Int. 2016.
61. ASTM C1437 . Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM Int. 2013.
62. ASTM C20-00. Standard test methods for apparent porosity, water absorption, apparent specific gravity, and bulk density of burned refractory brick and shapes by boiling water. Am Soc Test Mater. 2015
63. ASTM C348 . Standard test method for flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars. Annu B ASTM Stand. 1998.
64. ASTM C349 . Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic-cement mortars (Using portions of prisms broken in flexure). ASTM Int. 2002.
65. ASTM C 1585-04 . Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. ASTM Int. 2004.
66. 10.1617/s11527-007-9250-010.1617/s11527-007-9250-0 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01038-410.1016/S0008-8846(02)01038-4 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.014 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.08.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2010.08.002 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.01410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.014 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.004 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.06910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.069 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11836010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118360 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.086 ↗
75. 10.1007/s11595-009-1140-610.1007/s11595-009-1140-6 ↗
76. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00022-X10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00022-X ↗
77. Zhao BH · Wuhan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal Wuhan Univ Technol · 2009 · 31 · 5
78. Xu Y · Adv Civ Eng · 2020 · 2020 · 475284110.1155/2020/4752841 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.01410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.014 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.009 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11996210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119962 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e0040710.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00407 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.02810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.028 ↗
84. 10.1007/s42452-020-1960-810.1007/s42452-020-1960-8 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.04510.1016/j.powtec.2011.11.045 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.05.00710.1016/j.powtec.2008.05.007 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.043 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.17810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.178 ↗
89. 10.1590/s1678-8621202000020038410.1590/s1678-86212020000200384 ↗
90. 10.1007/s11814-017-0019-z10.1007/s11814-017-0019-z ↗
91. Moon KY · J Ceram Process Res · 2016 · 17 · 122
92. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.069 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.08410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.084 ↗
94. 10.1617/s11527-014-0297-410.1617/s11527-014-0297-4 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.050 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.12110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.121 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.080 ↗
98. 10.1080/01694243.2017.140906810.1080/01694243.2017.1409068 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.009 ↗
100. 10.1023/A:102005640740210.1023/A:1020056407402 ↗