Analysis of fatigue strength on non-load-carrying and load-carrying fillet welded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
An attempt has been made to study, theoretically, the difference in the fatigue behaviour of non-load-carrying and load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints. In the former case, the pre-existing flaws produced during the welding process will always propagate from the weld toe. Accurate stress analysis using the boundary element method on the load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints shows that the weld throat, h, should not be less than 1.414 T, or the weld leg length, w, should not be less than 2.0 T, where T is the main plate thickness, for the cracks to initiate from the weld toe. Furthermore, the values of M k , the correction factor to take into account the presence of the weld, are found to decrease when the weld size is increased for the load-carrying fillet welded joints. The Paris crack propagation law is then computed numerically to obtain the S/N (signal-to-noise) curves for the two welded joints. The non-load-carrying fillet welded joints give 5 per cent higher fatigue life than the load-carrying ones for an applied stress range of 100 N/mm 2 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Structural Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Gurney T. R.
2. Gurney T. R. ‘Fatigue design rules for welded steel joints’, The Weld. Inst. Bull., 1976, 115–124.
3. Maddox S. J. ‘An analysis of fatigue cracks in fillet welded joints’, Research Report E/49/72, The Welding Institute, Cambridge, 1972.
4. 10.1007/BF0003889010.1007/BF00038890 ↗
5. Gurney T. R., Johnston G. O. ‘A revised analysis of the influence of toe defects on the fatigue strength of transverse non-load-carrying fillet welds’, Research Report 62/1978/E, The Welding Institute, Cambridge, 1978.
6. Frank K. H. The fatigue strength of fillet welded connections, PhD Thesis, Lehigh University, 1971.
7. Ahmet M. T. The effect of thickness on allowable defect sizes in fillet welded joints under fatigue loading, MSc Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 1980.
8. Gurney T. R. ‘Theoretical analysis of the influence of attachment size on the fatigue strength of transverse non-load-carrying fillet welds’, Research Report 91/1979, The Welding Institute, Cambridge, 1979.
9. Lie S. T. The influence of geometrical parameters on the fatigue strength of fillet welds using boundary element and fracture mechanics methods, PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 1983.
10. Tada K. · 1973
11. Signes E. G., Baker R. G., Harrison J. D., Burdekin F. M. ‘Factors affecting the fatigue strength of welded high strength steel’, Br. Weld. J., 1967, 108–116.
12. Brebbia C. A. · 1989
13. Mooi K. K., Toh C. G. ‘Boundary element and fracture mechanics analysis for the fatigue strength of Class F and Class F2 fillet welded connections’, Final Year Project Report, School of Civil and Structural Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 1992.
14. Albrecht P. · J. Struct. Div. · 1977 · 103 · 37710.1061/JSDEAG.0004556 ↗