Experimental and numerical studies on fracture characteristics of notched granite beams under cyclic loading and unloading
Source abstract
Abstract
In underground engineering, such as mining engineering and deep tunnel engineering, the rock is often loaded and unloaded repeatedly. The strength of rock under cyclic load is lower than that under static load. To obtain the fracture response of the rock, the three-point bending tests of notched granite beams under cyclic loading and unloading were carried out with Electro-hydraulic Servo Material Test System. The acoustic emission technology was adopted to monitor the acoustic emission events of sample in the process of fracture. It is revealed that the fracture toughness of granite under cyclic loading and unloading is lower than that under static loading. Based on the acoustic emission energy obtained from monitoring, the damage evolution during cyclic loading and unloading was analyzed. The fracture mode of granite samples is analyzed by the RA value-average frequency correlation method. And the Felicity ratio during the loading and unloading cycle was calculated to evaluate the severity of initial damage of the material. It is revealed that Kaiser effect appears only in the elastic deformation stage of cyclic loading unloading bending. The Holmquist–Johnson–Cook damage constitutive model and Weibull distribution were used to establish the heterogeneous granite model. And the three-point bending of the model under cyclic loading and unloading was simulated to disclose the crack growth mechanism of rock. The study may provide some references for rock instability control in geotechnical engineering construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geomechanics and Mining Engineering · Geoscience and Mining Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China
State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(459)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(459) ↗
2. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.07.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2003.07.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.08.01510.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.08.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.00710.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.01510.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.08810.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.088 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.03510.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.035 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.00510.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.005 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40948-015-0017-810.1007/s40948-015-0017-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.016 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10064-014-0707-410.1007/s10064-014-0707-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.02110.1016/j.cma.2019.06.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.01110.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.11.01310.1016/j.compgeo.2017.11.013 ↗
15. Potyondy D. A grain-based model for rock: approaching the true microstructure. In: Proceedings of the rock mechanics in the Nordic Countries, Kongsberg, 9–12 June 2010, pp.9–12.
16. Nicksiar M · Rock Mec Rock Eng · 2014 · 47
17. 10.1002/2016JB01346910.1002/2016JB013469 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00603-013-0494-410.1007/s00603-013-0494-4 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00603-017-1389-610.1007/s00603-017-1389-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00008-310.1016/S1365-1609(00)00008-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.009 ↗
22. 10.1520/STP44663S10.1520/STP44663S ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.03.01210.1016/j.tafmec.2016.03.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.03.00710.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.03.007 ↗
25. 10.1590/1679-7825248610.1590/1679-78252486 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0102711610.1007/BF01027116 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00081-310.1016/S0167-6636(01)00081-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00138-710.1016/S1365-1609(02)00138-7 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0104180610.1007/BF01041806 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.01210.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12665-016-5681-710.1007/s12665-016-5681-7 ↗
32. Holmquist TJJG · 1993 · 591
33. Fang Q · Advan Protec Struct Res · 2012 · 1 · 33
34. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.010 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.001 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.401033710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.00610.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.006 ↗
39. LS-DYNA · 2006
40. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10238210.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102382 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.07.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2017.07.008 ↗