journal article·2009-10-01

Assessment of effective stress intensity factors using thermoelastic stress analysis

F A Diaz, E A Patterson, J R Yates

Publisher page

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) can provide accurate information about the real crack-driving force for fatigue crack growth. Experiments were conducted using aluminium 2024 compact tension specimens which were initially pre-cracked to different crack lengths at a constant R ( R = 0). Subsequently, thermoelastic images were captured at increasing R values from 0 to 0.5 and Δ K values from 3 to 6 MPa m 0.5 were calculated. The images showed a dramatic change in the stress pattern ahead of the crack tip as R decreased which was always associated with an increase in phase difference (loss of adiabatic conditions) ahead of the crack tip. This indicates that the technique is able to account for the change in conditions that arise from contact between the crack faces. To support this observation, thermoelastic results have been compared with those obtained using compliance methods. The results showed a very good level of agreement, illustrating the ability of TSA to infer successfully the effective Δ K.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Minera, Universidad de Jaén, Campus las Lagunillas, Jaén, Spain

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
2. James M. N. · 1996 · 5 · 2403
3. Greene R. J. · 2008
4. Ritchie R. O., Suresh S. Some considerations on fatigue crack closure at near-threshold stress intensities due to fracture surface morphology Metall. Trans. A 13A (5) (1982 937–94010.1007/BF02642409 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1989.tb00536.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1989.tb00536.x ↗
6. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00273-410.1016/S0013-7944(02)00273-4 ↗
7. Stanley P., Chan W. K. The determination of stress intensity factors and crack tip velocities from thermoelastic infra-red emissions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fatigue of engineering materials and structures, Sheffield, UK September 1986, pp. 105–114 (Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London).
8. 10.1117/12.93789010.1117/12.937890 ↗
9. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00289.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00289.x ↗
10. 10.1520/STP11902S10.1520/STP11902S ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00279.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00279.x ↗
12. Batchelor H. · 1998
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.018 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.1995.tb00949.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.1995.tb00949.x ↗
15. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00691.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00691.x ↗
16. E647–95a: Standard methods for the measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. Annual book of standards, vol. 03.01, 1999 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
17. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00439.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00439.x ↗
18. 10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00103-810.1016/S0013-7944(96)00103-8 ↗
19. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00164.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00164.x ↗
20. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00444.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00444.x ↗
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(88)90242-110.1016/0013-7944(88)90242-1 ↗
22. Castro J. T. P. · Exp. Mech. · 1993 · 17 · 23
23. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00782.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00782.x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.014 ↗
25. Ewalds H. L. · 1989
26. 10.1520/JAI1322210.1520/JAI13222 ↗