journal article·2003-01-01

Finite element analysis of calibration factors for the modified incremental strain method

B-W Hwang, C-M Suh, S-H Kim

Publisher page

Abstract

To modify the incremental strain method used to evaluate non-uniform residual stress, a finite element analysis (FEA) of the reference model used to describe a hole-drilling test was conducted. The calibration factors for the x and y directions were obtained from the analysis and then their differences were compared under various loading conditions. A hole-drilling test using a steel plate as the reference specimen was introduced, and under the pure bending load, strain relaxation was measured at each hole-drilling step to determine the calibration factors. Although the calibration factors in the x and y directions varied with the boundary conditions used in the FEA, their differences were reduced to zero for all depths when the prescribed loads as the boundary conditions in the x and y directions became the same. In addition, it was analytically and experimentally confirmed that the calibration factors did not vary with the direction. Accordingly, by making the calibration factors equal in the x and y directions in the modified equation for the incremental strain method, no singularity is produced in the stress calculations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kyungpook National University Department of Mechanical Engineering Taegu, Korea

Kyungpook National University Graduate School of Mechanical Engineering Taegu, Korea

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Noyan I. C. · 1987
2. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00104-310.1016/S0142-1123(00)00104-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00083-X10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00083-X ↗
4. 10.1016/0928-4931(95)00053-410.1016/0928-4931(95)00053-4 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00156.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00156.x ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00862-510.1016/S0921-5093(00)00862-5 ↗
7. Tiitto K. Use of Barkhausen effect in testing for residual stresses and material defects. In Proceedings of ASM's Conference on Residual Stress in Design, Process and Materials Selection, 1987, pp. 27–36.
8. Mathar J. · Trans. ASME · 1934 · 56 · 249
9. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.1976.tb00194.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.1976.tb00194.x ↗
10. 10.1115/1.322498810.1115/1.3224988 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.322605910.1115/1.3226059 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.322606010.1115/1.3226060 ↗
13. 10.1016/0377-0427(95)00089-510.1016/0377-0427(95)00089-5 ↗
14. Flaman M. T., Boag J. M. Comparison of residualstress variation with depth-analysis techniques for the hole-drilling method Expl Mechanics, December 1990, 352–355.10.1007/BF02321503 ↗
15. Zhu W.X., Smith D. J. Residual stresses by hole-drilling in curved components. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Experimental Mechanics, 1994, pp. 777–782.