Numerical analysis of the influence of the damping rings’ dimensions on interrupted dynamic tension experiment results
Source abstract
Abstract
This article discusses the influence of the dimensions of the damping rings used for interrupting a dynamic tension experiment on the results of a modified split Hopkinson tension bar. The damping rings enclosed in an external fixture which modifies the classical split Hopkinson tension bar play a significant role in buffering the dynamic tension experiments before the specimen reaches its failure strength. Finite element simulations of high-strain-rate tension experiments are accomplished on Aluminium 7017-T73 alloy specimens when varying the thickness or the cross-sectional area of the damping rings. Finite element analyses described herein are applied to simulate the effects of the variation of the damping rings’ dimensions to provide a reference for improvement of a modified split Hopkinson tension bar experimental apparatus and guidance for future studies in which optimum dimensions for the damping rings can be studied. In view of this research, it can be concluded that the thickness of the damping rings is a factor that can resolutely influence the interrupted dynamic tension experiment results, while their cross-sectional area can be excluded as a factor influencing the results of the modified split Hopkinson tension bar experiments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture and Design, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0054207810.1007/BF00542078 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0232624410.1007/BF02326244 ↗
3. 10.1016/0029-5493(76)90056-X10.1016/0029-5493(76)90056-X ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0232664410.1007/BF02326644 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0232606510.1007/BF02326065 ↗
6. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00385-110.1016/1359-6454(95)00385-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00069-110.1016/S0734-743X(03)00069-1 ↗
8. Gray GT. Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000, pp.462–476.10.31399/asm.hb.v08.a0003296 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.170462610.1115/1.1704626 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.08.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.08.004 ↗
11. 10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/30210.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.004 ↗
13. Van Slycken J. Advanced use of a split Hopkinson bar setup application to TRIP steels. Doctoral Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium, 2008.
14. 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00436-610.1016/S0924-0136(97)00436-6 ↗
15. Khlif M · Materials science and technology conference and exhibition (MS&T) · 2012
16. Verleysen P · Lat Am J Solids Struct · 2009 · 6 · 285
17. Kaiser MA · 1998
18. Swantek S · 2001 · 2 · 1471
19. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.16710.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.167 ↗
20. Rodríguez Pérez J · Análisis y desarrollo de metodologías para la obtenciæn de propiedades mecánicas de materiales a altas velocidades de deformacién y a alta temperatura · 2002
21. Resnyansky A · Study of influence of loading method on results of the split Hopkinson bar test · 2000 · 597
22. 10.1007/s11340-013-9828-010.1007/s11340-013-9828-0 ↗
23. 10.1098/rspa.1991.015010.1098/rspa.1991.0150 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.351647510.1063/1.3516475 ↗
25. 10.1243/03093247JSA20610.1243/03093247JSA206 ↗
26. Lezcano R · J Phys IV · 2003 · 110 · 565
27. ASTM E8/E8M-13a: standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013, http://www.astm.org
28. Wu X · J Phys IV · 1997 · 7 · 91
29. 10.1115/1.312464710.1115/1.3124647 ↗
30. ABAQUS (version 5.8). Pawtucket, RI: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., 1999
31. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5117-810.1007/978-1-4757-5117-8 ↗