journal article·2017-05

Evaluation of size effect on mixed-mode fracture behavior of epoxy/silica nanocomposites

Ahmad Ghasemi-Ghalebahman, Javad Akbardoost, Yaser Ghaffari

Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of size on the mixed-mode fracture toughness of quasi-brittle nanocomposites with the help of modified maximum tangential stress criterion. The literature reveals that the effect of size on mixed-mode fracture behavior of brittle nanocomposites has not been well investigated previously using modified maximum tangential stress criterion. The studied nanocomposites were made of epoxy resin reinforced with 7 wt%, 20–30 nm nanosilica. The accuracy of the method was assessed by taking into account the high-order terms of Williams series expansion along with finite element over-deterministic method. To investigate the effect of size on fracture toughness, a number of three-point semi-circular bending tests with different radii and four angles of edge–crack orientation were conducted and subjected to mixed-mode loading. The size of fracture process zone and apparent fracture toughness ( K c ) were also evaluated as a function of sample size. Experimental results showed that the proposed approach can accurately predict the fracture behavior of studied nanocomposites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.01310.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.013 ↗
2. Weibull W. The phenomenon of rupture in solids, Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research (Ingenioersvetenskaps Akad. Handl.), Stockholm, 1939; 153: I–55.
3. Leicester RH · 1969 · 4.1
4. Bazant ZP · 1982 · 3 · 1137
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0270699510.1007/BF02706995 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10704-008-9291-610.1007/s10704-008-9291-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/0021-8928(80)90161-610.1016/0021-8928(80)90161-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10704-008-9290-710.1007/s10704-008-9290-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.005 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00603-013-0430-710.1007/s00603-013-0430-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.01010.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.24710.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.247 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.10.02710.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.10.027 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.401145410.1115/1.4011454 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10704-008-9280-910.1007/s10704-008-9280-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.04.00810.1016/j.commatsci.2006.04.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00025-X10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00025-X ↗
23. 10.1115/1.365689710.1115/1.3656897 ↗
24. 10.1016/0013-7944(90)90193-K10.1016/0013-7944(90)90193-K ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0001992210.1007/BF00019922 ↗
26. 10.1016/0148-9062(91)93232-U10.1016/0148-9062(91)93232-U ↗
27. Bazant ZP · 1997 · 16
28. Karihaloo BL · 1995 · 35
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(289)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(289) ↗
30. 10.1007/s12517-015-1906-410.1007/s12517-015-1906-4 ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01504.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01504.x ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.03010.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.030 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.00110.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.001 ↗