Carbon-Based Piezoresistive Polymer Nanocomposites by Extrusion Additive Manufacturing: Process, Material Design, and Current Progress
Source abstract
Abstract
Advancement in additive manufacturing (AM) allows the production of nanocomposites with complex and custom geometries not typically allowable with conventional manufacturing techniques. The benefits of AM have led to recent interest in producing multifunctional materials capable of being printed with current AM technologies. In this article, piezoresistive composites realized by AM and the matrices and fillers utilized to make such devices are introduced and discussed. Carbon-based nanoparticles (Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene/Graphite, and Carbon Black) are often the filler choice of most researchers and are heavily discussed throughout this review in combination with extrusion AM methods. Piezoresistive applications such as physiological and wearable sensors, structural health monitoring, and soft robotics are presented with an emphasis on material and AM selection to meet the demands of such applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science, Engineering, & Commercialization, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.
Mechanical Engineering, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Hull CW. Method for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. UVP Inc.: USA; 1990.
2. 10.3390/ma1416452110.3390/ma14164521 ↗
3. 10.1002/sus2.1110.1002/sus2.11 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0025210.1021/acsapm.1c00252 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
6. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/00910.1088/0964-1726/15/3/009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10843710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108437 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0029210.1021/acsaelm.0c00292 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0027810.1021/acsaelm.0c00278 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.00410.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.02010.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.020 ↗
13. Cotteleer M, , Joyce J. 3D opportunity: Additive manufacturing paths to performance, innovation, and growth. Deloitte Rev, 2014; 14:5–19.
14. 10.1103/PhysRev.36.50610.1103/PhysRev.36.506 ↗
15. Figliola RS Beasley DE. Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements 5th Edition. John Wiley: Hoboken NJ USA; 2010.
16. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.00610.1016/j.sna.2018.07.006 ↗
17. 10.1109/JPROC.2009.201361210.1109/JPROC.2009.2013612 ↗
18. Doll JC Pruitt BL. Piezoresistor Design and Applications. Springer: New York NY USA;. 2013.10.1007/978-1-4614-8517-9 ↗
19. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab682810.1149/1945-7111/ab6828 ↗
20. Alemour B, , Badran O, , Hassan MR. A review of using conductive composite materials in solving lightening strike and ice accumulation problems in aviation. J Aerosp Technol Manag, 2019; 11:3–9; doi: 10.5028/jatm.v11.1022
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10573510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105735 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0035779910.1007/BF00357799 ↗
23. Zallen R. The Physics of Amorphous Solids. John Wiley & Sons: New York NY USA; 1983.10.1002/3527602798 ↗
24. 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.57410.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
25. 10.1163/156855499X0016110.1163/156855499X00161 ↗
26. 10.1021/cm052777310.1021/cm0527773 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.010 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.10.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.10.011 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
30. Rizvi R. Piezoresistance in Polymer Nanocomposites. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto; 2014.
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.03010.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
32. Thuau D, , Ayela C, , Dufour I, et al. Preparation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-SU8 composite for piezo-resistive gauges application. In: The 4th International Meeting on the Chemistry of Nanotubes and Graphene. Arcachon, France; 2012.
33. 10.1063/1.471601010.1063/1.4716010 ↗
34. Tipler PA Llewellyn R. Modern Physics. Macmillan: Hampshire UK; 2008.
35. 10.1038/s41467-020-17301-610.1038/s41467-020-17301-6 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c0697710.1021/acsami.0c06977 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.5b0069510.1021/acsami.5b00695 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.04.00210.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00155-X10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00155-X ↗
41. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.01.02410.1016/j.powtec.2012.01.024 ↗
42. Bhuyan S, , Uddin N, , Bipasha FA, et al. A Review of Functionalized Graphene properties and its application. Int J Innov Sci Res, 2015; 17(2):303–315.
43. Dai J-F, , Wang G-J, , Ma L, et al. Surface properties of graphene: Relationship to graphene-polymer composites. Rev Adv Mater Sci, 2015; 40(1):60–71.
44. Rothon R. Nanofillers. In: Fillers for Polymer Applications. (Rothon R ed.) Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2017; pp. 463–484.10.1007/978-3-319-28117-9_78 ↗
45. Wypych G. 3.2.1.—Carbon black. In: Databook of Antistatics. (Wypych G ed.) Elsevier: Oxford; 2014; pp. 245–271.10.1016/B978-1-895198-61-4.50007-9 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-3-319-28117-9_3210.1007/978-3-319-28117-9_32 ↗
47. 10.1002/pen.76018080810.1002/pen.760180808 ↗
48. 10.1038/363603a010.1038/363603a0 ↗
49. Choudhary V Gupt A. Polymer/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites. InTech; 2011.10.5772/18423 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.12140610.1103/PhysRevB.67.121406 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-94-011-4038-6_910.1007/978-94-011-4038-6_9 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.1493510.1103/PhysRevB.52.14935 ↗
53. 10.3390/nano603003610.3390/nano6030036 ↗
54. 10.3390/polym1005047710.3390/polym10050477 ↗
55. 10.3390/ma1210157910.3390/ma12101579 ↗
56. 10.1002/pc.2538010.1002/pc.25380 ↗
57. 10.1039/C9NA00176J10.1039/C9NA00176J ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10861010.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108610 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsami.8b1457310.1021/acsami.8b14573 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.05510.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.055 ↗
61. 10.1002/ange.20100752010.1002/ange.201007520 ↗
62. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/46/46570210.1088/0957-4484/24/46/465702 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.05410.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.054 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.10260810.1016/j.rinp.2019.102608 ↗
65. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.12.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2011.12.010 ↗
67. 10.1109/TEMC.2011.217885310.1109/TEMC.2011.2178853 ↗
68. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/27571410.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275714 ↗
69. 10.1088/1361-665X/aacfe610.1088/1361-665X/aacfe6 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0049010.1021/acsaelm.0c00490 ↗
71. 10.1007/978-3-319-28117-9_3310.1007/978-3-319-28117-9_33 ↗
72. 10.5254/1.353821310.5254/1.3538213 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.00910.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009 ↗
74. 10.1002/adv.1002510.1002/adv.10025 ↗
75. Probst N. Conducting carbon black. In: Carbon Black: Science and Technology. (Donnet JB, ed.) CRC Press: New York, NY, USA; 1993; pp. 271–288.
76. Kazemian Abyaneh M, , Ekar S, , Kulkarni SK. Piezoresistivity and mechanical behavior of metal-polymer composites under uniaxial pressure. J Mater Sci Res, 2012; 1(3):50–58; doi: 10.5539/jmsr.v1n3p50
77. 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00064-210.1016/S0014-3057(02)00064-2 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.09310.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.093 ↗
79. 10.1002/adma.20170381710.1002/adma.201703817 ↗
80. 10.1007/s10853-020-05137-w10.1007/s10853-020-05137-w ↗
81. 10.1002/admt.20180050010.1002/admt.201800500 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.008 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.07010.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.070 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10919910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109199 ↗
85. 10.3390/s1711267710.3390/s17112677 ↗
86. 10.1155/2014/61479710.1155/2014/614797 ↗
87. Gunaydin K Türkmen H. Common FDM 3D printing defects. In: 3rd International Congress on 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry. Antalya Turkey; 2018.
88. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10116210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.01010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
90. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab3b3510.1088/1361-665X/ab3b35 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.04610.1016/j.procir.2017.01.046 ↗
92. 10.3390/polym1201010110.3390/polym12010101 ↗
93. 10.3390/nano801004910.3390/nano8010049 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10128110.1016/j.addma.2020.101281 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.02010.1016/j.sna.2017.07.020 ↗
96. 10.1080/09276440.2020.179447910.1080/09276440.2020.1794479 ↗
97. 10.1007/978-3-642-40322-4_210.1007/978-3-642-40322-4_2 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.01910.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.019 ↗
100. Proto-Pasta. Technical Data Sheet. 2018. Available from: https://www.proto-pasta.com/collections/all/products/conductive-pla [Last accessed: November19 2022].