journal article·2023-07Open access

Photoluminescence properties of silk–carbon quantum dots composites

Elena Colusso, Luca Cicerchia, Michele Rigon, Vincent Gomes, Alessandro Martucci

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we report silk fibroin (SF) and carbon quantum dots (CQDs) nanocomposites obtained through a facile solution casting approach. The optical properties of the nanocomposites have been characterised by UV–vis absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Crosslinking of SF and chemical interactions with the CQDs have been investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. In addition, water stability and degradability of the prepared composites have been investigated in terms of mass loss, important for applications in a real scenario. We observed that for a concentration of CQDs above 1%wt aggregation of nanoparticles occurs, affecting the photoluminescence of the material. The results show that the best composition in terms of photoluminescence intensity and water stability is 0.5%wt CQDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang R, Lu K-Q, Tang Z-R, Xu Y-J (2017) Recent progress in carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications in photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 5:3717–3734. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08660H10.1039/C6TA08660H ↗
2. Alaghmandfard A, Sedighi O, Tabatabaei Rezaei N et al. (2021) Recent advances in the modification of carbon-based quantum dots for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 120:111756. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2020.11175610.1016/J.MSEC.2020.111756 ↗
3. Zheng XT, Ananthanarayanan A, Luo KQ, Chen P (2015) Glowing graphene quantum dots and carbon dots: Properties, syntheses, and biological applications. Small 11:1620–1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20140264810.1002/smll.201402648 ↗
4. Chang H, Wu H (2013) Graphene-based nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and optical and optoelectronic applications. Adv Funct Mater 23:1984–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20120246010.1002/adfm.201202460 ↗
5. Facure MHM, Schneider R, Mercante LA, Correa DS (2020) A review on graphene quantum dots and their nanocomposites: From laboratory synthesis towards agricultural and environmental applications. Environ Sci Nano 7:3710–373410.1039/D0EN00787K ↗
6. Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev 44:362–38110.1039/C4CS00269E ↗
7. Zhu S, Meng Q, Wang L et al. (2013) Highly photoluminescent carbon dots for multicolor patterning, sensors, and bioimaging. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:3953–3957. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130051910.1002/anie.201300519 ↗
8. Mintz KJ, Zhou Y, Leblanc RM (2019) Recent development of carbon quantum dots regarding their optical properties, photoluminescence mechanism, and core structure. Nanoscale 11:4634–465210.1039/C8NR10059D ↗
9. Du X-Y, Wang C-F, Wu G, Chen S (2021) The rapid and large-scale production of carbon quantum dots and their integration with. Polym Angew Chem Int Ed 60:8585–8595. https://doi.org/10.1002/ANIE.20200410910.1002/ANIE.202004109 ↗
10. Kovalchuk A, Huang K, Xiang C et al. (2015) Luminescent polymer composite films containing coal-derived graphene quantum dots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26063–26068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0605710.1021/acsami.5b06057 ↗
11. Yang G, Wan X, Liu Y et al. (2016) Luminescent poly(vinyl alcohol)/carbon quantum dots composites with tunable water-induced shape memory behavior in different ph and temperature environments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:34744–34754. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1147610.1021/acsami.6b11476 ↗
12. Luk CM, Tang LB, Zhang WF et al. (2012) An efficient and stable fluorescent graphene quantum dot-agar composite as a converting material in white light emitting diodes. J Mater Chem 22:22378–22381. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm35305a10.1039/c2jm35305a ↗
13. Feng Z, Adolfsson KH, Xu Y et al. (2021) Carbon dot/polymer nanocomposites: from green synthesis to energy, environmental and biomedical applications. Sustain Mater Technol 29:e00304. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUSMAT.2021.E0030410.1016/J.SUSMAT.2021.E00304 ↗
14. Zhou Z, Zhang S, Cao Y et al. (2018) Engineering the Future of Silk Materials through Advanced Manufacturing. Adv Mater 1706983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170698310.1002/adma.201706983 ↗
15. DeBari MK, Claude I, King I, Altgold TA, Abbott RD (2021) Silk fibroin as a green material. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7:3530–3544. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C0049310.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C00493 ↗
16. Matsumoto A, Chen J, Collette AL et al. (2006) Mechanisms of silk fibroin sol-gel transitions. J Phys Chem B 110:21630–21638. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056350v10.1021/jp056350v ↗
17. Lin Y, Xia X, Shang K et al. (2013) Tuning chemical and physical cross-links in silk electrogels for morphological analysis and mechanical reinforcement. Biomacromolecules 14:2629–2635. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400489210.1021/bm4004892 ↗
18. Huson MG, Church JS, Poole JM et al. (2012) Controlling the molecular structure and physical properties of artificial honeybee silk by heating or by immersion in solvents. PLoS ONE 7:e52308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.005230810.1371/journal.pone.0052308 ↗
19. Colusso E, Martucci A (2021) An overview of biopolymer-based nanocomposites for optics and electronics. J Mater Chem C 9:5578–5593. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC00607J10.1039/D1TC00607J ↗
20. Lin N, Hu F, Sun Y et al. (2014) Construction of white-light-emitting silk protein hybrid films by molecular recognized assembly among hierarchical structures. Adv Funct Mater 24:5284–5290. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140024910.1002/adfm.201400249 ↗
21. Lu D, Zheng Z, Guo S et al. (2015) Binding quantum dots to silk biomaterials for optical sensing. J Sensors https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/81937310.1155/2015/819373 ↗
22. Ardekani SM, Dehghani A, Hassan M et al. (2017) Two-photon excitation triggers combined chemo-photothermal therapy via doped carbon nanohybrid dots for effective breast cancer treatment. Chem Eng J 330:651–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.16510.1016/j.cej.2017.07.165 ↗
23. Ardekani SM, Dehghani A, Ye P et al. (2019) Conjugated carbon quantum dots: Potent nano-antibiotic for intracellular pathogens. J Colloid Interface Sci 552:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.06710.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.067 ↗
24. Vepari C, Kaplan DL (2007) Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32:991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROGPOLYMSCI.2007.05.01310.1016/J.PROGPOLYMSCI.2007.05.013 ↗
25. Liu P, Wei Z, Cheng K et al. (2020) Self-healable flexible luminescent films based on silk fibroin and graphene quantum dots. OSA Contin 3:1021. https://doi.org/10.1364/osac.38387210.1364/osac.383872 ↗
26. Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T et al. (2011) Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc 6:1612–1631. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
27. Colusso E, Perotto G, Wang Y et al. (2017) Bioinspired stimuli-responsive multilayer film made of silk–titanate nanocomposites. J Mater Chem C 5:3924–3931. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC00149E10.1039/C7TC00149E ↗
28. Qi Y, Wang H, Wei K et al. (2017) A Review of Structure Construction of Silk Fibroin Biomaterials from Single Structures to Multi-Level Structures. Int J Mol Sci 18:237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1803023710.3390/ijms18030237 ↗
29. Tang L, Ji R, Cao X et al. (2012) Deep ultraviolet photoluminescence of water-soluble self-passivated graphene quantum dots. ACS Nano 6:5102–5110. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300760g10.1021/nn300760g ↗
30. Sionkowska A, Planecka A (2011) The influence of UV radiation on silk fibroin. Polym Degrad Stab 96:523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.001 ↗
31. Song SH, Jang M, Yoon H et al. (2016) Size and pH dependent photoluminescence of graphene quantum dots with low oxygen content. RSC Adv 6:97990–97994. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21651j10.1039/c6ra21651j ↗
32. Parlak O, Demir MM (2013) Anomalous transmittance of polystyrene-ceria nanocomposites at high particle loadings. J Mater Chem C 1:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2tc00084a10.1039/c2tc00084a ↗
33. Guo C, Zhang J, Jordan JS et al. (2018) Structural comparison of various silkworm silks: an insight into the structure-property relationship. Biomacromolecules 19:906–917. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0168710.1021/acs.biomac.7b01687 ↗
34. Tsukada M, Gotoh Y, Nagura M et al. (1994) Structural changes of silk fibroin membranes induced by immersion in methanol aqueous solutions. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 32:961–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1994.09032051910.1002/polb.1994.090320519 ↗
35. Hu Y, Zhang Q, You R et al. (2012) The relationship between secondary structure and biodegradation behavior of silk fibroin scaffolds. Adv Mater Sci Eng https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/18590510.1155/2012/185905 ↗
36. Kweon H, Um IC, Park YH (2001) Structural and thermal characteristics of Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin/chitosan blend film. Polymer 42:6651–6656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00104-510.1016/S0032-3861(01)00104-5 ↗
37. Jin HJ, Park J, Karageorgiou V et al. (2005) Water-stable silk films with reduced β-sheet content. Adv Funct Mater 15:1241–1247. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20040040510.1002/adfm.200400405 ↗