The flow stress prediction of TiB2/2024 aluminum matrix composites based on modified Arrhenius model and gene expression programming model
Source abstract
Abstract
The high temperature flow data of TiB 2 /2024 aluminum matrix composites (referred to as TiB 2 /2024 alloy) was investigated using a Gleeble-3500 thermal simulation testing machine. The experiments were conducted at various deformation temperatures (573 K, 623 K, 673 K, and 723 K), strain rates (0.01s −1 , 0.1s −1 , 1s −1 , and 10s −1 ), and a maximum deformation of 60%. By comprehensively accounting for the deformation conditions, the relationships between the material parameters α , n , S , f of TiB 2 /2024 alloy and the deformation temperature, strain, and strain rate were determined, leading to the modification of the Arrhenius model. A constitutive model for TiB 2 /2024 alloy was constructed using the Gene expression programming (GEP) approach. The flow stress of TiB 2 /2024 alloy during the compression process was predicted using both the modified Arrhenius model and the GEP model. The statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the two models, and the extended stress-strain data was implemented in finite element simulations of the hot compression process. The results indicate that the flow stress of TiB 2 /2024 alloy is significantly affected by the strain rate and temperature during the deformation process. The flow stress decreases with increasing temperature and increases with increasing strain rate. Both the modified Arrhenius model and the GEP model can effectively predict the alloy's flow stress. However, the modified Arrhenius model exhibits greater prediction accuracy than the GEP model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Cyclic deformation response of UFG 2024 al alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.11.025 ↗
2. Modeling and surface morphological study in drilling of Al 2024 alloy10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.025 ↗
3. Effect of inter layer cold work on 2024 aluminium alloy produced by wire directed energy deposition10.1016/j.msea.2023.145272 ↗
4. Alumoxane film for corrosion protection of 2024 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.192 ↗
5. Electrochemical characterization of aluminum alloy AA2024 − T3 influenced by bacteria from Antarctica10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.127 ↗
6. Laser powder bed fusion of nano-CaB6 decorated 2024 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158714 ↗
7. Fatigue life prediction of in-situ TiB2/2024 aluminum matrix composite10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106128 ↗
8. Investigation of the hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of TiB2 +TiAl3/2024Al composite10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167765 ↗
9. Microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ TiB2/2024 composites fabricated by powder metallurgy10.1007/s11665-022-06900-7 ↗
10. Modeling the creep behavior of 2024-T3 Al alloy
11. High-temperature dynamic deformation of aluminum alloys using SHPB10.1007/s12206-010-1106-9 ↗
12. Modeling of strain hardening and creep behaviour of 2024T3 aluminium alloy at room and high temperatures
13. High temperature performance of additively manufactured Al 2024 alloy: constitutive modelling, dynamic recrystallization evolution and kinetics10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.102 ↗
14. Hot deformation behaviors and processing maps of 2024 aluminum alloy in as-cast and homogenized states10.1007/s11665-015-1734-4 ↗
15. Hot deformation characteristics of 2024 aluminum alloy10.1007/s11665-023-08015-z ↗
16. Enhancing mechanical properties and improving mechanical anisotropy of__rolled 2024 Al sheet by TiB2 nanoparticles10.1016/j.msea.2023.145077 ↗
17. Enhancing mechanical properties of uniformly distributed nano TiB2_2024 Al composite rolling sheet by pre-stretch aging
18. Microstructure study of cold rolling nanosized in-situ TiB2 particle reinforced_Al composites10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.076 ↗
19. Flow stress of 2024 aluminum alloy during multi-directional forging process and natural aging after plastic deformation10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123446 ↗
20. Deformation behavior and characteristics of sintered porous 2024 aluminum alloy compressed in a semisolid state10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.120 ↗
21. A comparative study on the phenomenological and artificial neural network models to predict hot deformation behavior of AlCuMgPb alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.300 ↗
22. Constitutive analysis of homogenized 7005 aluminum alloy at evaluated temperature for extrusion process10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.045 ↗
23. Constitutive analysis of Mg–Al–Zn magnesium alloys during hot deformation10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.07.004 ↗
24. Hot deformation behavior and constitutive equation of a new type Al–Zn–Mg–Er–Zr alloy during isothermal compression10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.122 ↗
25. Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems
26. Ferreira · 2002
27. Prediction of essential proteins based on gene expression programming10.1186/1471-2164-14-S4-S7 ↗
28. Semi-autogenous mill power model development using gene expression programming10.1016/j.powtec.2016.11.045 ↗
29. Flow stress prediction of near-β Ti-55511 alloy during isothermal compression based on corrected Arrhenius model with material parameter evolution and BP-ANN model
30. A practical condition for migration dynamic recrystallization10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.026 ↗
31. Effects of strain rate on flow stress behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu aluminum alloy during hot deformation10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.027 ↗
32. Flow behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of A5083 aluminum alloys with different initial microstructures during hot compression10.1016/j.msea.2020.139522 ↗
33. Characterization of hot workability in AA 7050 aluminum alloy using activation energy and 3-D processing map10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.018 ↗
34. Correspondence between grain refinements and flow softening behaviors at Nimonic 80A superalloy under different strain rates, temperatures and strains10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.031 ↗
35. Constitutive modeling for high temperature flow behavior of a high-strength manganese brass10.1007/s11771-018-3848-y ↗
36. Arrhenius-type constitutive model for high temperature flow stress in a nickel-based corrosion-resistant alloy10.1007/s11665-016-1986-7 ↗