journal article·2024-06

Water ingress detection in an aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure using laser ultrasonics based on mode conversion behaviors

Zeyu Dong, Weikun Chen, Osamu Saito, Fengming Yu, Yoji Okabe

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper investigates the method for water ingress detection in an aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure by laser ultrasonics. To clarify the propagation of Scholte waves generated at the solid-liquid interface, the theoretical dispersion curves in the water-aluminum layered structure are calculated by the global matrix method. Using a laser ultrasonic visualizing inspector, the guided wave propagation in the wavefields has been visualized, which shows the mode conversion behaviors occurring in the water ingress area. The clarification of mode conversion is then investigated by the finite element method. The Scholte modes at the solid-fluid interface and the Lamb modes in the face sheet are interconverted because of the change in the waveguide structure. Wavenumber filter reconstruction and the resulting energy maps are applied to illustrate the mode conversion in the wavefields and to detect the water ingress area. Results show that the appearance of the water layer contributes to the mode conversion behaviors during the guided wave propagation in the honeycomb sandwich structure, which offers the potential for water ingress detection based on the mode conversion behaviors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Underwater Acoustics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan

Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo113-0033, Meguro-ku, Japan

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10000410.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004 ↗
2. 10.2514/1.3040810.2514/1.30408 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831037352210.1177/0021998310373522 ↗
4. Edwards AK · Ultragarsas · 2011 · 66 · 36
5. 10.1007/s00170-016-8744-810.1007/s00170-016-8744-8 ↗
6. 10.1177/109963621983664510.1177/1099636219836645 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665-997-0074-410.1007/s11665-997-0074-4 ↗
8. 10.1515/fas-2015-000410.1515/fas-2015-0004 ↗
9. Rastogi M · International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology · 2016 · 5 · 171
10. 10.3390/ma1506233310.3390/ma15062333 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.252162710.1117/12.2521627 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.01.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2005.01.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.10.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.10.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10246910.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102469 ↗
15. 10.3390/s2303114910.3390/s23031149 ↗
16. 10.1088/1742-6596/1184/1/01200110.1088/1742-6596/1184/1/012001 ↗
17. 10.1177/1099636223115918510.1177/10996362231159185 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6501/acae2710.1088/1361-6501/acae27 ↗
19. 10.1299/jmmp.1.140510.1299/jmmp.1.1405 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10706310.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107063 ↗
21. 10.1017/CBO978110727361010.1017/CBO9781107273610 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-1-84882-784-410.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗