Prediction and optimization of bending performance of bio-based I-joists with sandwich web using MNLR–GA modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Bio-based sandwich I-joists have attracted increasing attention as sustainable alternatives to conventional load-bearing wood products; however, the bending performance of hybrid lignocellulosic sandwich webs remains insufficiently understood due to the complex interactions among material composition and structural configuration. In this study, the bending behavior of bio-based I-shaped sandwich beams composed of laminated veneer lumber (LVL) flanges and multilayer sandwich web cores made from cattail–poplar particles were systematically investigated. The effects of key structural parameters, including web core density, number of kraft-paper-separated web layers, and jute fabric surface density, on the modulus of rupture (MOR) were evaluated through three-point bending tests. A multivariate nonlinear regression (MNLR) model was developed to explicitly describe the nonlinear dependence of bending strength on the studied parameters, and regularization was applied to improve model stability and limit overfitting. Model performance was assessed using R 2 , RMSE , and MAE , and the validated MNLR model was subsequently coupled with a genetic algorithm (GA) to identify optimal web architectures that maximize bending performance. The results demonstrate that the number of web layers is the most influential parameter governing MOR, followed by core density, while the contribution of jute surface density is comparatively weaker. Scanning electron microscopy observations further revealed that increasing the number of web layers reduces core porosity and enhances interfacial bonding, thereby promoting more efficient stress transfer under bending loads. Overall, this integrated experimental and data-driven framework provides a reliable basis for predicting and optimizing the bending performance of hybrid lignocellulosic sandwich I-joists.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shahid Beheshti University
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Leichti RJ, Falk RH, Laufenberg TL. Prefabricated wood I-joists: an industry overview. For Prod J 1990; 40: 15–20.
2. 10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-000310.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0003 ↗
3. 10.2174/187483680191301000110.2174/1874836801913010001 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10311-023-01689-w10.1007/s10311-023-01689-w ↗
5. 10.29187/jscmt.2019.3410.29187/jscmt.2019.34 ↗
6. 10.32604/jrm.2020.0961510.32604/jrm.2020.09615 ↗
7. 10.1002/gch2.20240018310.1002/gch2.202400183 ↗
8. Bhuvaneswari V, Rajeshkumar L, Sathishkumar TP, et al. Effect of fiber orientation on physical and mechanical properties of Typha angustifolia natural fiber reinforced composites. Appl Sci Eng Prog 2023; 16: 6497–6507.
9. 10.3390/polym1619269210.3390/polym16192692 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.10684710.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106847 ↗
11. 10.3389/fpls.2024.134814410.3389/fpls.2024.1348144 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1624355910.3390/polym16243559 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1714349310.3390/ma17143493 ↗
14. 10.3390/jcs709036410.3390/jcs7090364 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11104610.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.111046 ↗
16. Zeinali M, Rahimi G, Hosseini S. Estimation of buckling load in sandwich beams with novel honeycomb core: a non-destructive approach enhanced by machine learning and genetic algorithm optimization. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2025; 0219–4554.
17. 10.1016/j.csite.2025.10711410.1016/j.csite.2025.107114 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00366-015-0416-z10.1007/s00366-015-0416-z ↗
19. 10.3390/jcs702005710.3390/jcs7020057 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11235410.1016/j.measurement.2022.112354 ↗
21. 10.17221/95/2021-JFS10.17221/95/2021-JFS ↗
22. 10.1186/s10086-023-02096-z10.1186/s10086-023-02096-z ↗
23. Garcia Fernandez F, García Esteban L, Palacios de Palacios PD, et al. Prediction of standard particleboard mechanical properties utilizing an artificial neural network and subsequent comparison with a multivariate regression model. Investig Agrar: Sist Rec For 2008; 17: 178–187.
24. 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.10896710.1016/j.rineng.2026.108967 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11676-011-0207-310.1007/s11676-011-0207-3 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13478510.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134785 ↗
27. Leckie FA, Dal Bello DJ. Strength and stiffness of engineering systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer, 2009, p. 696.
28. 10.1108/RJTA-16-02-2012-B00410.1108/RJTA-16-02-2012-B004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bej.2008.05.00910.1016/j.bej.2008.05.009 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00165-110.1016/S0022-1694(99)00165-1 ↗
31. 10.3390/jcs712051810.3390/jcs7120518 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3368110.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33681 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1713185210.3390/polym17131852 ↗
34. 10.1007/s42452-025-07616-810.1007/s42452-025-07616-8 ↗
35. Bishop C. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, 2006.
36. 10.3390/polym1611158910.3390/polym16111589 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.02910.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.029 ↗
38. 10.1098/rspa.1995.007610.1098/rspa.1995.0076 ↗
39. 10.3139/120.11131110.3139/120.111311 ↗
40. 10.3732/ajb.110032410.3732/ajb.1100324 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1419394210.3390/polym14193942 ↗
42. 10.3390/jcs904018210.3390/jcs9040182 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41598-025-18944-510.1038/s41598-025-18944-5 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.019 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y ↗
46. 10.3390/f1504062010.3390/f15040620 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.043 ↗