Flexural and axial behaviour of sandwich panels with bio-based flax fibre-reinforced polymer skins and various foam core densities
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of foam core density on the behaviour of sandwich panels with novel bio-composite unidirectional flax fibre-reinforced polymer skins, along with a comparison to panels of conventional glass-FRP skins. Eighteen 1000 mm long flexural specimens and 18 500 mm long stub column specimens were fabricated and tested. All specimens had a foam core of 100 × 50 mm 2 cross-section with symmetrical 100 mm wide skins. The study compares the effect of three separate polyisocyanurate foam cores when used in conjunction with either three layers of flax fibre-reinforced polymer or a single glass-FRP layer for each skin. Flexural specimens were tested in four-point bending and stub columns were tested under axial compression with pin–pin end conditions. Doubling the core density from 32 to 64 kg/m 3 and tripling the density to 96 kg/m 3 led to flexural strength increases of 82 and 213%, respectively, for flax fibre-reinforced polymer skinned panels, and comparable increases in glass-FRP skinned panels. Similarly, flax fibre-reinforced polymer-skinned columns showed similar increases in ultimate axial capacity of 85% and 196%, while glass-FRP- skinned columns experienced lower increases when core density was varied. The three-layered flax fibre-reinforced polymer skin, only 17% thicker than the single layer glass-FRP skin, was shown to provide equivalent flexural and axial strengths at all three core densities, within −5 to +13%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.15554/pcij.11012015.51.7110.15554/pcij.11012015.51.71 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-1-4020-3225-710.1007/978-1-4020-3225-7 ↗
3. Mathieson H · J Compos Constr · 2013 · 18 · 9
4. 10.1177/002199831036957710.1177/0021998310369577 ↗
5. 10.1177/002199830708796510.1177/0021998307087965 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000056010.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000560 ↗
7. Manalo A · ASCE J Compos Construct
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(454)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(454) ↗
9. Van Erp G and Rogers D. A highly sustainable fibre composite building panel. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on fibre composites in civil infrastructure – past, present and future , Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, 1–2 December, University of Southern Queensland.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000017610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000176 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000042310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000423 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000030710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000307 ↗
13. Van Erp G and McKay D. Reinforced lignin polymer beams: a direct replacement for hardwood bridge beams. In: Proceedings of the 5th Australian small bridges conference , Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, pp.1–9.
14. Qiao P, Yang M, Mosallam A, et al. An over-height collision protection system of sandwich polymer composites integrated with remote monitoring for concrete bridge girders. FHWA/OH-2008/6 Report, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.
15. Cicala G, Cristaldi G, Recca G, et al. Woven Fabric Engineering. In: Polona D Dubrovski (ed.) ISBN: 978-953-307-194-7, InTech. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/woven-fabric-engineering/composites-based-on-naturalfibre-fabrics.
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.024 ↗
18. Sadeghian P · J Sandwich Struct Mater
19. Composites Evolution. Biotex flax unidirectional fabric, technical data sheet, www.compositesevolution.com/Portals/0/Biotex%20Flax%20Unidirectional%20TDS%20March%202012.pdf (accessed 1 September 2015).
20. Fyfe Co. LLC. Tyfo SEH-51A composite using Tyfo S epoxy, www.fyfeco.com/Products/∼/media/Files/Fyfe/2013-Products/Tyfo%20SEH-51A%20Comp.ashx (accessed 1 September 2015).
21. Elliott Company. ELFOAM technical data, www.elliottfoam.com/tech.html (accessed 1 September 2015).
22. ASTM. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. C365, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
23. ASTM. Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. C297, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.