Effects of parameters on postbuckling failure of composite sandwich panels loaded axially: Function form and applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the refined first-order shear theory (simplified zig-zag model), using quasi-conforming finite element method with path-following and switching approach, the postbuckling behaviors and postbuckling bearing capacity (PBC) of composite sandwich panels (CSPs) axially loaded were studied and discussed in detail. To utilize the carrying potential of CSPs in postbuckling, the effects of the key parameters on postbuckling behaviors of the CSPs were analyzed by finite element method. The numerical results show that the PBC of CSPs increases with the increase of face sheets thickness, core thickness and core shear modulus, but it is insensitive to the change of the side length ratio. The enhancement of core shear strength can increase the PBC of CSPs and change the failure mode, but it is found there is a threshold value, beyond which, the PBC will no longer or slightly increases with the increase of core shear strength. The failure of CSPs is mainly determined by the tensile strength in the direction perpendicular to the fiber. Finally, a parameter selection optimization approach is proposed to effectively improve the PBC of CSPs under axial compression.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Funding
Key Research and Development Program of Liaoning Province · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang X, Lan Q, Zhong Y. Buckling analysis and experiment of fiber-paper honeycomb sandwich structure composites. In: International Conference on Advanced Design and Manufacturing Engineering (ADME 2011), Guangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, 2011. Sep 16-18 2011, Advanced manufacturing technology, pts 1-3, pp. 566.
2. 10.1088/1361-665x/26/2/02501410.1088/1361-665x/26/2/025014 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10610510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106105 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-016-9992-610.1007/s10853-016-9992-6 ↗
5. 10.1002/pssb.20200050310.1002/pssb.202000503 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-017-1809-810.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11446610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114466 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac7e0d10.1088/1361-665X/ac7e0d ↗
9. 10.1007/s00339-022-05280-y10.1007/s00339-022-05280-y ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac47c010.1088/1361-6463/ac47c0 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac6d3310.1088/1361-665X/ac6d33 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab669610.1088/1361-665X/ab6696 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11264010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112640 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11533210.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115332 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.10485110.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104851 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.05010.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10713310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107133 ↗
18. 10.1016/s0020-7462(01)00065-810.1016/s0020-7462(01)00065-8 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10443-004-6138-910.1007/s10443-004-6138-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.020 ↗
21. 10.1177/109963621349933910.1177/1099636213499339 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2012.04.01310.1016/j.tws.2012.04.013 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.317375810.1115/1.3173758 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.197891910.1115/1.1978919 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.08.01210.1016/j.tws.2013.08.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00154-510.1016/s0263-8223(03)00154-5 ↗
27. 10.2514/1.J05224710.2514/1.J052247 ↗
28. 10.1177/109963620706841910.1177/1099636207068419 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11403710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114037 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.008 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.403995310.1115/1.4039953 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.403995410.1115/1.4039954 ↗
33. Pineda EJ, Myers DE, Bednarcyk BA, et al. A Numerical study on the effect of facesheet-core disbonds on the buckling load of curved honeycomb sandwich panels. In: 30th Technical Conference of the American-Society-for-Composites, East Lansing, MI, 2015 Sep 28-30 2015, Proceedings of the american society for composites: Thirtieth technical conference, pp. 1637–1656.
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.039 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.023 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.02510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.025 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.02310.1016/j.cma.2004.01.023 ↗
38. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab2b7410.1088/2053-1591/ab2b74 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11012-020-01174-610.1007/s11012-020-01174-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)00066-210.1016/0263-8223(94)00066-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.07210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.072 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11325810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113258 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.031 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.01710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.017 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.040 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cma.2015.11.03010.1016/j.cma.2015.11.030 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.01410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.014 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.01.01110.1016/j.ast.2017.01.011 ↗
49. 10.1016/s0263-8223(98)00067-110.1016/s0263-8223(98)00067-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00098-310.1016/s0263-8223(02)00098-3 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.002 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.019 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ast.2019.10546310.1016/j.ast.2019.105463 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0035023110.1007/BF00350231 ↗
55. 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00623-b10.1016/0045-7949(94)00623-b ↗
56. 10.1016/s0263-8223(98)00067-110.1016/s0263-8223(98)00067-1 ↗
57. Bai RX · 2002