journal article·2022-02

Influence of geometric parameters on free vibration behavior of an aluminum honeycomb core sandwich beam using experimentally validated finite element models

Vahid Pourriahi, Mohammad Heidari-Rarani, Amir Torabpour Isfahani

Publisher page

Abstract

The hexagonal honeycomb core sandwich panels used in the satellite structure are subjected to severe vibration during launch. Therefore, the amounts of natural frequencies of these panels are of great importance for design engineers. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of the core considering all geometric parameters (i.e., a high-fidelity model) to achieve accurate results is not cost-effective. The honeycomb core is traditionally equivalent to a homogenized continuum core (i.e., a low-fidelity model) using simple analytical relations with ignoring the adhesive layer at the double cell-walls and radius of inclined cell-wall curvature. In this study, analytical formulations are first presented for the prediction of the equivalent elastic properties of a hexagonal aluminum honeycomb with considering all geometric parameters including adhesive layer thickness, cell-wall thickness, inclined cell-wall length, radius of inclined cell-wall curvature at the intersection, internal cell-wall angle, and honeycomb height. Then, two aluminum honeycomb core sandwich beams with free-free boundary conditions are modeled and analyzed in Abaqus finite element software, one with 3D high-fidelity core and the other with 3D low-fidelity core. In order to validate the results of the equivalent model, the modal analysis test was performed and the experimental natural frequencies were compared. The obtained results show a good agreement between the 3D low-fidelity and high-fidelity finite element models and experimental results. In addition, the influence of the above-mentioned geometric parameters has been investigated on the natural frequencies of a sandwich beam. [Formula: see text]
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Department of New Materials and Alloys, Institute of Materials and Energy, Isfahan, Iran.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00027-710.1016/S0263-8223(01)00027-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.18210.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.182 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.07.00210.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.07.002 ↗
6. Lashin MM · IOSR J Mech Civil Eng Ver · 2015 · 12 · 2278
7. 10.1177/073168441983649210.1177/0731684419836492 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-94-011-5856-510.1007/978-94-011-5856-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.009 ↗
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.940.22610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.940.226 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.021 ↗
12. Gibson LJ · 1999
13. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.02610.1016/j.ast.2016.08.026 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00218-610.1016/S0263-8223(03)00218-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.21310.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.213 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.09.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2017.09.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.007 ↗
21. 10.5267/j.esm.2019.9.00210.5267/j.esm.2019.9.002 ↗
22. Bai Z · 2008 · 1
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.019 ↗
24. 10.1109/CSAE.2011.595317510.1109/CSAE.2011.5953175 ↗
25. Israr A · Shock Vib · 2014 · 2014 · 8
26. Li-Tong W · 2018
27. Luo H · Shock Vib · 2019 · 2019 · 1
28. 10.12783/dtcse/cmsms2018/2518310.12783/dtcse/cmsms2018/25183 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.426-427.47210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.426-427.472 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00158-016-1479-110.1007/s00158-016-1479-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.01210.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.012 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10409-009-0230-110.1007/s10409-009-0230-1 ↗
33. Shrigandhi GD · Int J Curr Eng Technol · 2016 · 4 · 259
34. Jweeg MJ · Int J Mech Mechat Eng IJMME-IJENS · 2016 · 16 · 1
35. 10.2174/1874155X0150901104510.2174/1874155X01509011045 ↗
36. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.326.110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.326.1 ↗
37. Şakar G · Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mech Manuf Eng · 2015 · 9 · 1077
38. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.00810.1016/j.tws.2018.11.008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10642510.1016/j.tws.2019.106425 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.04510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.045 ↗