Investigation of the numerical, experimental, statistical and optimization of thin-walled energy absorber with novel configuration using response surface method under axial loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, aluminum thin-walled cylindrical absorbers for crashworthiness are investigated to introduce a novel system with better energy absorption and crushing characteristics under quasi-static axial compressive loading. The inside of the thin-walled cylinders is meshed with a square welded from vertices to the thin-walled cylinder. Here, the response surface method, which is one of the design of experiments techniques has been used to examine the effect of the parameters on energy absorption, initial peak crushing force, specific energy absorption per unit mass and energy absorption per length. The variables of thickness (t), height (h) and length of square (l) of the thin-walled cylinder were considered in three levels and initial peak crushing force, specific energy absorption per unit mass and energy absorption per length were selected as response. The specimens were analyzed under a quasi-static compressive test at a constant speed of 10 mm/min. Subsequently, for further investigation, the experimental results were compared with those obtained from the finite element simulation using Abaqus software, which indicated desirable accuracy. To decrease the solution time in this numerical analysis, the speed was set at 0.5 m/s. Finally, the experimental results were compared with the simulation ones, which showed acceptable compatibility. Further, there are the equations obtained from the multi-objective optimization testing design. The results indicated a linear relationship of thickness with responses, nonlinear relationship of height with responses, linear relationship of length of square with initial peak crushing force, and nonlinear relationship with specific energy absorption per unit mass and energy absorption per length.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00048-310.1016/S0263-8231(00)00048-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.01.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.01.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.06.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.06.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.01.00410.1016/j.tws.2015.01.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.03.02310.1016/j.tws.2015.03.023 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.10.00510.1016/j.tws.2013.10.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.01010.1016/j.tws.2013.01.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2010.07.00310.1016/j.tws.2010.07.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.01910.1016/j.tws.2016.01.019 ↗
10. Olabi AGÃ, Morris E, Hashmi MSJ. Metallic tube type energy absorbers: a synopsis. Thin-Walled Struct 2007; 45: 706–726.10.1016/j.tws.2007.05.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.12.00810.1016/j.tws.2016.12.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.01210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.012 ↗
13. Najafi A, Rais-Rohani M. Influence of cross-sectional geometry on crush characteristics of multi-cell prismatic columns. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference , Schaumburg, IL, 7–10 April 2008. DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-2014.10.2514/6.2008-2014 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tws.2010.07.00210.1016/j.tws.2010.07.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.02.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.02.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.01410.1016/j.tws.2013.03.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2012.05.01910.1016/j.tws.2012.05.019 ↗
19. Ciubotariu VA. Collapse behavior of dynamically crashed hexagonal thin walled structures with multi-cell cross-section geometry. Journal of Engineering Studies and Research 2014; 20: 14–20.10.29081/jesr.v20i2.70 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.10.02610.1016/j.tws.2017.10.026 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.01810.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018 ↗
22. Baroutaji A · 2017
23. 10.1108/EC-11-2012-030010.1108/EC-11-2012-0300 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2011.08.00910.1016/j.tws.2011.08.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.02210.1016/j.tws.2016.11.022 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.00210.1016/j.tws.2015.07.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.08.02910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.08.029 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.finel.2015.06.00410.1016/j.finel.2015.06.004 ↗
29. 10.1177/095440621562718110.1177/0954406215627181 ↗
30. 10.1108/EC-08-2015-024510.1108/EC-08-2015-0245 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.03.02910.1016/j.tws.2015.03.029 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.11.01610.1016/j.tws.2015.11.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.08.02110.1016/j.tws.2016.08.021 ↗
34. 10.1080/13588265.2016.125895810.1080/13588265.2016.1258958 ↗
35. Altin M · Int J Crashworthiness · 2017 · 8265 · 1
36. Li YF, Wang YL, He Yet al. Modeling method for flexible energy behaviors in CNC machining systems. Chinese J Mech Eng 2018; 31: 1–1110.1186/s10033-018-0213-x ↗
37. Chai S, Ji XF, Li LJet al. Multivariate rational response surface approximation of nodal displacements of truss structures. Chinese J Mech Eng 2018; 31: 1.10.1186/s10033-018-0219-4 ↗
38. Ma YL, Tan JR, Wang DLet al. Light-weight design method for force ‑ performance ‑ structure of complex structural part based co ‑ operative optimization. Chinese J Mech Eng 2018; 31: 42.10.1186/s10033-018-0236-3 ↗
39. Yaghoobi H, Fereidoon A. Modeling and optimization of tensile strength and modulus of polypropylene/kenaf fiber biocomposites using Box-Behnken response surface method. Poly Compos 2018; 39: E463–E479.10.1002/pc.24596 ↗
40. Yaghoobi H, Fereidoon A. An experimental investigation and optimization on the impact strength of kenaf fiber biocomposite: application of response surface methodology. Polym Bull 2018; 75: 3283–3309.10.1007/s00289-017-2212-y ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.06.00110.1016/j.tws.2015.06.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.05910.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.059 ↗
43. 10.1080/13588265.2017.128108110.1080/13588265.2017.1281081 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.07.01110.1016/j.tws.2015.07.011 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.02.00710.1016/j.tws.2008.02.007 ↗
46. 10.1002/wics.7310.1002/wics.73 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.03410.1016/j.jece.2016.12.034 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.03210.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.032 ↗
49. 10.1080/00224065.1980.1198096810.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.01.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.01.005 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.18410.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.184 ↗
52. Myers R · 2016
53. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.03410.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.034 ↗
54. 10.1080/00401706.1960.1048991210.1080/00401706.1960.10489912 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.01110.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011 ↗