Investigation of flexural behavior of 3D textile reinforced concrete using both experimental tests and finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the influence of 3D fabric on the flexural behavior of cementitious composites has been investigated. Three 3D fabric samples were produced with different spacer yarn orientation angles of 65°, 55°, and 47°. The cementitious matrix was fabricated by cement and waste stone powder. After casting of all samples, flexural test was carried out on all specimens. Results showed that cementitious sample reinforced by 3D fabric with less spacer yarn orientation angle proposed the highest flexural strength among all samples (reinforced and unreinforced samples). Moreover, finite element method was used to predict the flexural behavior of textile reinforced concrete. Finite element method results showed good agreement with the experimental data. Consequently, the maximum spacer yarn stress derived by finite element analysis was used to calculate the efficiency reinforcement factor for all the textile reinforced concrete samples.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-8311, Iran.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00120-410.1016/0263-8223(95)00120-4 ↗
3. 10.1177/00405175030730010710.1177/004051750307300107 ↗
4. 10.1201/978148226774710.1201/9781482267747 ↗
5. 10.1002/suco.20139001010.1002/suco.201390010 ↗
6. Hegger J and Horstmann M. Light-weight TRC sandwich building envelopes. In: Proceedings of the international conference on “Excellence in Concrete Construction through Innovation” , 2008, pp. 187–194. London, UK: Kensington University.10.1201/9780203883440.ch27 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.169 ↗
8. 10.1617/s11527-006-9140-x10.1617/s11527-006-9140-x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.006 ↗
10. 10.1106/15280830202661910.1106/152808302026619 ↗
11. 10.1177/152808370910293810.1177/1528083709102938 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.025 ↗
13. Hanisch V, Kolkmann A, Roye A, et al. Influence of machine settings on mechanical performance of yarns and textile structures. In: Proceedings of the 1st international RILEM symposium (Textile Reinforced Concrete ICTRC) , RILEM TC201-TRC2006, 2006, pp. 13–22. Venue: Aachen.10.1617/2351580087.002 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12221-009-0116-710.1007/s12221-009-0116-7 ↗
15. Brameshuber W. Report 36: Textile reinforced concrete-state-of-the-art. Report of RILEM TC 201-TRC, RILEM Publications, 2006.
16. 10.1177/004051750809779010.1177/0040517508097790 ↗
17. 10.1177/152808370707813610.1177/1528083707078136 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.04110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.041 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10163-010-0297-610.1007/s10163-010-0297-6 ↗
20. Haque M · Pan · 2011 · 10 · 100
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.06010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.060 ↗
22. 10.1177/152808371456723910.1177/1528083714567239 ↗
23. C150 A · 2012
24. C393 A · 2000
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:1(41)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:1(41) ↗
26. Narasimhan MN · 1993
27. Gonzalez LYS, Botero MG and Betancur M. Hyperelastic material modeling, Departamento de Ingenieria Mecanica . Medellïn, Colombia: Universidad EAFIT, 2005.
28. Basar Y · 2013
29. Ogden RW · 1997
30. D4595 A · 2009
31. D4833 A · 2013
32. ASTM-C348 · 2000
33. C349 A · 1999
34. SIMULIA · 2012