journal article·2024-02Open access

Mechanical performance of sandwich materials with reduced environmental impact for marine structures

Alban Robin, Peter Davies, Mael Arhant, Sebastian Le Jeune, Nicolas Lacotte, Eliaz Morineau, Fanny Ioos, Pascal Dourlen, Raphael Cairo

Abstract

Glass fibre reinforced composite facings on PVC (poly(vinyl chloride)) foam cores are widely used sandwich materials in boat structures, but life cycle analysis suggests that alternative materials may be preferable for the environment. However, in order to design with these alternative materials their mechanical behaviour must be characterized and understood. This paper describes an experimental campaign to evaluate the performance of alternative sandwich materials with reduced environmental impact, under loading conditions relevant to boat design. Flax and bamboo composite faced PET (poly(ethylene terephthalate)) foam sandwich materials are compared to the current PVC foam sandwich on a constant weight basis. A series of quasi-static tests is described first and analysed. Then hard and soft impact tests are described, which allow a comparison to be made between existing and alternative sandwich options. The results indicate that the alternative materials show lower flexural stiffness. Damage initiation levels are also lower, but the impact energy levels they can support are promising, and facing improvements could raise these further.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Marine Structures Laboratory, IFREMER Centre Bretagne, Plouzané, France

MerConcept, Concarneau, France

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12289-018-1455-y10.1007/s12289-018-1455-y ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000085610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000856 ↗
4. 10.1177/109963621666765810.1177/1099636216667658 ↗
5. 10.1016/0956-7143(95)95011-M10.1016/0956-7143(95)95011-M ↗
6. Arhant M · 2018 · 31
7. 10.1115/IMECE2000-201910.1115/IMECE2000-2019 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-610.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
9. 10.1177/109963620707057410.1177/1099636207070574 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00159-910.1016/S0263-8223(02)00159-9 ↗
11. Zenkert D · 1995
12. 2018
13. Armacell Recycled PET Environmental Product Declaration, January 2022, ArmaPET Eco50, https://local.armacell.com/fileadmin/cms/pet-foams/ArmaPET_website/Product_Flyer/ArmaPET_Eco50_EPD-komprimiert.pdf
14. 10.3390/ma203077610.3390/ma2030776 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.08410.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.084 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10683410.1016/j.tws.2020.106834 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000040910.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000409 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10942610.1016/j.tws.2022.109426 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.053 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199831453359710.1177/0021998314533597 ↗
22. ISO 12215 · 2008
23. 10.1039/D1RA03023J10.1039/D1RA03023J ↗
24. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.01.01710.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.01.017 ↗
25. International Monohull Open Class Association (IMOCA) · 2021
26. 2021
27. ASTM C365-03 · 2003
28. 2000
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.002 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_510.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_5 ↗
31. 10.1166/jbmb.2011.117810.1166/jbmb.2011.1178 ↗
32. Dolega J · 2015