Optimizing sandwich beams for strength and stiffness
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents a method for minimizing structural mass by optimizing the geometry and core density of sandwich beams comprising composite face sheets and polymer foam cores, loaded in three-point bending. The optimization is constrained by both strength and stiffness requirements. All possible locations in design space which might be global minima of mass are identified, and it is shown that, for a global minimum mass, at least two constraints must be simultaneously active. Calculations for a typical set of material properties are performed with the result that, for a wide range of standard materials, a minimum-mass sandwich beam satisfying both strength and stiffness requirements utilizes low-density foam and is constrained by stiffness and indentation strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-012870-2.50012-210.1016/B978-0-08-012870-2.50012-2 ↗
2. Zenkert D · 1995
3. 10.1106/10567890202724710.1106/105678902027247 ↗
4. 10.1557/mrs2001.20610.1557/mrs2001.206 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00327-910.1016/S0020-7683(00)00327-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00241-X10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00241-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.01.00710.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.01.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90199-Z10.1016/0263-8223(93)90199-Z ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(1026)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(1026) ↗
10. 10.1016/0025-5416(87)90497-610.1016/0025-5416(87)90497-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0079-6425(97)00034-010.1016/S0079-6425(97)00034-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00169-310.1016/S0020-7683(98)00169-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00069-210.1016/S0020-7403(00)00069-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.015 ↗
17. 10.1177/109963620200400313910.1177/1099636202004003139 ↗
18. 10.1177/109963620809574110.1177/1099636208095741 ↗
19. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
20. DIAB International. Divinycell technical specification H grade. DIAB International, Sweden, 2007.
21. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.004 ↗
22. Ashby MF · 2000
23. 10.1163/092430409X1253006733928010.1163/092430409X12530067339280 ↗
24. Simulia DS · 2009
25. Chen C, Fleck NA. A creep model for polymeric foams. Technical Report CUED/C-MICROMECH/TR.32, Cambridge Centre for Micromechanics, University of Cambridge, July 2000.
26. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
27. Evonik Industries. Rohacell technical specification A grade. Evonik Industries, Essen, Germany, 2009.
28. 10.1007/s10853-010-4250-910.1007/s10853-010-4250-9 ↗