journal article·2020-02

Geometrical nonlinear characteristics of functionally graded structure using functionally graded piezoelectric materials

CK Susheel, Anshul Sharma, Rajeev Kumar, Vishal S Chauhan

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present article, a parametric study on the geometric nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of thin functionally graded structure sandwiched between functionally graded piezoelectric materials is presented. The properties of functionally graded material are graded in the thickness direction according to a power law distribution and variation of electric field is assumed to be quadratic across the thickness of functionally graded piezoelectric materials layers. The structure is modeled using finite element modeling. The finite element formulation is derived using Hamilton’s principle using full geometric nonlinearities. This is done by using Green-Lagrangian strains instead of von-Karman strains which are usually used by most researchers while conducting similar studies. The ensued non-linear algebraic equations are then solved using the modified Newton–Raphson method. A fuzzy logic controller is used to attenuate the vibration occurring in the host structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Numerical methods in engineering · Railway Engineering and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand, Uttarakhand, India

School of Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, India

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00264-X10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00264-X ↗
2. 10.1016/0924-4247(95)00996-510.1016/0924-4247(95)00996-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00381-910.1016/S0924-4247(03)00381-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1468-6996(02)00017-710.1016/S1468-6996(02)00017-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00418-310.1016/S0020-7683(02)00418-3 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00419-004-0346-510.1007/s00419-004-0346-5 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X0505010010.1177/1045389X05050100 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/02810.1088/0964-1726/16/3/028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.06.00710.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.06.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.009 ↗
11. 10.1177/1045389X1557201210.1177/1045389X15572012 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11504010.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115040 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.088 ↗
14. 10.1177/1045389X1246107910.1177/1045389X12461079 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.04510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.045 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.09.00810.1016/j.jmps.2013.09.008 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/12/12501810.1088/0964-1726/25/12/125018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.011 ↗
20. 10.1108/eb02356210.1108/eb023562 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03503110.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035031 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00048-810.1016/S0020-7683(01)00048-8 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.400076810.1115/1.4000768 ↗
24. Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures . New Jersy, Prentice-Hall, 1996.
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/12/12504010.1088/0964-1726/22/12/125040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.062 ↗
27. 10.1002/nme.25210.1002/nme.252 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00050-010.1016/S0020-7683(00)00050-0 ↗