Thermally induced microcracks and mechanical property of composite honeycomb sandwich structure: Experiment and finite element analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Microcracking in composite honeycomb sandwich structure and its effect on mechanical properties are studied in this paper. A methodology is presented to study the extent of mechanical strength degradation of composite sandwich structure, subjected to thermal fatigue. The material under study is used for spacecraft structural applications. The test coupons were exposed to thermal cycling at elevated temperature as high as +150°C inside the oven and cryogenic temperature of −190°C by dipping in liquid nitrogen, which is comparable to the thermal environment experienced by spacecraft structures. After each thermal cycle, coupons were inspected for microcracks under an optical microscope at the cross section. The microcracks were then quantified using parameters like crack length and crack density with increase in the number of cycles. Flatwise tensile test was conducted on the coupons after every 10 thermal cycles, up to 60 cycles, to make a correlation between crack density and mechanical strength. It was observed that by increasing the number of thermal cycles, the crack density increases and the flatwise tensile strength decreases up to a specific number of cycles. Finite element analysis was performed to predict the possible location of microcracks formation and compared with experimental observation. Good correlation was observed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Concordia Centre for Composites, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Niu MCY. Composite airframe structures . Hong Kong: Conmilit Press Ltd.
2. Stephen W. Tsai, introduction to composite materials . Lancaster, PA, USA: Technomic Publishing Co.Inc.
3. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-810.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8 ↗
4. Kirch MT. Composite crew model: primary structure. NASA Technical Report Server, 1 November 2011, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20110020665
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.028 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00126-910.1016/S1359-835X(01)00126-9 ↗
7. Chen H, et al. Thermal expansion of honeycomb sandwich panels. Reprinted from Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Expansion, ICCM, Paris, France, 13–16 June 1999.
8. Grimsley BW, Cano RJ, Johnston NJ, et al. Hybrid composites for LH2 fluid tank structure. NASA Technical Report Server , 1 January 2001, USA, www.ntrs.nasa.gov
9. 10.1023/A:101434422814110.1023/A:1014344228141 ↗
10. Tompkins SS. Effect of thermal cycling of composite material on space structure. NASA Technical Report Server , 1 May 1989, 447-470, USA, www.ntrs.nasa.gov
11. Wienhold PD, et al. The development of high-temperature composite solar array substrate panels for the messenger spacecraft. In: SAMPE technical conference , Salt Lake City, UT, 11–14 October 2010.
12. Gupta SKet al. Micro-crack detection technique in polymeric composites during thermal cycling. In: 21st International conference on composite materials , Xi’an, China, 20–25 August 2017.
13. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.033 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.03210.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.032 ↗
15. 10.1177/07316844880070020510.1177/073168448800700205 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00070-610.1016/S0142-1123(01)00070-6 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199830203600746910.1177/0021998302036007469 ↗
18. Gupta SK, Hojjati M. Thermal cycle effects on laminated composite plates containing voids. J Compos Mater 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0021998318786785.10.1177/0021998318786785 ↗
19. Polishing Machine, Mecatech 234, https://www.presi.com/en/polishing-machines/252-mecatech-234.html
20. ProgRes ® Speed XT core microscope camera, http://www.rsepl.com/Progres-speedxt.php
21. 10.1361/10599499977034642210.1361/105994999770346422 ↗
22. Mahdavi S, Kumar Gupta S, Hojjati M. Thermal cycling of out-of-autoclave thermosetting composite materials. In: Canadian international conference on composite materials , Ottawa, Canada, 14–17 July 2017.
23. Mahdavi S. Thermal cycling of out‐of‐autoclave thermosetting composite materials . MASc Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
24. ASTM Standard C297-04. Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010, pp.19428-2959, www.astm.org
25. Hysol®, EA 9392, Epoxy Paste Adhesive, Technical Data Sheet, https://northerncomposites.com/docs/default-source/data-sheets/hysol_ea_9392-en.pdf?sfvrsn=2
26. ANSYS Workbench Users Guide, Release 12.1 . PA, USA: ANSYS Inc., 2009.
27. Carraro PA, et al. Influence of manufacturing induced defects on damage initiation and propagation in carbon/epoxy NCF laminates. Advanced Manufacturing: Polymer and Composite Science , 8 December 2014; 1: 44–53.10.1179/2055035914Y.0000000004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.017 ↗