Flutter stability analysis of a perforated damping blade for large wind turbines
Source abstract
Abstract
The flutter stability of wind turbine blades is one of the important contents in the research of wind turbines. The bending stiffness of blades has decreased with the development of large-sized wind turbines. To achieve damping flutter-suppressing on the long spanwise blades, perforated damping blade was proposed under the consideration of the structural damping factor and the structural stiffness in this paper. Through the study of the unit cell, the deformation model was established and the structural loss factor of the perforated damping blade was derived. The undamped blade and the perforated damping blade, combined with the relevant parameters of a 1500 kW wind turbine blade, were established to simulate the flutter-suppressing abilities and the structural stability. The dynamic response analysis was accomplished with the large deformation theory, and the MPC algorithm was used to realize grid mobile and data delivery, according to the Newmark time integration method. The comparison results show that the perforated damping blade has both a higher structural damping factor and a better structural stiffness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Wind Energy Research and Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12116-007-9012-610.1007/s12116-007-9012-6 ↗
2. 10.1002/we.9010.1002/we.90 ↗
3. 10.1002/we.186910.1002/we.1869 ↗
4. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/24/3/033001 ↗
5. 10.1002/stc.40410.1002/stc.404 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.01110.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.011 ↗
7. 10.1002/we.41310.1002/we.413 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cap.2009.11.03610.1016/j.cap.2009.11.036 ↗
9. Mo WW · J Sound Vib · 2013 · 32 · 99
10. Lei TS · Acta Energi Sin · 2010 · 31 · 367
11. 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.0070510.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00705 ↗
12. Ren YS · J Sound Vib · 2010 · 29 · 121
13. Ren YS · J Sound Vib · 2010 · 29 · 196
14. Ren YS · J Sound Vib · 2011 · 30 · 64
15. Ren YS · J Sound Vib · 2011 · 47 · 113
16. 10.3397/1/37638810.3397/1/376388 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.03.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2005.03.008 ↗
18. Robinson MJ · Smart Mater Struct · 2005 · 5760 · 349
19. Sun DG · J Vib Shock · 2013 · 32 · 93
20. Han BH · Acta Energi Sin · 2014 · 35 · 1196
21. 10.1177/00219983980320210210.1177/002199839803202102 ↗
22. Wang H · Acta Mater Compos Sin · 2014 · 31 · 187
23. Liang S · J Vib Shock · 2013 · 32 · 51
24. Li NL · J Vib Shock · 2015 · 34 · 171
25. Li NL · J Vib Shock · 2015 · 34 · 82
26. 10.2174/221279760866615061917454710.2174/2212797608666150619174547 ↗
27. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
28. Yang MY · 2003
29. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.02310.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.023 ↗
30. Ma ZY · 2011
31. Malcolm DJ · 2006
32. Ye ZQ · Acta Energi Sin · 2001 · 22 · 473
33. 10.1155/2014/68478610.1155/2014/684786 ↗
34. Sun WG · 2008
35. Xue D · 2015