Investigation of progressive failure in the composite sandwich panels with elastomeric foam core under concentrated loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Failure and damage of crushable materials employed as core for the sandwich structures reduces serviceability and energy absorption capacity of the components especially under bending load so that many beneficial properties seem to be achieved by application of noncrushable lightweight materials instead of crushable foams as core for the sandwich structures. In this paper, an elastomeric foam is employed as core for two aspect ratios of the composite sandwich panels and the enhancement of the load-carrying capacity in the elastomeric foam-cored sandwich panels is investigated in comparison to which is measured about the individual composite panels applied as skins. Both experimental and finite element simulation programs are included in the research. The load-carrying performance of the elastomeric foam-cored sandwich panels is considered dependent on two main features of the constituent materials as hyperelastic behavior of the foam core and progressive damage of the composite skins which are simulated in the finite element models in order to describe the failure mechanism in the panels. Collapse of the elastomeric foam-cored sandwich panels is considered due to connection of some failure lines in the composite skins; however, the foam core remains undamaged. The elastomeric foam core can transfer the load from the top composite skin to the bottom one so that a great energy absorption capacity is provided for these panels. The elastomeric foam after failure of the composite skins can mobilize the residual strength of the laminates to endure against large deformations prior to final collapse. By application of the composite laminates in sandwich form with elastomeric foam core, the maximum load carrying and energy absorption capacity of the composite laminates increased about 60 and 110%, respectively. The results show more favorite failure behavior for the elastomeric foam-cored sandwich panels in comparison to which is expected usually for the crushable foam-cored sandwich panels which may be concerned in many industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-1-4020-3225-710.1007/978-1-4020-3225-7 ↗
3. Nazari AR · J Sandw Struct Mater
4. Liu CH · Z Angew Math Mech · 1996 · 76 · 305
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.00410.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.004 ↗
8. Nazari AR · J Sandw Struct Mater
9. 10.1177/109963620809744010.1177/1099636208097440 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.028 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40819-015-0035-910.1007/s40819-015-0035-9 ↗
12. Sahoo SS · J Eng Mech
13. Sahoo SS · Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.01610.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
16. Nazari AR. Investigation of load carrying and progressive failure in the composite sandwich panels with elastomeric foam core under biaxial bending . PhD Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, 2016. (in Persian).
17. ABAQUS Inc. ABAQUS/Analysis user’s manual. Version 6.10, 2010.
18. 10.1098/rsta.1948.002410.1098/rsta.1948.0024 ↗
19. 10.5254/1.353820610.5254/1.3538206 ↗
20. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90015-310.1016/0022-5096(65)90015-3 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
22. Camanho PP and Davila CG. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737, 2002.
23. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.005 ↗
24. Bažant ZP. · Mater Struct · 1983 · 16 · 155
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.069 ↗
26. Maimi P, Camanho PP, Mayugo J, et al. A thermodynamically consistent damage model for advanced composites. NASA/TM-2006-214282, 2006.
27. 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-310.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
28. Krueger R. The virtual crack closure technique: history, approach and applications. NASA/CR-2002-2211628, ICASE Report No. 2002-10, 2002.
29. 10.21236/AD061357610.21236/AD0613576 ↗
30. ASTM. Standard test methods for rubber property-compression set, ASTM: D395–03, 2003.
31. 10.1017/CBO978051175544610.1017/CBO9780511755446 ↗
32. ASTM. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM: D5528–94a, 1994.