journal article·2024-11

Numerical study on structured sandwich panels exposed to spherical air explosions

Solomon Abebe Derseh, Tesfaye Alemu Mohammed, Girum Urgessa

Publisher page

Abstract

There is a need to develop innovative protective shield structures to withstand extreme loads, such as impact and blast loading. Sandwich structures that absorb significant kinetic energy as strain energy through plastic deformation offer superior protection. This study conducts a numerical analysis of structured sandwich protective structures subjected to airblast loads using finite element modeling. First, an experimental result from the literature was used to validate and verify finite element models of an architected sandwich structure modeled in Abaqus/Explicit software. Second, parametric studies were conducted on sandwich structures with additional layers of insert plates and newly proposed core topologies for viable shield protection against airblast loading. The finite element analysis results indicated that, under the same impulsive load, the control sandwich panel exhibited higher kinetic energy, demanding a proportionally larger internal energy. Conversely, sandwich structures with additional inner core insert plates dissipated the imposed kinetic energy more efficiently, due to the inelastic plastic deformation of the proposed core configurations. Moreover, the energy absorption capacity and back sheet displacement time-history were significantly improved by dense-hierarchical inner core configurations. Additionally, the parametric study analysis showed that increasing the number of insert plates and designing the core topology of cellular walls to be redundant, dense-hierarchical, and braced against buckling significantly reduced core collapse mechanisms such as folding, buckling, and crushing. However, despite these benefits, a reversed effect on the areal specific energy absorption index was observed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Department of Civil Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Construction Quality and Technology Center of Excellence, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Department Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhu F. Impulsive loading of sandwich panels with cellular cores: PhD dissertation. Melbourne, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, 2008.
2. Nayak SK. Design optimization of honeycomb sandwich panels for blast load mitigation: PhD dissertation. Pennsylvania, USA: The Pennsylvania State University, 2012.10.1007/s00158-012-0845-x ↗
3. 10.1533/9781845698034.1.8810.1533/9781845698034.1.88 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1416473110.3390/ma14164731 ↗
5. 10.2495/SUSI20008110.2495/SUSI200081 ↗
6. Gigi C · Int Res J Eng Tech · 2022 · 9 · 522
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000239710.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002397 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008 ↗
9. 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-05-01410.28991/CEJ-2022-08-05-014 ↗
10. Soleimani SM · Int J Civ Environ Eng · 2016 · 10 · 1012
11. Farhadi K · J Mater Environ Sci · 2015 · 6 · 2013
12. 10.3390/jmse803018210.3390/jmse8030182 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
14. 10.1155/2020/535614510.1155/2020/5356145 ↗
15. Chi Y-C · 2008
16. George M, Jose S. Analytical study of metallic sandwich panel under blast load. Jabalpur: International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 2021, pp. 2320–2882.
17. Stanczak M · 2019 · 1
18. Thomas T, Tiwari G. Performance evaluation of reinforced honeycomb structures under blast load. Journal of Engg. Research Online First Article: 1–26.
19. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.02910.1016/j.tws.2019.04.029 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.011 ↗
21. Difs J · 2017
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.015 ↗
23. Gopichand A, Krishnaiah G, Krishna BM, et al. Design and analysis of corrugated steel sandwich structures using Ansys Workbench. Gandhinagar: International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 2012, pp. 1–5.
24. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.11.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.11.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.07310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.073 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.06.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.06.005 ↗
27. St-Pierre L, Fleck NA, Deshpande VS. The dynamic indentation response of sandwich panels with a corrugated or Y-frame core. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2015, 92, pp. 279–289.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.11.021 ↗
28. 10.2514/1.2677910.2514/1.26779 ↗
29. 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.204910.2140/jomms.2007.2.2049 ↗
30. 10.1007/s42452-023-05476-810.1007/s42452-023-05476-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11132910.1016/j.tws.2023.111329 ↗
32. Abaqus · 2013