journal article·2023-01

Design analysis and testing of flat sandwich panels under bird strike

Radoslaw Konik, Christos Kassapoglou, Dean Nguyen

Publisher page

Abstract

A non-linear energy-based analytical approach to design flat sandwich panels resistant to bird strike is presented. The approach is then complemented by numerical simulation in Abaqus using smooth particle hydrodynamics to model the bird and a non-linear stress-strain model for the core material. Flat sandwich panels were designed to deform and just fail when the maximum deflections are reached for given strike energies. The panels designed with this approach were tested using gelatin birds and two different material combinations with non-toughened and toughened facesheet and core materials. The analytical and numerical approaches were found to be conservative as they predicted failure onset for the bird energies selected while the tests showed no damage. The maximum deflection and maximum strains at different locations of the panels were well predicted by the numerical analysis, but the predictions departed significantly from the tests after the first peak was reached.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PZL Mielec, A Lockheed Martin Company, Mielec, Poland

Lockheed Martin International, Amsterdam, Netherland

Sikorsky Aircraft, A Lockheed Martin Company, Stratford, CT, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Gary PM, Riskalla MJ. Development of probabilistic design methodology for composite structures”, Office of Aviation Research, Washington DC; 1995. Report DOT/FAA/AR-95/17.
2. Metz IC · Aerospace · 2020 · 7 · 2610.3390/aerospace7030026 ↗
3. Challita A · 1979
4. Dobyns A. Bird strike analysis of S-92 vertical tail cover using DYTRAN. In: AHS Affordable Composite Structures Conference. USA, 1998.
5. Iannucci L · 1998
6. Dobyns A · 2001
7. Anghileri M · Structures Under Shock and Impact VIII · 2004 · 8 · 11
8. McCarthy MA · Appl Compos Mater · 2004 · 11 · 31710.1023/B:ACMA.0000037134.93410.c0 ↗
9. Heimbs S. Bird strike simulations on composite aircraft structures”. In: SIMULIA Customer Conference, Singapore, 2011.
10. Hedayati R · J Aircraft · 2011 · 48 · 208010.2514/1.C031451 ↗
11. Ericsson M · 2012
12. Mav RK · 2013
13. Liu J · Int J Impact Eng · 2014 · 70 · 2110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.03.006 ↗
14. Vijayakumar R · 2015
15. Di Caprio F · Appl Sci · 2020 · 10
16. Zhou Y · Materials · 2020 · 13
17. Arachchige B · Adv Eng Softw · 2020 · 148 · 10283910.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102839 ↗
18. Perdikoulis PV, Theotokoglou EE, Giannopoulos IK. Bird strike virtual testing simulations and results for preliminary airframe design structural optimization”, 14th WCCM ECCOMAS Congress 2020. January 2021, Virtual Congress Jan 2021.10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.076 ↗
19. Hanssen AG · Int J Impact Eng · 2006 · 32 · 112710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.004 ↗
20. Guida M, Grimaldi A, Marulo F, et al. Bird impact on leading edge wing with SPH formulation. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, UK, 2009.
21. Guida M · Compos Struct · 2011 · 93 · 106010.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.001 ↗
22. Federal aviation administration advisory circular AC20-107B, 2009, section 8, US Dept of Transportation, 2009.
23. Federal Aviation Regulations · 2011