journal article·2022-01

Anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive modeling of in-plane finite deformation responses of commercial composite hexagonal honeycombs

H Shahverdi Moghaddam, SR Keshavanarayana, C Yang, AL Horner

Publisher page

Abstract

This research presents the adaptation of an anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model for predicting the experimentally observed in-plane, orthotropic, bi-modular and nonlinear-elastic responses of a commercial adhesively bonded HRP-C fiberglass/phenolic hexagonal honeycomb core. The hyperelastic constitutive model is evaluated under simple states of loading using single-element finite element analysis. The predictions of the model, including stress-strain behavior, Poisson effects, and strain energy densities, are compared with test data for the in-plane uniaxial tension/compression responses of the honeycomb core as well as the single-element model with a linear orthotropic constitutive model to highlight the effectiveness of the hyperelastic model at high strain levels. Good agreement is observed between the model predictions and test data. Tension tests in ribbon and transverse directions with the full-scale honeycomb core are also simulated to ensure the suitability of the single element model for simulations of the simple loading cases and preliminary validation process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Polymer composites and self-healing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA

Spirit AeroSystems, Wichita, KS, USA

Funding

Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., Wichita, KS

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Bitzer T. · 2012
2. Hexcel.com. HexWeb honeycomb attributes and properties. Stamford, CT: Hexcel Corporation.
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.07.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2007.07.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-610.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-6 ↗
5. Gibson LJ · 1999
6. 10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.12.006 ↗
8. 10.4236/ojcm.2013.3400910.4236/ojcm.2013.34009 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.007 ↗
10. Soliman HE, Kapania RK. Assessment of existing models for honeycomb homogenized properties. In: 2nd AIAA spacecraft structures conference. Reston: AIAA, 2015, pp.2290–2300.10.2514/6.2015-1162 ↗
11. 10.1115/DETC2009-8773010.1115/DETC2009-87730 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.02910.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.029 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.404327110.1115/1.4043271 ↗
14. 10.1115/DETC2016-5908210.1115/DETC2016-59082 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10545110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105451 ↗
16. Schultz J · J Mech Des · 2012
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.010 ↗
19. Janus-Michalska M. · Czasopismo Techniczne · 2018 · 2018 · 61
20. Shahverdi H, Keshavanarayana SR, Kothare A. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of fiberglass/phenolic honeycomb core under uniaxial in-plane loading. In: Proceedings of the 2017 SAMPE conference, Seattle, WA, May 22-25 2017.
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10582410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105824 ↗
22. 10.1177/2633366X2091015710.1177/2633366X20910157 ↗
23. Shahverdi H, Keshavanarayana S, Yang C, et al. A numerical and experimental approach to characterize the failure modes of hexagonal cell honeycomb core under in-plane loading. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Composites thirty-second technical conference, West Lafayette, Indiana, October 23-25, 2017; 2290–2300.
24. 10.12783/asc33/2611210.12783/asc33/26112 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90085-X10.1016/0022-5096(94)90085-X ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00027-610.1016/S0022-5096(97)00027-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00324-210.1016/S0020-7683(98)00324-2 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.403296410.1115/1.4032964 ↗
29. 10.2514/1.3953110.2514/1.39531 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11174910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111749 ↗
31. Timoshenko SP · 1961
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.009 ↗
33. Shahverdi H, Yang C, Keshavanarayana S, et al. Analysis of In-plane mechanical response of hexagonal honeycomb core: effect of node bond adhesive and proposed analytical method. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Composites thirty-second technical conference , West Lafayette, Indiana, October 23-25, 2017
34. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.11.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2005.11.009 ↗
35. Janus-Michalska M. · Arch Mech · 2011 · 63 · 3
36. 10.1137/16M109889910.1137/16M1098899 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.400264010.1115/1.4002640 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.00210.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.002 ↗
39. MSC Marc Volume A, Theory and user information , 2017, MSC Software Corporation, 5161 California Ave. Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92617
40. 10.12783/asc34/3139410.12783/asc34/31394 ↗
41. 10.1007/978-3-319-23273-710.1007/978-3-319-23273-7 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.027 ↗
43. Itskov M. · 2007
44. 10.1002/zamm.1979059040310.1002/zamm.19790590403 ↗
45. 10.1023/A:102084352953010.1023/A:1020843529530 ↗
46. Tanaka M · Comput Model Eng Sci · 2010 · 62 · 265
47. 10.1007/978-3-7091-0174-2_410.1007/978-3-7091-0174-2_4 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10237-005-0006-x10.1007/s10237-005-0006-x ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-007-1812-610.1007/s10853-007-1812-6 ↗
50. 10.1038/nprot.2009.18210.1038/nprot.2009.182 ↗
51. MSC Marc Volume D. User subroutines and special routines, 2017, MSC Software Corporation, 5161 California Ave. Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92617
52. MSC Marc Volume B. Element Library, 2017, MSC Software Corporation, 5161 California Ave. Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92617