Damage initiation and fracture analysis of honeycomb core single cantilever beam sandwich specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
Fracture testing and analysis of aerospace grade honeycomb core sandwich constructions using a single cantilever beam test methodology is presented here. Influence of various parameters such as facesheet thickness, core density, honeycomb cell-size, and core thickness were studied. A Winkler-based foundation model was used to calculate compliance and energy-release rate, and further compare with finite element model and experiments. A cohesive zone model was developed to predict the disbond initiation and simulate the interface crack propagation in the single cantilever beam sandwich specimen. The mode I interface fracture toughness obtained from the translating base single cantilever beam setup was provided as input in this cohesive zone model. It is shown that the presented cohesive zone approach is robust, and is able to capture the debonding phenomenon for majority of the honeycomb core specimens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR), Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA
Funding
Federal Aviation Administration
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.028 ↗
2. Loss of Rudder in Flight. Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB), 2007.
3. Air Accident Investigation Branch. AAIB Bulletin 2/95 Ref: EW/C94/8/ 3. UK, 1995.
4. Air Accident Investigation Branch. AAIB Bulletin 10/96 Ref: EW/C96/6/6 . UK, 1996.
5. ASTM International · 2012
6. 10.1177/002199830707997410.1177/0021998307079974 ↗
7. Fields RE, Zarda RP. Analysis and test methodology for fracture mechanics of unbonded sandwich structures. Martin Maerietta Task Report, EDF No MM0 TKR 10722739-001, 1994.
8. 10.1007/BF0027816210.1007/BF00278162 ↗
9. Ratcliffe J, Krueger R. Face sheet/core disbonding in sandwich composite components: a road map to standardization: test method development. In: 11th international conference on sandwich structures. Dania Beach, FL, USA, 20–22 May 2016.
10. Tomblin JS, Seneviratne W, Denning S. Mode I (G1c) fracture toughness of composite sandwich structures for use in damage tolerance design and analysis: Vol. I Static testing including effects of fluid ingression. New Jersey, DOT/FAA/TC-16/23, 2017.
11. Tomblin JS, Seneviratne W, Denning S. Fatigue damage growth rate of sandwich structures . New Jersey, DOT/FAA/TC-17/6, 2018.
12. Tomblin JS, Seneviratne W, Denning S. Damage growth in sandwich structures: supplement to volume I testing. New Jersey, DOT/FAA/TC-17/7, 2018.
13. 10.1177/002199831140111610.1177/0021998311401116 ↗
14. 10.1177/109963621878822310.1177/1099636218788223 ↗
15. MTS Systems Corporation. MTS TestWorks™ software . Eden Prairie, MN: MTS Systems Corp. 2012.
16. Clarkson E. Cytec Cycom 5320-1 T650 3k-PW fabric material allowables statistical analysis report, NCP-RP-2012-023 Rev NC. National Institure for Aviation Research (NIAR), Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 2015.
17. Gibson LJ and · 1999
18. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.008 ↗
19. Hexcel®. HexWeb® HRH-10 aramid fibre/phenolic honeycomb - product data sheet.
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
23. 10.1002/nme.511710.1002/nme.5117 ↗
24. 10.1177/109963620200400102910.1177/1099636202004001029 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.02210.1016/j.jcp.2019.02.022 ↗
26. Saseendran V · J Sandw Struct Mater · 2018
27. Rinker M, Ratcliffe JG, Adams DO, et al. Characterizing facesheet/core disbonding in honeycomb core sandwich structure. NASA Tech Rep CR-2013-217959, 2013.
28. Barber JR. · 2010
29. 10.1177/002199830606528510.1177/0021998306065285 ↗
30. 10.1177/002199831774971410.1177/0021998317749714 ↗
31. 10.1177/00219980177266139910.1177/002199801772661399 ↗
32. 10.1177/10996362000020010110.1177/109963620000200101 ↗
33. 10.1201/978142005821510.1201/9781420058215 ↗