Finite-element analysis of the fundamental frequency of a sandwich plate with pyramidal lattice truss core: Comparison of the discrete and continuous core models
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis of discrete and continuous models for the pyramidal lattice truss core in sandwich plates. The study focuses on determining the fundamental vibration frequency as the basis for model comparison. The finite element method, implemented in ANSYS, was employed to address the dynamic problem. The sandwich plate with a pyramidal lattice truss core was modeled using shell and beam finite elements, while the continuous core plate was represented with shell and solid volume finite elements. The effects of the number of pyramidal cells, core thickness, and lattice truss core strut diameter on the fundamental frequency were examined. Fundamental frequencies obtained from both core models were compared, revealing that the continuous core model consistently overestimates the fundamental frequency. Additionally, a design algorithm for sandwich plates with a pyramidal lattice truss core was developed. The procedures for finite element model generation, fundamental frequency calculation, and structural design were implemented using APDL.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Computational Mechanics and Risk Analysis, Federal Research Center for Information and Computational Technologies
Department of Computer Modelling, Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Department of Complex Analysis, Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10130110.1016/j.addma.2020.101301 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11512010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115120 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.12335210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123352 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e0026710.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00267 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.12145010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121450 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11665-023-08423-110.1007/s11665-023-08423-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11826710.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118267 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.10102110.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.06010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.060 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.04210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.042 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.12.00610.1016/j.jmps.2018.12.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.12.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2018.12.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11170610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111706 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10061510.1016/j.coco.2020.100615 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11589310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115893 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.11808910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118089 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11218510.1016/j.tws.2024.112185 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11812210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118122 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11249810.1016/j.tws.2024.112498 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.11494010.1016/j.chaos.2024.114940 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11168610.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111686 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10540110.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105401 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11764210.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117642 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11265510.1016/j.tws.2024.112655 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.11310710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.113107 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11435810.1016/j.tws.2025.114358 ↗
28. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Harley BA. Cellular materials in nature and medicine. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
29. HEXCEL. Honeycomb sandwich design technology, 1998. Technical report.
30. Ansys. Url: https://www.ansys.com
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.07710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.077 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.023 ↗