journal article·2020-10Open access

Generally cylindrical orthotropic constitutive modeling of matrix-filled carbon nanotubes: Transverse mechanical properties and responses

Davood Askari, Mehrdad N. Ghasemi-Nejhad

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to introduce exact analytical closed-form solutions for the prediction of effective transverse Young’s modulus and Poisson ratio of a matrix-filled nanotube (i.e., a representative element of nanotube-based nanocomposites), as well as its mechanical behavior, when subjected to external loads. In this work, both the nanotube and its filler were considered to be generally cylindrical orthotropic. To ensure no loss of generality, the no plane strain condition was used, and the axial strain was taken into consideration to obtain a more precise set of solutions. Analytical formulae were developed based on the well-established principles of linear elasticity and continuum mechanics, considering effective orthotropic properties for both constituents as continuum tubes. To validate and verify the accuracy of the closed-form solutions obtained from the analytical approach, a three-dimensional finite element analysis was performed, and results were compared to those obtained from the analytical exact solutions. Excellent agreement was achieved, and the analytically obtained solutions were verified.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Multifunctional Nanocomposites Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, USA

Hawaii Nanotechnology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.106092810.1126/science.1060928 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat165010.1038/nmat1650 ↗
3. 10.1038/381678a010.1038/381678a0 ↗
4. 10.1166/jnn.2006.34810.1166/jnn.2006.348 ↗
5. 10.1166/jnn.2006.34910.1166/jnn.2006.349 ↗
6. 10.1166/nano.2014.100910.1166/nano.2014.1009 ↗
7. 10.1166/jctn.2011.175310.1166/jctn.2011.1753 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1401310.1103/PhysRevB.58.14013 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.287.5453.63710.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.17550210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.175502 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.363410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3634 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.07340110.1103/PhysRevB.69.073401 ↗
13. 10.1088/0965-0393/15/8/00110.1088/0965-0393/15/8/001 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2011.42010.1557/jmr.2011.420 ↗
15. 10.1088/1468-6996/13/4/04500210.1088/1468-6996/13/4/045002 ↗
16. 10.1038/361333a010.1038/361333a0 ↗
17. 10.1038/362522a010.1038/362522a0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.02910.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.029 ↗
19. 10.1021/cm960246w10.1021/cm960246w ↗
20. 10.1021/jp075684c10.1021/jp075684c ↗
21. 10.1115/1.362959010.1115/1.3629590 ↗
22. 10.2514/3.373210.2514/3.3732 ↗
23. Christensen RM. · 1979
24. 10.1115/1.32115010.1115/1.321150 ↗
25. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90017-510.1016/0266-3538(94)90017-5 ↗
26. 10.1177/089270571247362110.1177/0892705712473621 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00200-410.1016/S0167-6636(02)00200-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00090-910.1016/S0927-0256(03)00090-9 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199830606701810.1177/0021998306067018 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.12.02610.1016/j.commatsci.2015.12.026 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.020 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.052 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.006 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.029 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.051 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.029 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.024 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.033 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00894-015-2889-510.1007/s00894-015-2889-5 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.009 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.024 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.spmi.2013.10.04610.1016/j.spmi.2013.10.046 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.04810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.048 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.00510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.06.005 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.06.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2009.06.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.023 ↗
49. 10.1007/BF0225468610.1007/BF02254686 ↗
50. 10.1007/BF0225468710.1007/BF02254687 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.02.01610.1016/j.tws.2017.02.016 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.03210.1016/j.ast.2017.05.032 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.009 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.06410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.064 ↗
55. 10.1080/01495739.2017.133892810.1080/01495739.2017.1338928 ↗
56. Van Thu P · Sci Eng Compos Mater · 2016 · 24 · 951
57. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.09.03110.1016/j.ast.2017.09.031 ↗
58. Timoshenko S · 1951
59. 10.1007/0-306-48414-510.1007/0-306-48414-5 ↗
60. Tsai SW · 1980
61. Halpin JC, Tsai SW. Air Force Material Laboratory Technical Report – AFML-TR, pp.67–423, 1967.
62. ANSYS, Inc. · 2009
63. 10.1166/jctn.2005.11510.1166/jctn.2005.115 ↗
64. Maplesoft · 2006
65. O’Neil PV. · 1993
66. Pilkey WD · 1994
67. Kalamkarov A · J Comput Theor Nanosci · 2005 · 2 · 124