Experimental and numerical study of auxetic sandwich panels on 160 grams of PE4 blast loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Mines, specifically as Anti-Tank (AT) mines are a significant threat for defence vehicles. While approaches such as v-shaped hulls are currently used to deflect the blast products from such threats, such a solution is not always usable when hull standoff is limited. As such the development of a low profile, energy absorbing solution is desirable. One approach that has potential to achieve these requirements are sandwich panels. While sandwich panel cores can be constructed from various materials, one material of particular interest are auxetics. Auxetic are materials that exhibit a negative Poisson’s ratio. This material has potential to be an efficient an impact energy absorber by increasing stiffness at local deformation by gathering mass at the impact location. This study investigates the effectiveness of novel auxetic core infills alongside three other panel types (monolithic, air gap, polymer foam sandwich) against buried charges. 160 grams of PE4 were buried in 100 mm depth and 500 mm stand off the target. Laser and High Speed Video (HSV) system were used to capture the deflection-time profile and load cell sensors were used to record the loading profile received by the panels. Experimental works were compared with numerical model. Explicit model were generated in LSDYNA software as ‘initial impulse mine’ keyword. The result found that the auxetic and foam core panels were effective in reducing peak structural loading and impulse by up to 33% and 34% respectively. Air-filled panels were the most effective to reduce the deflection of the rear of the plate, however variation between capture methods (HSV and Laser system) were reported, while numerical modelling provided comparable plate deflections responses. When normalised against panel weight, the air filled panels were experimentally the most efficient per unit mass system with the auxetics being the least effective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Survivability Lethality and Advanced Materials Group, Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, UK
Lightweight Structures Research Group, Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
RAL Space, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. Bird R. · J Battlef Technol · 2001 · 4 · 14
2. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). STANAG 4659: protection levels for occupant of armoured vehicles . Washington: NATO, 2012.
3. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). AEP-55: procedures for evaluating the protection level of armoured vehicles – mine threat . Washington: NATO, 2011.
4. Mann CT, Fischer H. Recent trends in active-duty military deaths non-OCO deaths , https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IF10899.pdf (accessed 30 October 2018).
5. Schneck W. The development of mine resistant vehicles . Virginia, USA: TARDEC, 1994.
6. Hazell PJ. · 2016
7. Yap CHK. The impact of armor on the design, utilization and survivability of ground vehicles: the history of armor development and use. Naval Postgrade School, Monterey California, 2012.
8. 10.1002/pssb.20098203110.1002/pssb.200982031 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6NR07911C10.1039/C6NR07911C ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.009 ↗
11. 10.1002/pssb.20108397510.1002/pssb.201083975 ↗
12. Choi JB · J Mater Sci · 1992 · 27
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.008 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssb.20138422910.1002/pssb.201384229 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.04710.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.047 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.280680710.1115/1.2806807 ↗
18. Duc ND · J Sandw Struct Mater · 2016 · 20 · 692
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.009 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssb.20124855010.1002/pssb.201248550 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100483010341110.1023/A:1004830103411 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.01.01010.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.01.010 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.066 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep3298910.1038/srep32989 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms1522410.1038/ncomms15224 ↗
26. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05401510.1088/0964-1726/25/5/054015 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.05710.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.057 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.02410.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.024 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.012 ↗
30. 10.1002/pssb.20155276810.1002/pssb.201552768 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssb.20160007910.1002/pssb.201600079 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-019-12757-710.1038/s41467-019-12757-7 ↗
33. 10.1038/ncomms572710.1038/ncomms5727 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10367210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103672 ↗
35. Underhill RS. · DSIAC J · 2014 · 1 · 7
36. Sun Y · J Ind Text · 2019 · 104 · 1
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.050 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
40. 10.1177/109963621561853910.1177/1099636215618539 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.038 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.027 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.037 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.03010.1016/j.tws.2017.03.030 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.03010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.030 ↗
46. Pardal G, Meco S, Dunn A, et al. Laser spot welding of laser textured steel to aluminium. J Mater Process Technol 2017; 241: 24–35.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.025 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.04810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.048 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.05010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.050 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.05.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.05.007 ↗
50. Schwer L, Teng H and Souli M. LS-DYNA air blast techniques: Comparisons with experiments for close-in charges. In: 10th European LS-DYNA Conference 2015 . Würzburg, Germany. June 15–17, 2015.
51. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.01.004 ↗
52. Fleck NA and Deshpande VS. The resistance of Clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. J Appl Mech 71: 386–401.10.1115/1.1629109 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.10.01210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.10.012 ↗
54. Tremblay JE · 1998
55. Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA theory manual . Livermore, California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation. March, 2006.
56. Schwer L and Slavik T. Buried charge engineering model: Verification and validation. In: 9th European LS-DYNA Conference 2013 . Manchester, United Kingdom: DYNAore GmbH, p. 23.
57. LSTC. LS-DYNA: keywors user’s manual I . Livermore: LSTC.
58. Bogosian D, Yokota M and Rigby S. TNT equivalence of C-4 and PE4: A review of traditional sources and recent data. In: 24th International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS 24) . Halifax, Canada: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. September 19-23, 2016. pp. 1–15.
59. Westin PS, Morris BL, Cox PA, et al. Development of computer program for floor plate response from land mine explosions. Technical Report No. 13045. US Army Tank-Automotive Command, Warren, MI, January, 1985.
60. Williams K, Mcclennan S, Durocher R, et al. Validation of a loading model for simulating blast mine effects on armoured vehicles. In: 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference , Detroit Michigan, USA. May 2002. pp. 35–44.
61. DoD. Structures to resist the effects of the accidental explosions. Washington D.C., USA. December 5, 2008.
62. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000049310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000493 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.07.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2003.07.003 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.002 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.006 ↗
66. Jones N. Strain rate behaviour of materials. In: Structural impact. Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 348–352.
67. Cowper GR, Symonds PS. Strain rate hardening and strain rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Armed Services Technical Information Agency, Office of Naval Research. Dayton, Ohio, 1957. pp. 40–45.10.21236/AD0144762 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.04.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.04.002 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.02410.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024 ↗
70. Overview of materials for low carbon steel. Material property data – matweb, www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=034970339dd14349a8297d2c83134649 (accessed 24 October 2019).
71. Wickes DIY. Home improvement products for trade and DIY, www.wickes.co.uk/ (accessed 24 October 2019).
72. Panel Systems. Craftfoam blue for model making, product design & prototypes, www.panelsystems.co.uk/product/craftfoam-blue (accessed 7 January 2018).
73. AMETEK Material Analysis Division. Phantom Camera Control Help File. Vision Research. 2015.
74. 10.1136/jramc-155-04-0610.1136/jramc-155-04-06 ↗
75. Bergeron DM and Tremblay JE. Canadian research to characterise mine blast output. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on the Military Aspects of Blast and Shock . Oxford, United Kingdom, 2000, pp. 501–511.
76. 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.05.00110.1016/j.jmps.2009.05.001 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.00410.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.004 ↗
78. Rigby S, Fay SD, Tyas A, et al. Localised variations in reflected pressure from explosives buried in uniform and well-graded soils. In: 24th International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS 24) . Halifax, Canada: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. September 19-23, 2016. pp. 1–11.
79. Hlady SL, Bergeron D and Gonzalez R. Protecting vehicles from landmine blasts. In: 22nd International Symposium on Ballistics . Vancouver, Canada, 2005, pp. 1239–1246.
80. Task Group TG-024. Test Methodologies for Personal Protective Equipment Against Anti-Personnel Mine Blast. Virginia, USA. March, 2004.
81. Bergeron D, Walker R, Coffey C. Detonation of 100-gram anti-personnel mine surrogate charges in sand: a test case for computer code validation. Suffield Report No. 668, DRES-SR-668, 1998.
82. Absil LHJ, Verbeek HJ, Weerheijm J. Combined experimental and numerical study of mine detonations in the vicinity of vehicles. In: 15th International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock . Banff, Alberta, Canada, September 14–19, 1997.
83. Gupta AD. Estimation of vehicle floor plate loading and response due to detonation of a mine shallow-buried in dry sand and wet tuff. In: US Army ground vehicle survivability symposium , Monterey, California USA. April 29–May 1, 1999.
84. Braid MP. Experimental investigation and analysis of the effects of anti-personnel landmine blast effects, Suffield Report SSP 2001-188, 2001.
85. Hlady S. Effect of soil parameters on land mine blast. In: 18th Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) . Bad Reichenhall, Germany, pp. 1–16.
86. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.00610.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.006 ↗