Wooden sandwich panels with auxetic core for furniture - experimental and numerical analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Honeycomb panels manufactured from wood and paper materials promote a high-value utilization of wood resources. However, the poor mechanical properties and uncommon thicknesses (32 and 40 mm) of paper honeycomb panels limit their application and promotion in the panel furniture industry. Hence, numerous attempts have been made to develop high-strength and low-density wood sandwich composites for the frames and partitions of cabinet furniture. This paper describes a method for manufacturing lightweight sandwich panels (18 mm thickness) with auxetic cores, made of fast-growing poplar. The mechanical properties of the panels and the negative Poisson's ratio of the perforated sheet cores were determined by three-point bending and uniaxial compression tests. The lower density, higher modulus of elasticity, and bending strength suggest that the developed panel is a good substitute for traditional wood-based panels. A numerical model for panels in bending tests is proposed and validated against the experimental analysis results. These investigations facilitate further research into optimizing the sandwich panel structure and its applicability in the architectural and furniture industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Furniture and Art Design, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China
Funding
The Hunan Province Key R&D · The Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Leaders · The Young and middle-aged scholars training program · The Hebei Province Scientific Research Project for the Introduction of National High-level Innovative Talents
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s42114-020-00163-310.1007/s42114-020-00163-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.03910.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.039 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.11310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.113 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.01910.1016/j.tws.2019.01.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10815910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108159 ↗
6. 10.15376/biores.8.4.4873-488210.15376/biores.8.4.4873-4882 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.01710.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.009 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10683410.1016/j.tws.2020.106834 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-981-16-5237-0_1610.1007/978-981-16-5237-0_16 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
12. 10.1038/353124a010.1038/353124a0 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0240384610.1007/BF02403846 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0003648110.1007/BF00036481 ↗
15. 10.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S10.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11558610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115586 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20220879210.1002/adfm.202208792 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.10490510.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104905 ↗
19. 10.1002/cey2.35310.1002/cey2.353 ↗
20. 10.7494/mech.2012.31.2.7210.7494/mech.2012.31.2.72 ↗
21. Smardzewski J · Wood is Good – Eu Preaccession Chalenges of the Sector · 2011 · 22 · 173
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.07510.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.075 ↗
23. 10.1002/pssb.20098203110.1002/pssb.200982031 ↗
24. 10.1515/hf-2012-005510.1515/hf-2012-0055 ↗
25. 10.15376/biores.13.4.8823-883810.15376/biores.13.4.8823-8838 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1318421210.3390/ma13184212 ↗
27. 10.1002/adem.20100000510.1002/adem.201000005 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20150365310.1002/adma.201503653 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssb.20145174010.1002/pssb.201451740 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.01210.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.013 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1319425210.3390/ma13194252 ↗
33. 10.15376/biores.14.2.2977-299410.15376/biores.14.2.2977-2994 ↗
34. GB/T 1927.11-2022 · Standardization Administration of China Press · 2022
35. GB/T 1927.12-2021 · Standardization Administration of China Press · 2021
36. 10.1007/978-3-319-19533-910.1007/978-3-319-19533-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11153510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111535 ↗
38. 10.3390/plants1213245110.3390/plants12132451 ↗
39. Żmuda E · Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Forestry and Wood Technology · 2018 · 104 · 345
40. GB/T 17657-2022 · Standardization Administration of China Press · 2022
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.013 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.055 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
44. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
45. ASTM D5528-13. Standard test method for mode l interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. 2013.
46. 10.1023/A:100886981162610.1023/A:1008869811626 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.03010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.030 ↗
48. Dadej K · Composites Theory and Practice · 2016 · 16 · 180
49. 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00137-X10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00137-X ↗
50. 10.1126/science.64.1656.29810.1126/science.64.1656.298 ↗
51. Bal BC · Maderas Cienc Tecnol · 2014 · 16 · 99
52. 10.1515/hf-2014-011410.1515/hf-2014-0114 ↗