Scaling behaviour of corrugated sandwich panels under impact load
Source abstract
Abstract
The majority of the experimental studies investigating the dynamic response of sandwich panels are conducted using small-scale models that cannot be applied directly in the marine industry. In this study, a velocity–stress–mass (VSG) method based on the Johnson–Cook equation (VSG–JC) is derived to determine the relationship between a full-size structure (prototype) and its scaled-down model. The developed methodology is verified using theoretical and numerical solutions for an impact-loaded beam and plate, respectively. Theoretically, the model response can explicitly predict the behavior of a full-size structure using the VSG–JC method, whereas the strain rate cannot be obtained precisely via numerical simulation; hence, the corrected results for the model deviate slightly from the prototype results. Additionally, this method is compared with the VSG method based on the Cowper–Symonds equation (VSG–CS) in the numerical simulation of sandwich panels. The comparison results indicates that the VSG–JC method is more accurate than the VSG–CS method. The dynamic response of the scaled models predicted using the VSG–JC method coincides with that of the prototype, thus demonstrating that the VSG–JC method is valid for evaluating the scaling behavior of sandwich structures subjected to impact loads.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Cellular and Composite Structures · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lian Yungang, China
School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhen Jiang, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.07.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.07.007 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.01410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.014 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-319-13476-510.1007/978-3-319-13476-5 ↗
4. Sedov LI · 1961
5. 10.1017/CBO978051182062510.1017/CBO9780511820625 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00419-004-0343-810.1007/s00419-004-0343-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.05.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.05.014 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.00510.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.01810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.01110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10374410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103744 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00419-019-01635-910.1007/s00419-019-01635-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10409210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104092 ↗
15. 10.2514/2.171110.2514/2.1711 ↗
16. Mondal AS · 2016
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.011 ↗
18. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90262-310.1016/0263-8223(94)90262-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.11049210.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110492 ↗
20. Norman J · 1989
21. Liu K · 2016
22. Huang X, Hu W. Determination of Johnson-Cook constitutive parameters. In: Proceedings of The 6th National Conference on Experimental Technology of Explosive Mechanics, China, 2010, pp. 308–315. (in Chinese).
23. Zhu Y · 2019
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/0020-7683(88)90032-710.1016/0020-7683(88)90032-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00018-010.1016/S0734-743X(02)00018-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00017-910.1016/S0734-743X(02)00017-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2011.09.00610.1016/j.tws.2011.09.006 ↗
29. Jones N · J Press Vessel Technol · 2008 · 11 · 130
30. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.03.00610.1016/j.marstruc.2017.03.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.015 ↗