Design and verification of the square convex surface multilayer radar absorbing structure based on additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to addressing electromagnetic property variations in 3D printed structures using additive manufacturing (AM). Utilizing continuous fiber 3D printing, the focus is on designing and fabricating a square convex surface multilayer radar absorbing structure (RAS) tailored for obliquely incident electromagnetic (EM) waves. Variations in complex permittivity due to structural shape-influenced changes in nozzle paths in AM-fabricated 3D printed structures are observed. To counter this, a ‘Process Permittivity Correction Method’ is developed, enhancing design and fabrication accuracy. Before optimizing each structure of the RAS, the process permittivity, which varies according to the structural shape and the set nozzle paths, was applied in the design. The optimized RAS, considering both TE and TM modes at a 60° incident angle, showed a high correlation between the trends of interpreted and measured absorption performance. This approach effectively corrects electromagnetic property variations in 3D printed structures, ensuring consistency between design and manufacturing while maintaining EM properties and absorption performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Materials & Energy Technology Center, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Funding
NRF · The Ministry of Science and ICT · Aerospace Low Observable Technology Laboratory Program · The Agency for Defense Development of the Republic of Korea
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10237810.1016/j.addma.2021.102378 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11773210.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117732 ↗
6. 10.1177/1099636221103701510.1177/10996362211037015 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1518369510.3390/polym15183695 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.10720910.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107209 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11147610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1207152910.3390/polym12071529 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-009810.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11511210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115112 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
16. 10.1109/LAWP.2016.256090410.1109/LAWP.2016.2560904 ↗
17. 10.1109/LAWP.2020.298140510.1109/LAWP.2020.2981405 ↗
18. 10.23919/EuMC.2018.854169910.23919/EuMC.2018.8541699 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-018-23286-610.1038/s41598-018-23286-6 ↗
20. 10.3390/ma1107124910.3390/ma11071249 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10990010.1016/j.matdes.2021.109900 ↗
22. Lim DD · Addit Manuf · 2022 · 55 · 102856
23. 10.1109/74.89417810.1109/74.894178 ↗
24. Ohtani T, Kanai Y, Kantartzis NV. Partial RCS evaluation method for low-observable aircraft design using PEC and PMC boundaries. In: 2021 international applied computational electromagnetics society symposium (ACES), Hamilton, ON, 01–05 August 2021, pp. 1–3. IEEE.
25. 10.1177/073168441775047710.1177/0731684417750477 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11302210.1016/j.measurement.2023.113022 ↗
27. Fieber L · Addit Manuf · 2020 · 32 · 101010
28. 10.3390/designs304005010.3390/designs3040050 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10168610.1016/j.addma.2020.101686 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00273-810.1016/S0955-2219(98)00273-8 ↗
31. Yousefi J · 2011 · 10
32. 10.58286/2369410.58286/23694 ↗
33. 10.3390/technologies804005110.3390/technologies8040051 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10853-010-4557-610.1007/s10853-010-4557-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11427910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114279 ↗
36. 10.1039/C7NR01516J10.1039/C7NR01516J ↗
37. 10.1039/C9CP06196G10.1039/C9CP06196G ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10826910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108269 ↗
39. Mohammad SA · Mater Sci Appl · 2018 · 9 · 11
40. Chand R · J Mater Eng Perform · 2022
41. 10.1080/09243046.2023.228368110.1080/09243046.2023.2283681 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.03010.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00170-013-5196-210.1007/s00170-013-5196-2 ↗
44. 10.1109/19.6994210.1109/19.69942 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10740810.1016/j.measurement.2019.107408 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_510.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5 ↗
47. Markforged · 2021