Homogenized quadriaxial laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Homogenized laminates offer great advantages for design optimization, tapering, and simpler manufacturing. This can be achieved by stacking identical building blocks, so the laminate normalized in-plane stiffness components converge to the flexural stiffnesses. In this research, it was shown that the rate of convergence of quadriaxial laminates varies with layup. A family of three quadriaxial carbon fiber reinforced plastic CFRP laminates showing the fastest convergence was studied: one quasi-isotropic [+45/−45/0/90] and two hard [+45/−45/0 2 /90] and [+45/−45/0 3 /90]. The study showed that the ratios between the average strengths of different quadriaxial laminates will be the same for a given material. In addition, for a given quadriaxial laminate, the relative strengths between CFRP materials are the same. In summary, this investigation opens new opportunities for design and manufacturing that can be explored with homogenized quadriaxial laminates, providing a framework for engineers to select layups based on predictable convergence rates and strength relationships.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Stanford University
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Funding
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq · National Institute for Aviation Research – NIAR · Wichita State University · National Center for Advanced Materials Performance
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2514/1.J06065910.2514/1.J060659 ↗
2. 10.2514/1.J06263910.2514/1.J062639 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1719467710.3390/ma17194677 ↗
4. Kappel E. Double–double laminates for aerospace applications — finding best laminates for given load sets. Compos Part C 2022; 8: 100244.
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11251810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112518 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2805610.1002/pc.28056 ↗
7. 10.1177/0021998325136235810.1177/00219983251362358 ↗
8. 10.1177/2634983324123724410.1177/26349833241237244 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11324610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113246 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11311510.1016/j.compositesb.2025.113115 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10889710.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108897 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.017 ↗
13. Tsai SW, Melo JDD. Composite materials design and testing—unlocking mystery with invariants. Composites Design Group, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, 2015.
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2015.08.003 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168441562477010.1177/0731684415624770 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.055 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.011 ↗