journal article·2026-03

Investigating impact behavior of polymeric composite laminate bolted joints: A numerical and experimental approach

Majid Safarabadi, Hamed Ghavami, Mojtaba Haghighi Yazdi

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the effect of preload on bolted joints in composite plate connections under impact loading is investigated. Delamination, a common failure mode in composite structures, occurs around joints due to stress concentration. To prevent delamination, preload is applied to the bolted area. Experimental samples of composite plates connected by bolts were manufactured using the Vacuum Infusion method. These specimens were subjected to low velocity impacts with energies of 26 J and 35 J. The conducted experiment was then simulated using ABAQUS software. Due to material limitations, degradation behavior was programmed using VUMAT subroutine in Fortran software. The simulation results were compared with the experimental data, showing good agreement. The simulation revealed the delamination area around the hole in the composite plate. By applying different preload forces (1 MPa, 10 MPa, and 105 MPa) to the areas around the bolt, a significant reduction (46%) in the delamination area was observed. This highlights the effectiveness of applying preload force and clamping in improving joint strength and reducing delamination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Tehran

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.010 ↗
2. Mohammadi I, Haghighi-Yazdi M, Safarabadi M, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of a composite guardrail under impact loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L 2023; 237: 1651–1664.
3. Nikbakht A, Javadpour J, Naimi-Jamal MR, et al. Fabrication and evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene-based nanocomposites reinforced with hydroxyapatite, zirconia and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. bioRxiv 2021.
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.10410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.104 ↗
5. Nassar SA, Yang X. Fastening and joining of composite materials. In: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, 2013, vol 7.
6. 10.31399/asm.tb.scm.978162708314010.31399/asm.tb.scm.9781627083140 ↗
7. 10.1177/002199830505202710.1177/0021998305052027 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199830505202610.1177/0021998305052026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.010 ↗
11. Sen F, Sayman O, Ozcan R, et al. Failure response of single bolted composite joints under various preload. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 2010; 17: 1.
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.014 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
15. 10.1177/00219983870210090410.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.001 ↗
17. Yen CF. Ballistic impact modeling of composite materials. In: Proceedings of the 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2002, vol 6.
18. Manual KUS. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual Volume II R10.0. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2017, vol I.
19. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-010.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2023.10413210.1016/j.mechrescom.2023.104132 ↗
23. 10.1080/15397734.2021.192159610.1080/15397734.2021.1921596 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.037 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.029 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10443-023-10192-y10.1007/s10443-023-10192-y ↗
27. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00126-810.1016/S0266-3538(99)00126-8 ↗
28. 10.1177/00219983880220120510.1177/002199838802201205 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.013 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168441561257310.1177/0731684415612573 ↗
31. 10.1177/030932471039699710.1177/0309324710396997 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10443-013-9316-910.1007/s10443-013-9316-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11470910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114709 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.04.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.04.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.004 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-210.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-2 ↗
39. Budynas R, Nisbett JK. Shigley’s mechanical engineering design. New York, 2015.