journal article·2010-11

Processing and mechanical characterization of titanium-graphite hybrid laminates

LR Le Bourlegat, CA Damato, DF da Silva, EC Botelho, LC Pardini

Publisher page

Abstract

Titanium/carbon fiber/epoxy (CF—E) laminates offer many advantages when compared to the traditional metal—fiber laminates and polymer matrix composites for use on aerospace structures. They have many of the advantages of traditional composites such as good strength and stiffness-to-weight ratios. This article displays the mechanical experimental results demonstrating the advantageous influence of titanium/CF—E laminates on specific characteristics of CFRP materials, GLARE ® and CARALL ® . This hybrid laminate was produced with CF—E prepreg and by titanium foil inside of autoclave system. According to this study, the tensile stress, tensile modulus, shear stress, and shear modulus values for titanium/CF—E laminates are superior when compared with GLARE ® and CARALL ® laminates, showing the superiority of this laminate in aerospace applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Depto de Engenharia Mecânica e Aeronáutica, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, CTA, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil, Department of Materials Engineering, Embraer-Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

Department of Materials and Technology, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá, São Paulo, Brazil

Department of Materials and Technology, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá, São Paulo, Brazil,

Divisão de Materiais, Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço, CTA, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-010-0995-910.1007/978-94-010-0995-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.003 ↗
3. 10.1163/156856104270837710.1163/1568561042708377 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-810.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-8 ↗
5. 10.1177/002199830505350910.1177/0021998305053509 ↗
6. Beumler T. · 2004
7. 10.1023/A:102556931682710.1023/A:1025569316827 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:102556931682710.1023/A:1025569316827 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.03310.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.033 ↗
10. Dymácek P. · 2001
11. 10.1016/0142-1123(96)00009-610.1016/0142-1123(96)00009-6 ↗
12. Botelho EC · Mater Sci Eng B · 2007 · 45 · 163
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.031 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.017 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.05.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2007.05.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00086-310.1016/S0013-7944(02)00086-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02652-010.1016/S0924-0136(96)02652-0 ↗
18. Medenblik EW · 1994
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00135-410.1016/S1359-835X(00)00135-4 ↗
20. 10.1177/09636935040130010410.1177/096369350401300104 ↗
21. 10.1177/002199830606529110.1177/0021998306065291 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0013368110.1007/BF00133681 ↗
23. 10.1520/CTR10494J10.1520/CTR10494J ↗
24. 10.1007/s10443-007-9041-310.1007/s10443-007-9041-3 ↗
25. Annual American Standard Test Methods. · 1985
26. Jang BZ · 1994
27. American Society for Testing and Materials. · 2005
28. American Society for Testing and Materials. · 2005
29. 10.1002/app.2683410.1002/app.26834 ↗