Analysis of Corrosion Behavior and Cathodic Protection of Steel Pipeline Under Alternating Current Interference
Source abstract
Abstract
Alternating current (AC)-induced corrosion poses a significant threat to the integrity of underground pipelines, making it a critical concern for pipeline infrastructure. This study investigated the corrosion behavior of protected pipelines subjected to AC interference and developed practical tools to determine the required cathodic protection (CP) measures. Numerical models were developed to simulate current distributions in pipelines, incorporating the effects of metal types, CP levels, and varying AC interferences. These models were rigorously validated and calibrated using laboratory experiments to ensure their reliability. The models were then employed to analyze the corrosion behavior of pipeline metals under diverse CP and AC conditions. The results revealed the critical role of AC interference in aggravating corrosion rates and the diminishing effectiveness of CP at higher AC levels. Additionally, the study highlights the material-dependent nature of corrosion, with X60 pipe steel demonstrating superior resistance compared to C1018 pipe steel. Under the same AC and CP levels, the corrosion rate for C1018 pipe steel is 1.85 to 3.65 times higher than that for X60 pipe steel. Based on numerical analysis, empirical equations were developed to optimize the control of corrosion rates for both C1018 and X60 pipe steels under varying AC and CP conditions. The CP current density required to mitigate corrosion under an AC interference of 50 A/m2 is 1.45 A/m2 for C1018 pipe steel and 0.18 A/m2 for X60 pipe steel. As AC interference increases to 500 A/m2, the required CP current density rises to 2.98 A/m2 for C1018 pipe steel and 2.2 A/m2 for X60 pipe steel, highlighting the increasing demand for cathodic protection at higher AC levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
Funding
USDOT PHMSA Competitive Academic Agreement Program (CAAP)
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. A review on stray current-induced steel corrosion in infrastructure10.1515/corrrev-2017-0009 ↗
2. Corrosive effects of the electromagnetic induction caused by the high voltage power lines on buried X70 steel pipelines10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.03.005 ↗
3. Saida, B., and Cherif, D. (2014, January 22–25). AC corrosion induced by high voltage power line on cathodically protected pipeline. Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, Engineering & Information Technology 2014, Sousse, Tunisia.
4. Experiment research of dynamic stray current interference on buried gas pipeline from urban rail transit10.1016/j.jngse.2013.09.003 ↗
5. Riskin, J., and Khentov, A. (2019). Electrocorrosion and Protection of Metals, Elsevier.
6. New findings on the factors accelerating AC corrosion of buried pipeline10.1016/j.corsci.2013.09.005 ↗
7. Structural integrity of aging buried pipelines having cathodic protection10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.008 ↗
8. AC corrosion of steel pipeline under cathodic protection: A state-of-the-art review10.1002/maco.202313955 ↗
9. (2001). Cathodic Protection of Buried or Immersed Metallic Structures—General Principles and Application for Pipelines (Standard No. EN 12954:2001).
10. Effect of cathodic protection potential fluctuations on pitting corrosion of X100 pipeline steel in acidic soil environment10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.040 ↗
11. Shabangu, T.H., Shrivastava, P., Abe, B.T., Adedeji, K.B., and Olubambi, P.A. (2017, January 18–20). Influence of AC interference on the cathodic protection potentials of pipelines: Towards a comprehensive picture. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE AFRICON, Cape Town, South Africa.10.1109/AFRCON.2017.8095549 ↗
12. Effects of alternating current interference on cathodic protection potential and its effectiveness for corrosion protection of pipelines10.1080/1478422X.2016.1175773 ↗
13. Effect of alternating current on cathodic protection on pipelines10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.028 ↗
14. Numerical simulation of oil and gas pipeline corrosion based on single-or coupled-factor modeling: A critical review10.1016/j.ngib.2023.08.001 ↗
15. Effects of stray AC on delamination of epoxy coatings with defects in 3.5% NaCl solution10.20964/2017.07.48 ↗
16. Effects of stray AC on corrosion of 3-layer polyethylene coated X70 pipeline steel and cathodic delamination of coating with defects in 3.5 wt-% NaCl solution10.1080/1478422X.2018.1436736 ↗
17. Effect of propeller coating on cathodic protection current demand: Sea trial and modeling studies10.5006/0010-9312-68.5.441 ↗
18. Experimental and numerical investigations of effect of alternating current interference corrosion on neighboring pipelines10.1007/s42341-018-0022-z ↗
19. The influence of DC stray current on pipeline corrosion10.1007/s12182-015-0064-3 ↗
20. Zhang, B., Li, L., Zhang, Y., and Wang, J. (2023). Study on the interference law of AC transmission lines on the cathodic protection potential of long-distance transmission pipelines. Magnetochemistry, 9.10.3390/magnetochemistry9030075 ↗
21. Coupled electro-chemical-soil model to evaluate the influence of soil aeration on underground metal pipe corrosion10.5006/2860 ↗
22. Development of a real-time AC/DC data acquisition technique for studies of AC corrosion of pipelines10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.038 ↗
23. (2003). Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens (Standard No. ASTM G1-03(2017)e1).
24. Electric voltage predictions and correlation with density measurements in green-state powder metallurgy compacts10.1023/A:1019928709156 ↗
25. Seri, O., and Siree, B. (2017). The differentiating polarization curve technique for the Tafel parameter estimation. Catalysts, 7.10.3390/catal7080239 ↗
26. Stansbury, E.E., and Buchanan, R.A. (2000). Fundamentals of Electrochemical Corrosion, ASM International.10.31399/asm.tb.fec.9781627083027 ↗
27. Liu, K., Wu, Y., Liu, H., Chen, H., and Li, W. (2024). Numerical Simulation of Galvanic Corrosion and Electrical Insulation for TC4/304 Galvanic Couple. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18010038 ↗
28. Liang, H., Wu, Y., Han, B., Lin, N., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., and Guo, Y. (2024). Corrosion of Buried Pipelines by Stray Current in Electrified Railways: Mechanism, Influencing Factors, and Protection. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010264 ↗
29. (2019). General Principles of Cathodic Protection of Buried or Immersed Onshore Metallic Structures (Standard No. EN 12954:2019).
30. Ormellese, M., Brenna, A., and Lazzari, L. (2015). AC corrosion of cathodically protected buried pipelines: Critical interference values and protection criteria. Nace Corrosion, Nace.