journal article·2025-03-25Open access

Investigation on Decorative Materials for Wardrobe Surfaces with Visual and Tactile Emotional Experience

Dong Jin, Wanting Jiang, Xu Chen, Zhichang Xu, Xiaoxing Yan

Coatings· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

This work investigates the relationship between the material properties of wardrobe furniture and visual and tactile emotional responses, with a focus on age-related differences in emotional experiences. This research measured material surface properties (roughness, gloss, and Lab color) and utilized the PAD (pleasure, arousal, dominance) emotion model to assess emotional responses among elderly and younger participants. (1) In the context of tactile emotional experiences, a systematic correlation was observed between surface roughness and the reported levels of pleasure, arousal, and dominance in both elderly and younger participants. Moreover, pleasure demonstrated a systematic correlation with gloss. Rough surfaces were perceived as unpleasant. The elderly participants showed greater emotional dominance when exposed to rough surfaces. (2) In terms of visual–tactile emotional experiences, a responsive relationship was found between pleasure, dominance, and the a* parameter (representing the red and green color channels) in both age groups. However, no systematic correlations were observed between luminance (L*), glossiness, and PAD emotional experiences in either group. A responsive correlation was found between pleasure, dominance, and the b* parameter (representing the yellow and blue color channels) in elderly individuals. Notably, a significant correlation was observed between arousal and roughness in younger individuals. These findings suggest a partial difference in emotional responses across the PAD dimensions between elderly and younger participants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Multisensory perception and integration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Funding

Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social Science Research

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. (2025, January 15). State Bulletin on Aging 2023, Available online: https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202410/content_6979487.htm.
2. Zhang, W.X., Wang, G., and Liu, S. (2020). Introduction to Geropsychology, Nanjing University Press.
3. The effects of age on sensory thresholds and temporal gap detection in hearing, vision, and touch10.3758/APP.71.4.860 ↗
4. Consumer Attitudes toward Preference and Use of Wood, Woodenware, and Furniture: A Sample from Kayseri, Turkey10.15376/biores.15.1.28-37 ↗
5. Xiong, X.Q., Niu, Y.T., Yuan, Y.Y., and Zhang, L.T. (2020). Study on Dimensional Stability of Veneer Rice Straw Particleboard. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10060558 ↗
6. Peng, X.R., Lu, B., Li, W.G., and Li, B. (2023). Progress in research, development and application of advanced manufacturing technologies for panel furniture in China. Wood Sci. Technol., 37.
7. Perceptual dimensions of wood materials10.1167/jov.24.5.12 ↗
8. Jiang, X.Y. (2010). Design Materials and Processing Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology Press.
9. Bhatta, S.R., Tiippana, K., Vahtikari, K., Hughes, M., and Kyttä, M. (2017). Sensory and Emotional Perception of Wooden Surfaces through Fingertip Touch. Front. Psychol., 8.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00367 ↗
10. Materials’ tactile testing and characterisation for consumer products’ affective packaging design10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.021 ↗
11. The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y ↗
12. A product semantic study of the influence of the sense of touch on the evaluation of wood-based materials10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.069 ↗
13. Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.001 ↗
14. Ackerley, R., Saar, K., McGlone, F., and Wasling, H.B. (2014). Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: Differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 8.10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034 ↗
15. Systematic Relations between Affective and Sensory Material Dimensions in Touch10.1109/TOH.2018.2836427 ↗
16. Drewing, K. (2024). Perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials in younger and older adults. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0296633 ↗
17. The Tactile Perception Evaluation of Wood Surface with Different Roughness and Shapes: A Study Using Galvanic Skin Response10.37763/wr.1336-4561/67.2.311325 ↗
18. Klöcker, A., Oddo, C.M., Camboni, D., Penta, M., and Thonnard, J.L. (2014). Physical Factors Influencing Pleasant Touch during Passive Fingertip Stimulation. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0101361 ↗
19. Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003 ↗
20. Defining pleasant touch stimuli: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s00426-019-01253-8 ↗
21. The arousing power of everyday materials: An analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures10.1007/s00221-016-4574-z ↗
22. Relationship between density and aesthetic attributes of wood and preference of Malagasy consumers10.1007/s13595-013-0299-3 ↗
23. Huang, T., Zhou, C.M., Wang, X.M., and Kaner, J. (2024). A Study of Visual Perception Based on Colour and Texture of Reconstituted Decorative Veneer. Coatings, 14.10.3390/coatings14010057 ↗
24. Rapuano, M., Sarno, M., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G., Iuliano, S., Masullo, M., Maffei, L., Cioffi, F., and Iachini, T. (2023). Emotional Reactions to Different Indoor Solutions: The Role of Age. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13071737 ↗
25. Formation of Visual and Tactile Impressions When Evaluating Wooden Specimens10.2488/jwrs.63.149 ↗
26. Jin, D., and Li, T. (2023). Research on Decorative Materials Properties Used in the Production of Cabinets Based on Visual/Tactile Experience. Coatings, 13.10.3390/coatings13010178 ↗
27. Relating material experience to technical parameters: A case study on visual and tactile warmth perception of indoor wall materials10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.009 ↗
28. Red or rough, what makes materials warmer?10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.028 ↗
29. A touch of gloss: Haptic perception of packaging and consumers’ reactions10.1108/JPBM-05-2017-1472 ↗
30. Looking hot or feeling hot: What determines the product experience of warmth?10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.008 ↗
31. (2009). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Surface Roughness Parameters and Their Values (Standard No. ISO 21920-2:2021).
32. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X ↗
33. Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 ↗
34. Zhang, Z.H., Mir, J.M.F., and Mateu, L.G. (2022). The Effects of White versus Coloured Light in Waiting Rooms on People’s Emotions. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12091356 ↗