A Physics-Guided Parameter Estimation Framework for Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing Simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a physics-guided parameter estimation framework for cold spray additive manufacturing (CSAM), focusing on simulating and validating deposit profiles across diverse process conditions. The proposed model employs a two-zone flow representation: quasi-constant velocity near the nozzle exit followed by an exponentially decaying free jet to capture particle acceleration and impact dynamics. The framework employs a comprehensive approach by numerically integrating drag-dominated particle trajectories to predict deposit formation with high accuracy. This physics-based framework incorporates both operational and geometric parameters to ensure robust prediction capabilities. Operational parameters include spray angle, standoff distance, traverse speed, and powder feed rate, while geometric factors encompass nozzle design characteristics such as exit diameter and divergence angle. Validation is performed using 36 experimentally measured profiles of commercially pure titanium powder. The simulator shows excellent agreement with the experimental data, achieving a global root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.048 mm and a coefficient of determination R2=0.991, improving the mean absolute error by more than 40% relative to a neural network-based approach. Sensitivity analyses reveal that nozzle geometry, feed rate, and critical velocity strongly modulate the amplitude and shape of the deposit. Notably, decreasing the nozzle exit diameter or divergence angle significantly increases local deposition rates, while increasing the standoff distance dampens particle velocities, thereby reducing deposit height. Although the partial differential equation (PDE)-based framework entails a moderate increase in computational time—about 50 s per run, roughly 2.5 times longer than simpler empirical models—this remains practical for most process design and optimization tasks. Beyond its accuracy, the PDE-based simulation framework’s principal advantage lies in its minimal reliance on sampling data. It can readily be adapted to new materials or untested process parameters, making it a powerful predictive tool in cold spray process design. This study underscores the simulator’s potential for guiding parameter selection, improving process reliability and offering deeper physical insights into cold spray deposit formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL 33174, USA
Funding
DEVCOM—Army Research Laboratory
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. The cold spray process and its potential for industrial applications10.1361/105996306X108110 ↗
2. Design and topology/shape structural optimisation for additively manufactured cold sprayed components10.1080/17452759.2013.837629 ↗
3. Multifunctional cold spray coatings for biological and biomedical applications: A review10.1016/j.progsurf.2022.100654 ↗
4. Critical review of corrosion protection by cold spray coatings10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000018 ↗
5. Residual stress development in cold sprayed Al, Cu and Ti coatings10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.033 ↗
6. Fatigue behavior of annealed cold-sprayed 316L stainless steel coating for biomedical applications10.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.030 ↗
7. Silvello, A., Cavaliere, P.D., Albaladejo, V., Martos, A., Dosta, S., and Cano, I.G. (2020). Powder Properties and Processing Conditions Affecting Cold Spray Deposition. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10020091 ↗
8. The Effect of Spray Distance and Scanning Step on the Coating Thickness Uniformity in Cold Spray Process10.1007/s11666-013-0002-0 ↗
9. Influence of Particle Impact Angle on Formation of Profile of Single Coating Track During Cold Spraying10.1063/1.5065085 ↗
10. Ikeuchi, D., Vargas-Uscategui, A., Wu, X., and King, P.C. (2019). Neural Network Modelling of Track Profile in Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12172827 ↗
11. Hamrani, A., Medarametla, A., John, D., and Agarwal, A. (2025). Machine-Learning-Driven Optimization of Cold Spray Process Parameters: Robust Inverse Analysis for Higher Deposition Efficiency. Coatings, 15.10.3390/coatings15010012 ↗
12. Deposit shape control for local repair and welding by cold spray10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.01.023 ↗
13. 3D modelling of the deposit profile in cold spray additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.013 ↗
14. Efficient layer-building approach for promising cold spray additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.083 ↗
15. Influence of a shape of single track on deposition efficiency of 316L stainless steel powder in cold spray10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.052 ↗
16. Modelling of coating thickness distribution and its application in offline programming software10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.044 ↗
17. Ashkenas, H., and Sherman, F. (1966). Structure and Utilization of Supersonic Free Jets in Low Density Wind Tunnels. Rarefied Gasdynamics 4, Academic Press.
18. Champagne, V.K., Ozdemir, O.C., and Nardi, A. (2021). Practical Cold Spray, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-70056-0 ↗
19. Yin, S., and Lupoi, R. (2021). Gas Flow, Particle Acceleration and Heat Transfer in Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing. Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing. Springer Tracts in Additive Manufacturing.10.1007/978-3-030-73367-4 ↗
20. Spherical particles velocity in a supersonic jet flowing out from an ejector nozzle used in cold spray10.1063/1.5065134 ↗
21. Bonding mechanism in cold gas spraying10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00274-X ↗
22. Characterization of Cold Spray Titanium Supersonic Jet10.1007/s11666-008-9278-x ↗
23. Supersonic Cold Spraying for Energy and Environmental Applications: One-Step Scalable Coating Technology for Advanced Micro- and Nanotextured Materials10.1002/adma.201905028 ↗
24. A comparative review on cold gas dynamic spraying processes and technologies
25. Leitz, K.H., O’Sullivan, M., Plankensteiner, A., Lichtenegger, T., Pirker, S., Kestler, H., and Sigl, L. (June, January 29). CFDEM Modelling of Particle Heating and Acceleration in Cold Spraying. Proceedings of the 19th Plansee Seminar, Plansee SE, Reutte, Austria.
26. Żórawski, W., Molak, R., Mądry, J., Sienicki, J., Góral, A., Makrenek, M., Scendo, M., and Dobosz, R. (2021). Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Titanium Deposition for Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing as a Function of Standoff Distance. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14195492 ↗
27. Zybała, R., Bucholc, B., Kaszyca, K., Kowiorski, K., Soboń, D., Żórawski, W., Moszczyńska, D., Molak, R., and Pakieła, Z. (2022). Properties of Cold Sprayed Titanium and Titanium Alloy Coatings after Laser Surface Treatment. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15249014 ↗
28. Cold Spraying of Titanium: A Review of Bonding Mechanisms, Microstructure and Properties10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.533.53 ↗