journal article·2024-07-30Open access

Clinical Analysis of the Influence of Surface Roughness in the Primary Stability and Osseointegration of Dental Implants: Study in Humans

Igor da Silva Brum, Carlos Nelson Elias, João Carlos Amorim Lopes, Lucio Frigo, Paulo Gonçalo Pinto dos Santos, Jorge José de Carvalho

Coatings· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

In past decades, the success rates of the first dental implant treatments were low (75%). Nowadays, oral rehabilitation with titanium dental implants has a high success rate (95%–98%). The success rate significantly increases due to increased scientific knowledge about osseointegration, changes in surgical techniques, and the development of implant surface treatments. Despite the high success rate of implants, there are no protocols to define the time for the prosthesis to be installed, the insertion torque, and the prosthesis loaded after surgery. This work compares a new dental implant’s primary (mechanical) and secondary (osseointegration) stability. Dental implants with micro- and nano-roughness surfaces were placed in 24 patients with a minimum of 35 N·cm and a maximum of 60 N·cm. Primary stability was quantified with a torque wrench and an Ostell Mentor Device. The secondary stability 45 and 60 days after surgery was measured with Ostell. The results showed no statistical difference in secondary stability at 45 and 60 days postoperatively among implants. The success rate of dental implants can be associated with the surface morphology with micro- and nano-roughness, the insertion torque value, and the shape of the implant threads. When the manufacturer’s guidelines are followed, it is possible to prosthetically rehabilitate the patient with an implant 45 days after surgery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20551-030, Brazil

Materials Science Department, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil

Dental School, Portuguese Catholic University, 1649-023 Viseu, Portugal

Basic Sciences Department, Faculdade de Odontologia da APCD, São Paulo 02011-000, Brazil

Department of Histology and Embryology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20551-030, Brazil

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. (2017). Standard Specification for Unalloyed Titanium, for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R50250, UNS R50400, UNS R50550, UNS R50700) (Standard No. ASTM F67-13(2017)).
2. (2021). Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56401) (Standard No. ASTM F136-13(2021)e1).
3. Study on the immunopathological effect of titanium particles in peri-implantitis granulation tissue: A case–control study10.1111/clr.13928 ↗
4. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0052 ↗
5. Observational Study on the Success Rate of Osseointegration: A Prospective Analysis of 15,483 Implants in a Public Health Setting10.3390/biomed2040033 ↗
6. Systemic levels of metallic ions released from orthodontic mini-implants10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.045 ↗
7. Katić, J., Krivačić, S., Petrović, Ž., Mikić, D., and Marciuš, M. (2023). Titanium Implant Alloy Modified by Electrochemically Deposited Functional Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Coatings. Coatings, 13.10.3390/coatings13030640 ↗
8. Integrity of implant surface modifications after insertion10.11607/jomi.3259 ↗
9. Clinical Evaluation of Anodized Surface Implants Submitted to a Counter Torque of 25 Ncm After 60 Days of Osseointegration: Study in Humans10.1007/s12663-013-0582-8 ↗
10. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading
11. Turkyilmaz, I., and McGlumphy, E.A. (2008). Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: A retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health, 8.10.1186/1472-6831-8-32 ↗
12. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: A review of the literature
13. Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test10.5051/jpis.2013.43.1.30 ↗
14. Does the timing of implant placement and loading influence biological outcomes of implant-supported multiple-unit fixed dental prosthesis—A systematic review with meta-analyses10.1111/clr.13860 ↗
15. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.1.57 ↗
16. Surface structure characteristics of dental implants and their potential changes following installation: A literature review10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.114 ↗
17. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: An in vitro study10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60092-4 ↗
18. Comuzzi, L., Tumedei, M., Pontes, A.E., Piattelli, A., and Iezzi, G. (2020). Primary Stability of Dental Implants in Low-Density (10 and 20 pcf) Polyurethane Foam Blocks: Conical vs Cylindrical Implants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17082617 ↗
19. Measurement of the gap between abutment and fixture in dental conical connection implants. A focused ion beam SEM observation10.4317/medoral.23281 ↗
20. Short Dental Implants (6 mm) Versus Standard Dental Implants (10 mm) Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla and/or Mandible: 2-Year Results from a Prospective Cohort Comparative Trial10.5037/jomr.2018.9304 ↗
21. Gehrke, S.A., Aramburú Júnior, J., Treichel, T.L.E., and Dedavid, B.A. (2022). Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different implant macrogeometries in the early osseointegration process: An in vivo animal study. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 125.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104935 ↗
22. Gehrke, S.A., Pereira, G.M.A., Gehrke, A.F., Junior, N.D.B., and Dedavid, B.A. (2021). Effects of insertion torque on the structure of dental implants with different connections: Experimental pilot study in vitro. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0251904 ↗
23. Ultrastructural Characterization of the Titanium Surface Degree IV in Dental Implant Aluminum Free (Acid Attack)10.4236/jbnb.2020.113009 ↗