A Study on the Visual and Tactile Perception of Oriented Strand Board Combined with Consumer-Preference Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This study on oriented strand board (OSB) wood doors with veneer as the door leaf aimed to investigate consumers’ preference for visual–tactile elements of OSB. First, we utilized the questionnaire and interview methods to extract specific elements as experimental variables for this study. Then, through subjective evaluation experiments and eye-movement experiments, as well as correlation analyses of the experimental results, we explored the relationship between the slice size, gloss, and color of oriented strand boards and consumers’ visual preferences and summarized the eye-movement indexes that can represent consumers’ aesthetic evaluation of the visual elements of oriented strand boards. Unidirectional haptic experiments analyzed the relationships between the slice size, gloss, and roughness of the oriented strand boards and consumers’ haptic preferences. The results showed that, visually, chip size and surface gloss had little effect on people’s subjective aesthetic evaluations of oriented strand-board wood doors. At the same time, the quantitative mean pupil diameter could represent consumers’ aesthetic evaluations of oriented strand boards. Regarding haptics, the size of the wood chips on the surface of the oriented strand-board specimens did not significantly correlate with participants’ haptic preferences. All participants’ tactile preferences for the unpainted specimens were positively correlated with the fineness of sanding. The visual and tactile effects presented on the surface of an object are essential factors that influence the perception of a material. Oriented strand board (OSB) has excellent advantages in providing a healthy and environmentally friendly living environment, so exploring the visual and tactile perception of OSB from the consumer’s point of view plays a vital role in promoting the use of OSB. The visual–tactile experimental results and the conclusions drawn from the analysis in this study can enable OSB to provide more opinions and potential information from consumers for the design of OSB wooden doors under the premise of conforming to the actual production and meeting the quality standards so that the designed and produced OSB wooden doors can satisfy the users’ preferences based on safety and stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Multisensory perception and integration · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing 210037, China
Funding
National Art Fund Traditional
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Low Formaldehyde Emission Particleboard Bonded by Uf-Mdi Mixture Adhesive
2. Status and Development Trends of Wooden Door Industry in China
3. Life Cycle Analysis of a Novel Treatment Method for Recycling Wood Processing Residues into the Core Material of Wooden Doors10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137798 ↗
4. China Wood Industry. Analyses on Quality Evaluation Indexes for Solid Wood Composite Door
5. Improve the Bonding between Wood Veneer and Wood Fiber/High-Density Polyethylene Composite Board for Decoration10.1002/pc.26529 ↗
6. Buehlmann, U., Bumgardner, M., Schuler, A., and Barford, M. (2007). Assessing the Impacts of Global Competition on the Appalachian Hardwood Industry. For. Prod. J., 57.
7. Attribute Elicitation: Implications in the Research Context
8. Sharan, L. (2010). The Perception of Material Qualities in Real-World Images. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
9. Surface Roughness of Sliced Veneers in Terms of Defects and Wood Structure Variability—Impact of Mild Hydrothermal Treatment10.5552/drvind.2022.2129 ↗
10. Classification of wood knots using artificial neural networks with texture and local feature-based image descriptors10.1515/hf-2021-0051 ↗
11. Interior Wood Use: Linking User Perceptions to Physical Properties10.1080/02827581.2017.1287299 ↗
12. Consumers’ Perceptions and Preference Profiles for Wood Surfaces Tested with Pairwise Comparison in Germany10.1007/s13595-014-0452-7 ↗
13. Multiresolutional Image Analysis of Wood and Other Materials10.1007/BF00579518 ↗
14. Rajemison, and Florent Eyma. Relationship between Density and Aesthetic Attributes of Wood and Preference of Malagasy Consumers10.1007/s13595-013-0299-3 ↗
15. Ohira, H., and Hirao, N. (2015). Analysis of skin conductance response during evaluation of preferences for cosmetic products. Front. Psychol., 6.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00103 ↗
16. Consumer Neuroscience: Assessing the Brain Response to Marketing Stimuli Using Electroencephalogram (Eeg) and Eye Tracking10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095 ↗
17. Can Eye-Tracking Data Be Measured to Assess Product Design? Visual Attention Mechanism Should Be Considered10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.001 ↗
18. Sperling, G., and Dosher, B. (1986). Handbook of Perception and Performance, International Society for Optics and Photonics.
19. Tactual Perception of Material Properties10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.005 ↗
20. Characterizing Affiliative Touch in Humans and Its Role in Advancing Haptic Design10.1111/nyas.15056 ↗
21. Textured Polymer Surfaces Mimicking the Tactile Friction between Wood and Skin10.1007/s11837-020-04513-w ↗
22. Effects of Task Demands on Tactile Vigilance10.1007/s00221-022-06538-w ↗
23. Understanding the Effects of Tactile Grating Patterns on Perceived Roughness over Ultrasonic Friction Modulation Surfaces10.1177/00187208211064025 ↗
24. Visual-Tactual Incongruities in Products as Sources of Surprise10.2190/EM.27.1.d ↗
25. Impacts of User Expectation and Disconfirmation on Satisfaction and Behavior Intention: The Moderating Effect of Expectation Levels10.1080/10447318.2022.2095479 ↗
26. A Study on the Possibility of Achieving Life Cycle Carbon Minus in Apartment Houses10.3130/aije.87.169 ↗