journal article·2024-06-13Open access

The Effect of Different Coating Agents on the Microhardness, Water Sorption, and Solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT

Saleh Y. Alqasabi, Ayman M. Sulimany, Thamer Almohareb, Abdullah S. Alayad, Omar A. Bawazir

Coatings· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of four different surface-coating agents on the microhardness, water sorption, and solubility of the highly viscous glass ionomer cement EQUIA Forte® HT. Materials and methods: A total of 100 cylindrical EQUIA Forte® HT samples were examined, with 50 tested for Vickers hardness and the other 50 for water sorption and solubility. For each test, the specimens were divided into five groups (10 specimens/group) according to coating method: Group 1—no coating (control), Group 2—EQUIA Forte® Coat, Group 3—Single Bond™ Universal Adhesive, Group 4—ExciTE®F adhesive, and Group 5—petroleum jelly. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean microhardness of the coated groups was significantly higher than that of the uncoated group. Moreover, a significant difference in the microhardness value was detected between the coated groups. Furthermore, EQUIA Forte® Coat had the highest mean hardness value. The mean water sorption at 7 days showed that EQUIA Forte® Coat had the lowest values. In terms of water solubility, a statistically significant difference was found between no coating and all groups except EQUIA Forte®, between Single Bond Universal Adhesive and petroleum jelly, between petroleum jelly and EQUIA Forte Coat, and between EQUIA Forte® Coat and ExciTE®F. Conclusions: The study revealed that all coating agents significantly increased the microhardness of EQUIA Forte® HT, with EQUIA Forte® Coat showing the highest hardness and the lowest water sorption values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia

Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. A New Translucent Cement for Dentistry. The Glass Ionomer Cement10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810 ↗
2. Coating Glass-Ionomer Cements with a Nanofilled Resin10.3109/00016357.2011.639307 ↗
3. Croll, T.P., and Nicholson, J.W. (2002). Nicholson 423 Glass Ionomer Cement and Adjunct Professor. Pediatr. Dent., 24.
4. The Recharge of Esthetic Dental Restorative Materials with Fluoride In Vitro—Two Years’ Results10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00011-8 ↗
5. Brkanović, S., Ivanišević, A., Miletić, I., Mezdić, D., and Krmek, S.J. (2021). Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different Ph Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14040755 ↗
6. Toughness, Bonding and Fluoride-Release Properties of Hydroxyapatite-Added Glass Ionomer Cement10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00260-6 ↗
7. Effects of Incorporation of HA/ZrO2 into Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC)10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.019 ↗
8. The Influence of Montmorillonite Clay Reinforcement on the Performance of a Glass Ionomer Restorative10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.005 ↗
9. Reinforcement of Conventional Glass-Ionomer Restorative Material with Short Glass Fibers10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.04.002 ↗
10. The Incorporation of Casein Phosphopeptide–Amorphous Calcium Phosphate into a Glass Ionomer Cement10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.008 ↗
11. Influence of Niobium Pentoxide Addition on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements10.1080/23337931.2016.1239182 ↗
12. Evaluation of Cavity Wall Adaptation of Bulk Esthetic Materials to Restore Class II Cavities in Primary Molars10.1007/s00784-016-1848-6 ↗
13. Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Resins and Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: A 1-Year Follow-up Randomized Clinical Trial in Children10.4103/njcp.njcp_519_19 ↗
14. Clinical Performance during 48 Months of Two Current Glass Ionomer Restorative Systems with Coatings: A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Field10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8 ↗
15. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth: Quo Vadis?10.2341/15-331-C ↗
16. A Randomized Controlled 10 Years Follow up of a Glass Ionomer Restorative Material in Class I and Class II Cavities10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.013 ↗
17. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Two High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cements in Class II Restorations of Primary Molars10.1111/adj.12802 ↗
18. Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-Year Multicenter Study
19. Six-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Two Glass Ionomer Cements in Class II Cavities10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103333 ↗
20. Comparative Evaluation of the Physical Properties of a Reinforced Glass Ionomer Dental Restorative Material10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.012 ↗
21. Comparison of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements and Microhybrid Composite
22. Color Stability, Roughness, and Water Sorption/Solubility of Glass Ionomer–Based Restorative Materials10.4103/njcp.njcp_592_18 ↗
23. Investigation of Water Sorption and Aluminum Releases from High Viscosity and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer
24. Dental Glass Ionomer Cements as Permanent Filling Materials?—Properties, Limitations and Future Trends10.3390/ma3010076 ↗
25. Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-Fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis10.2341/16-365-L ↗
26. Effect of Surface Coatings on Flexural Properties of Glass Ionomers10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00148.x ↗
27. Glass Ionomer Cement Hardness after Different Materials for Surface Protection10.1002/jbm.a.32524 ↗
28. Glass Ionomer Cement Surface Protection
29. Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials: A Sticky Subject?10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x ↗
30. Resistance to Degradation of Bonded Restorations to Simulated Caries-Affected Primary Dentin
31. Krajangta, N., Dulsamphan, C., and Chotitanmapong, T. (2022). Effects of Protective Surface Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement. Dent. J., 10.10.3390/dj10120233 ↗
32. Octarina the Effect of Nanofilled Resin Coating on the Hardness of Glass Ionomer Cement10.4103/SDJ.SDJ_5_20 ↗
33. Effect of Protective Coating on Microhardness of a New Glass Ionomer Cement: Nanofilled Coating versus Unfilled Resin10.4103/JCD.JCD_83_16 ↗
34. Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating on Microhardness and Wear Resistance of Glass-Ionomer Cements10.5933/JKAPD.2019.46.2.226 ↗
35. Water Sorption and Solubility of a High-Viscous Glass-Ionomer Cement after the Application of Different Surface-Coating Agents10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_50_20 ↗
36. Sakaguchi, R.L., and Powers, J.M. (2012). Fundamentals of Materials Science. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, Mosby.
37. Test Methods Used in the Evaluation of the Structure Features of the Restorative Materials: A Literature Review10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.049 ↗
38. Mazumdar, P., and Chowdhury, D. (2021). Manual of Laboratory Testing Methods for Dental Restorative Materials, Wiley. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119688044 ↗
39. Effect of Protective Surface Coating on Hardness of Recent Uncoated High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
40. The Effect of Filler Loading and Morphology on the Mechanical Properties of Contemporary Composites10.1067/mpr.2002.125179 ↗
41. Materials Science Effect of Filler Content and Size on Properties of Composites10.1177/00220345850640121501 ↗
42. Fluoride Releasing/Recharging Ability of Bulk-Fill and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements After the Application of Different Surface Coating Agents: An In-Vitro Study10.21608/adjc.2020.26342.1063 ↗
43. Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: The Effect of a Resinous Coat on Ion Release10.15644/asc54/4/4 ↗
44. Tarifard, A. (2014). The Effect of Adhesive Systems on Fluoride Release of a Conventional Glass Ionomer: An In Vitro Study. [Master’s Thesis, Tufts University].
45. The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Technique: Does It Have a Place in Everyday Practice?10.12968/denu.2000.27.3.118 ↗
46. Water Sorption and Solubility of an Experimental Dental Material: Comparative Study
47. Relationship between the Degree of Conversion, Solubility and Salivary Sorption of a Hybrid and a Nanofilled Resin Composite10.1590/S1678-77572008000200015 ↗
48. Single-Bottle Adhesives Behave as Permeable Membranes after Polymerization. I. In Vivo Evidence10.1016/j.jdent.2004.04.006 ↗
49. Water Sorption and Solubility of Dentin Bonding Agents Light-Cured with Different Light Sources10.1016/j.jdent.2006.09.002 ↗
50. Water Sorption/Solubility of Dental Adhesive Resins10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020 ↗
51. Water Sorption in Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cements: An In Vitro Comparison with Other Materials10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00135-X ↗
52. Long-Term Sorption and Solubility of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin-Composites in Water and Artificial Saliva10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.001 ↗
53. Effect of Water on the Physical Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00016-0 ↗