journal article·2023-02-18Open access

Wear Behavior of Monolithic Zirconia after Staining, Glazing, and Polishing Opposing Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study

Lívia Fiorin, Paulo Eduardo Barros Souza Oliveira, Allan Oliveira da Silva, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Ana Paula Macedo, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues

Coatings· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of staining, glazing, and polishing on the wear behavior of stabilized zirconia with 5 mol% of yttrium oxide (5Y-TZP) opposing 5Y-TZP, leucite-reinforced ceramic (LC), lithium disilicate (LD), and microhybrid composite resin (MCR). Hemispheres of 5Y-TZP were divided into six groups (n = 10) according to the finishing procedure: C (control), S (staining), G (glazing), P (polishings), SG (staining plus glazing), and SP (staining plus polishing). The two-body wear test (2BW) was performed (20 N load, at 2 Hz, until 300,000 cycles). Vertical height loss of hemispheres (VHL) and wear depth of restorative materials (WD) were analyzed using a profile projector and laser confocal microscope, respectively. Data of VHL and WD were analyzed using a generalized linear model by the Wald test and t post hoc test with the Bonferroni adjustment (α = 0.05). The staining, glazing, polishing, and restorative material had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on VHL and WD. Polishing reduced VHL opposing MCR, LC, and LD. There was an increase in WD to G opposing LD and SG opposing MCR. The 5Y-TZP presented the highest wear resistance, while MCR presented the lowest. Polishing was recommended to promote staining durability and decrease wear rates opposing MCR and LD.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Oral Rehabilitation Graduate Program, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirao Preto of University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirao Preto of University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation—FAPESP · Agency for the High-Standard Promotion of Graduate Courses—CAPES

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I
2. Novel Zirconia Materials in Dentistry10.1177/0022034517737483 ↗
3. Translucent zirconia in the ceramic scenario for monolithic restorations: A flexural strength and translucency comparison test10.1016/j.jdent.2017.03.002 ↗
4. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review10.1111/jopr.12740 ↗
5. Effect of external staining on the optical properties and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia of different thicknesses10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.014 ↗
6. Translucency and mechanical behavior of partially stabilized monolithic zirconia after staining, finishing procedures and artificial aging10.1038/s41598-022-20120-y ↗
7. The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconia10.4012/dmj.2015-054 ↗
8. Effect of pigmentation techniques on the fatigue mechanical behavior of a translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105362 ↗
9. Effect of toothbrushing on shade and surface roughness of extrinsically stained pressable ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.013 ↗
10. Color stability of CAD/CAM ceramics prepared with different surface finishing procedures10.1111/jopr.13019 ↗
11. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies10.1111/jerd.12823 ↗
12. Recent advances in understanding the fatigue and wear behavior of dental composites and ceramics10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.008 ↗
13. Fatigue and wear of human tooth enamel: A review10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105574 ↗
14. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003 ↗
15. Effect of zirconia polycrystal and stainless steel on the wear of resin composites, dentin and enamel10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.024 ↗
16. Three-body wear effect on different CAD/CAM ceramics staining durability10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103579 ↗
17. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature review10.1067/mpr.2002.123851 ↗
18. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.010 ↗
19. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.002 ↗
20. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0 ↗
21. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008 ↗
22. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.002 ↗
23. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.009 ↗
24. Fatigue and wear behavior of zirconia materials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103970 ↗
25. Effect of surface treatments on wear and surface properties of different CAD-CAM materials and their enamel antagonists
26. Wear of monolithic zirconia against different CAD-CAM and indirect restorative materials
27. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3 ↗
28. Hatanaka, A., Sawada, T., Sen, K., Saito, T., Sasaki, K., Someya, T., Hattori, M., and Takemoto, S. (2022). Wear behavior between aesthetic restorative materials and bovine tooth enamel. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155234 ↗
29. Wear behavior and abrasiveness of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics after simulated mastication10.1007/s00784-022-04611-w ↗
30. Wear of various restorative materials against 5Y-ZP zirconia10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.009 ↗
31. Evaluation of wear behavior of dental restorative materials against zirconia in vitro10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.016 ↗
32. Effect of grinding and polishing on roughness and strength of zirconia10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.003 ↗
33. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003 ↗
34. Effect of surface finishing treatments on the color stability of CAD/CAM materials10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.150 ↗
35. Wear resistance and compression strength of ceramics tested in fluoride environments10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.039 ↗
36. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual axis chewing simulator10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00416.x ↗
37. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60068-8 ↗
38. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.004 ↗
39. The effect of aging on the wear performance of monolithic zirconia10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.018 ↗
40. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00306.x ↗
41. Low-Fusing Porcelain Glaze Application on 3Y-TZP Surfaces can Enhance Zirconia-Porcelain Adhesion10.1590/0103-6440201601014 ↗
42. Effect of surface treatment on flexural strength of zirconia bars10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60100-X ↗
43. The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.022 ↗
44. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods. A review10.4012/dmj.2018-140 ↗
45. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004 ↗