journal article·2023-01-16Open access

Mechanical Stability of Self-Adhesive/Ion-Releasing Resin Composites

Abdulrahman Alshabib, Abdullah Alshehri, Carlos A. Jurado, Ali Alrahlah, Abdulrahman Almazrou, Mansour Albuhayri, Abdullah Alnujaym, Abdullah Almuhanna, Nicholas G. Fischer, Hamad Algamaiah

Coatings· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of water storage on the surface microhardness (VHN) and fracture toughness (K1C) of two self-adhesive restorative materials compared to traditional resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorative materials. Methods: Two self-adhesive materials (Activa and Vertise Flow), a nonflowable composite (Filtek Z250), and an RMGIC (Fuji II) were evaluated. Hardness measurements (n = 12) were recorded at three time intervals: (i) one-hour post-irradiation; (ii) after one day of storage in water at 37 °C; and (iii) after 90 days of storage in water at 37 °C. Fracture toughness (K1C) measurements (n = 12) were conducted after one day of storage in water at 37 °C and 90 days of storage in water at 37 °C. ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Baseline VHN data were 38.2–58.3, decreasing significantly to 28.8–55.6 following 90 days of water storage. The Filtek Z250 had the highest VHN before and after storage, while the Activa had the lowest. KIC values varied between 0.98–1.32 MPa·m0.5. The highest value was for the Filtek Z250 while the Fuji II showed the lowest value (after both 1 and 90 days of storage in water). However, KIC values decreased significantly after storage, except for the Fuji II. Conclusion: Self-adhesive/ion-releasing resin composites were negatively affected by water storage. Material reinforcements are possible future areas to explore.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Operative, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Dental and Oral Rehabilitation, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia

Department of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

Dental Intern, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. The Evolution of Dental Materials over the Past Century: Silver and Gold to Tooth Color and Beyond10.1177/0022034518822808 ↗
2. The Minamata Convention and the phase down of dental amalgam10.2471/BLT.17.203141 ↗
3. The teaching of posterior resin composites: Planning for the future based on 25 years of research10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.014 ↗
4. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003 ↗
5. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth
6. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.001 ↗
7. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, A., Sokolowski, J., Kleczewska, J., and Bociong, K. (2020). Ageing of Dental Composites Based on Methacrylate Resins-A Critical Review of the Causes and Method of Assessment. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12040882 ↗
8. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion10.1177/00220345900690010501 ↗
9. Factors involved in mechanical fatigue degradation of dental resin composites10.1177/0022034513490734 ↗
10. Hydrolytic degradation of composite resins: Effects on the microhardness10.1590/S1516-14392003000400029 ↗
11. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6 ↗
12. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 ↗
13. Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.007 ↗
14. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials—A systematic review10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013 ↗
15. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites10.1177/00220345840630101701 ↗
16. Hydrolytic and biological degradation of bulk-fill and self-adhering resin composites10.2341/17-390-L ↗
17. Elution of leachable components from composites10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x ↗
18. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0 ↗
19. Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC10.1002/jbm.b.30252 ↗
20. Identification and Quantification of Monomers Released from Dental Composites Using HPLC10.1590/S1516-89132009000400009 ↗
21. Resin-based composite performance: Are there some things we can’t predict?10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013 ↗
22. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites10.1067/mpr.2002.125179 ↗
23. Indentation hardness measurements at macro-, micro-, and nanoscale: A critical overview10.1007/s11249-016-0805-5 ↗
24. Review of the fracture toughness approach10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.151 ↗
25. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products10.1177/10454411010120020401 ↗
26. Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.017 ↗
27. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y ↗
28. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00042-8 ↗
29. Compressive strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material: Effect of P/L ratio and storage time10.1590/S1678-77572005000400008 ↗
30. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods—A review10.4012/dmj.2018-140 ↗
31. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8 ↗
32. Wear Behavior and Surface Quality of Dental Bioactive Ions-Releasing Resins Under Simulated Chewing Conditions10.3389/froh.2021.628026 ↗
33. In vitro wear of dual-cured bulkfill composites and flowable bulkfill composites10.1111/jerd.12616 ↗
34. Resin composite--state of the art10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 ↗
35. Post-irradiation surface viscoelastic integrity of photo-polymerized resin-based composites10.1016/j.dental.2021.09.012 ↗
36. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x ↗
37. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate (GPDM) with hydroxyapatite and dentin10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.003 ↗
38. Hollow glass fibers in reinforcing glass ionomer cements10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.004 ↗
39. Toughness of glass fibres reinforced glass-ionomer cements10.1023/A:1013149926490 ↗
40. Fiber reinforcement of a resin modified glass ionomer cement10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.003 ↗
41. High-performance piezoelectric composites via β phase programming10.1038/s41467-022-32518-3 ↗