Influence of Alternative and Conventional Surface Treatments on the Bonding Mechanism between PEEK and Veneering Resin for Dental Application
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the influence of conventional and alternative surface treatments on wettability and the bond strength between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and veneering resin. PEEK samples were randomly divided into five groups: sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s, and tribochemical silica coating plus heated silane. One of them was subjected to analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and ten were analyzed by goniometry (n = 5) and scanning electron microscopy (n = 5). Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested, and failure types were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey and Duncan tests (all, α = 5%). Treatment with sandblasting and silica coating had the lowest SBS means (4.2 MPa and 4.4 MPa respectively), while sulfuric acid for 5 s showed the highest mean value (12.6 MPa), followed by sulfuric acid for 30 s and tribochemical + heated silane. All failures were classified as adhesive. The lowest mean contact angle was found for the polished (control) and etched group with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s (83.9°). Etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s increased the SBS between resin and PEEK.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biotechnology Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), RENORBIO, 1468 Marechal Campos Avenue, Vitória 29043-900, ES, Brazil
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), 777 Eng. José Longo Avenue, São José dos Campos 12245-000, SP, Brazil
Physics Department, Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), 50 Marechal Eduardo Gomes Square, São José dos Campos 12228-900, SP, Brazil
MSc-PhD Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontic Unit), Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 1184 Marechal Floriano Peixoto Street, Santa Maria 97015-372, RS, Brazil
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Co-cure joining of epoxy composites with rapidly UV-irradiated PEEK and PPS composites to achieve high structural integrity10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112595 ↗
2. Future opportunities for bio-based adhesives-advantages beyond renewability10.1039/C8GC03746A ↗
3. Selective responses of human gingival fibroblasts and bacteria on carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone with multilevel nanostructured TiO210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.001 ↗
4. Comparison of osteointegration property between PEKK and PEEK: Effects of surface structure and chemistry10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.014 ↗
5. A biomimetically hierarchical polyetherketoneketone scaffold for osteoporotic bone repair10.1126/sciadv.abc4704 ↗
6. Indications, materials and properties of 3D printing in dentistry: A literature overview10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10632 ↗
7. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses10.1016/j.jare.2020.09.004 ↗
8. Polyetheretherketone—A suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?
9. Panayotov, I.V., Orti, V., Cuisinier, F., and Yachouh, J. (2016). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 27.10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4 ↗
10. Giudice, R.L., and Tribst, J.P.M. (2020). Dental materials coatings: Effect on the clinical behavior. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10121229 ↗
11. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials10.1111/clr.12454 ↗
12. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.024 ↗
13. Campaner, L.M., Silveira, M.P.M., de Andrade, G.S., Borges, A.L.S., Bottino, M.A., de Dal Piva, A.M.O., Lo Giudice, R., Ausiello, P., and Tribst, J.P.M. (2021). Influence of polymeric restorative materials on the stress distribution in posterior fixed partial dentures: 3D finite element analysis. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13050758 ↗
14. Villefort, R.F., Tribst, J.P.M., Dal Piva, A.M.O., Borges, A.L., Binda, N.C., Ferreira, C.E.A., Bottino, M.A., and von Zeidler, S.L.V. (2020). Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0241589 ↗
15. Effect of different materials and undercut on the removal force and stress distribution in circumferential clasps during direct retainer action in removable partial dentures10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.022 ↗
16. de Araújo Nobre, M., Moura Guedes, C., Almeida, R., Silva, A., and Sereno, N. (2020). Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med., 9.10.3390/jcm9072187 ↗
17. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: A clinical report10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.026 ↗
18. Does the prosthesis weight matter? 3D finite element analysis of a fixed implant-supported prosthesis at different weights and implant numbers10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.67 ↗
19. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of hemimaxillectomy defects with CAD/CAM suprastructures10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.009 ↗
20. Rauch, A., Hahnel, S., Günther, E., Bidmon, W., and Schierz, O. (2020). Materials Tooth-Colored CAD/CAM Materials for Application An Illustrated Clinical Comparison. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13245588 ↗
21. Influence of Low-Temperature Environmental Exposure on the Mechanical Properties and Structural Stability of Dental Zirconia10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00838.x ↗
22. Bonding of the polymer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to human dentin: Effect of surface treatments10.1590/0103-6440201600796 ↗
23. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials (DEMA-D-13-00481)10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011 ↗
24. Study on the pretreatment of poly(ether ether ketone)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composites through environmentally friendly chemical etching and electrical properties of the chemically metallized composites10.1021/am4037806 ↗
25. Effects of different sulfuric acid etching concentrations on PEEK surface bonding to resin composite10.4012/dmj.2017-141 ↗
26. Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.071 ↗
27. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003 ↗
28. Ourahmoune, R., Salvia, M., Mathia, T.G., Berthel, B., Fouvry, S., and Mesrati, N. (2011, January 21–26). Effect of sandblasting substrate treatment on single lap shear strength of adhesively bonded PEEK and its composites. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Jeju Island, Korea.
29. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites10.1002/sca.21089 ↗
30. Effect of grit blasting and spraying angle on the adhesion strength of a plasma-sprayed coating10.1361/10599630421406 ↗
31. Effect of substrate roughness on splatting behavior of HVOF sprayed polymer particles: Modeling and experiments
32. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014 ↗
33. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements
34. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites
35. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7 ↗
36. The Role of Silane Coupling Agents and Universal Primers in Durable Adhesion to Dental Restorative Materials—A Review10.1007/s40496-016-0108-9 ↗
37. Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.009 ↗
38. Effect of post-silanization heat treatments of silanized feldspathic ceramic on adhesion to resin cement
39. Mullite crystallization using fully hydrolyzed silica sol: The gelation temperature influence10.1007/s10971-014-3285-9 ↗
40. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of various adhesives and surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to polyetheretherketone10.1111/jopr.12791 ↗
41. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK)10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010 ↗
42. Polyetheretherketone—A suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?10.1002/jbm.b.32932 ↗
43. Lümkemann, N., Eichberger, M., and Stawarczyk, B. (2017). Bonding to different PEEK compositions: The impact of dental light curing units. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10010067 ↗
44. Modification of Poly(ether ether ketone) Polymer for Fuel Cell Application10.1155/2013/386903 ↗
45. Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.029 ↗
46. Influence of cutting conditions on machinability aspects of PEEK, PEEK CF 30 and PEEK GF 30 composites using PCD tools10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.060 ↗
47. Adhesion to high-performance polymers applied in dentistry: A systematic review10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.002 ↗