The Development of a Novel Thin Film Test Method to Evaluate the Rain Erosion Resistance of Polyaspartate-Based Leading Edge Protection Coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
The relationship between the bulk thermomechanical properties and rain erosion resistance of development polyaspartate-based coatings as candidate leading edge protection (LEP) materials for wind turbine blades is investigated by the combined application of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and rain erosion testing (RET) within a novel test method (DMA+RET). This method introduces the use of DMA+RET to both monitor the change in thermomechanical properties with respect to raindrop impact and subsequently rationalise differences in rain erosion resistance between coating formulations of comparable composition. The application of this combined process has demonstrated the importance of relatively high viscoelastic moduli at increased strain rates and creep recovery after RET as key material properties to be considered for LEP material development, whereas previous research presented in the scientific literature has primarily focussed on the use of routine characterisation procedures by tensile testing or stand-alone DMA to evaluate coating formulations prior to rain erosion testing. This journal article therefore presents a novel method to evaluate key material properties relevant to rain erosion resistance before and after subjection to raindrop impact using standard ASTM G73 RET equipment. The test method is demonstrated on a novel polyaspartate-based coating, PA-U, that exhibits notable rain erosion resistance in comparison to commercial LEP products. PA-U exhibited negligible mass loss after 30 h of rain erosion testing and favourable thermomechanical properties (E″ = 35 MPa at critical strain; equilibrium recoverable compliance of 0.05 MPa−1) in comparison to alternative formulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult, Offshore House, Albert Street, Blyth NE24 1LZ, UK
Department Paint Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Funding
Horizon 2020
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. The increasing importance of leading edge erosion and a review of existing protection solutions10.1016/j.rser.2019.109382 ↗
2. Leading edge erosion of wind turbine blades10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.044 ↗
3. On erosion issues associated with the leading edge of wind turbine blades10.1088/0022-3727/46/38/383001 ↗
4. Effects of leading edge erosion on wind turbine blade performance10.1002/we.1649 ↗
5. Repair of wind turbine blades: Review of methods and related computational mechanics problems10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.113 ↗
6. Offshore wind turbines operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.rser.2021.110886 ↗
7. The effect of temperature on the erosion of polyurethane coatings for wind turbine leading edge protection10.1016/j.wear.2021.203720 ↗
8. Graphene/sol-gel modified polyurethane coating for wind turbine blade leading edge protection: Properties and performance
9. Development of a numerical model of a novel leading edge protection component for wind turbine blades10.5194/wes-5-1567-2020 ↗
10. Hasager, C., Mishnaevsky, L., Bak, C., Bech, J.I., Faester, S., and Johansen, N.F.-J. (2021). How can we combat leading-edge erosion on wind turbine blades?. DTU International Energy Report 2021: Perspectives on Wind Energy, DTU Wind Energy.
11. Investigation of advanced mica powder nanocomposite filler materials: Surface energy analysis, powder rheology and sound absorption performance10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.056 ↗
12. State of the art and current trends on layered inorganic-polymer nanocomposite coatings for anticorrosion and multi-functional applications10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106684 ↗
13. (2018). Testing of Rotor Blade Erosion Protection Systems: Recommended Practice. Standard No. DNVGL: RP-0171.
14. Hoksbergen, N., Akkerman, R., and Baran, I. (2022). The Springer model for lifetime predictions of wind turbine blade leading edge protection systems: A review and sensitivity study. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15031170 ↗
15. O’Carroll, A. (2018). Correlation of Mechanical Properties to Rain Erosion Resistance of Polymeric Materials. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limerick].
16. Schmitt, G.F. (1971). Materials Parameters That Govern the Rain Erosion Behaviour of Polymeric Coatings and Composites at Subsonic Velocities, Air Force Materials Laboratory. Technical Report AFML-TR-71-197.
17. Rain erosion resistance of injection moulded and compression moulded polybutylene terephthalate PBT10.1016/j.wear.2018.08.016 ↗
18. Mechanical and interfacial characterization of leading-edge protection materials for wind turbine blade applications10.1002/we.2767 ↗
19. Correlation of the rain erosion performance of polymers to mechanical and surface properties measured using nanoindentation
20. Rain erosion properties of materials [and discussion]
21. Erosion damage to solids caused by high-speed collision with rain10.6028/jres.061.006 ↗
22. Impact of erosion testing aspects on current and future flight conditions10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.04.001 ↗
23. Engineering viscoelastic properties in polyurethane coatings to reduce erosion risks in wind turbine blades
24. (2017). Testing of Rubber—Determination of Tensile Strength at Break, Tensile Stress at Yield, Elongation at Break and Stress Values in a Tensile Test. Standard No. DIN 53504:2017-03.
25. Indirect damage in composite materials due to raindrop impact10.1016/0043-1648(81)90257-X ↗
26. Cho, K.S. (2016). Time-Temperature Superposition, Springer Series in Materials Science, Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-7564-9_8 ↗
27. Ouachan, I. (2023). Characterisation and Understanding of Viscoelastic Leading Edge Protection Solutions Used on Offshore Wind Turbines. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol].
28. Daver, F., Kajtaz, M., Brandt, M., and Shanks, R.A. (2016). Creep and recovery behaviour of polyolefin-rubber nanocomposites developed for additive manufacturing. Polymers, 8.10.3390/polym8120437 ↗
29. Hyaluronan hydrogels modified by glycinated Kraft lignin: Morphology, swelling, viscoelastic properties and biocompatibility10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.048 ↗
30. (2020). Evaluation of Erosion and Delamination for Leading Edge Protection Systems of Rotor Blades. Standard No. DNVGL: RP-0573.
31. A computational framework for the analysis of rain induced erosion in wind turbine blades, part I: Stochastic rain texture model and drop impact simulations10.1016/j.jweia.2016.12.006 ↗
32. Liu, X., Zhu, D., Lin, J., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Temperature and frequency dependence of the dynamic viscoelastic properties of silicone rubber. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15143005 ↗
33. Predeformation- and frequency-dependent material behaviour of filler-reinforced rubber: Experiments, constitutive modelling and parameter identification10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.015 ↗
34. Viscoelastic linearity limits for bituminous materials10.1007/BF02479495 ↗
35. The Payne effect revisited10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.28 ↗
36. Carbon nanofiber reinforcement of soft materials10.1039/b805314f ↗
37. Strankowski, M. (2017). Nonlinear viscoelastic properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Polyurethane Polymers: Composites and Nanocomposites, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-804065-2.00013-9 ↗
38. Nano-deformation of crystalline domains during tensile stretching studied by Atomic Force Microscopy10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990415)37:8<859::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
39. Structure-property behaviour of segmented polyether-MDI-butanediol based urethanes: Effect of composition ratio10.1016/0032-3861(82)90411-6 ↗
40. Elucidating the G″ overshoot in soft materials with a yield transition via a time-resolved experimental strain decomposition10.1073/pnas.2003869117 ↗
41. Fly ash as a potential filler for the rubber industry10.1016/B978-0-12-817686-3.00010-4 ↗
42. Viscoelastic characterization of a glass-epoxy composite
43. Rheological and electrical behaviour of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black composites as investigated by creep recovery in shear10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.011 ↗
44. Microphase separation, stress relaxation, and creep behaviour of polyurethane nanocomposites10.1002/app.25462 ↗
45. Viscoelastic properties of fly ash-filled natural rubber compounds: Effect of fly ash loading10.1002/app.29700 ↗